Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Joe Dunford told reporters today that the US will be sending a significant number of new combat troops to Iraq in the weeks to come, saying a series of recommendations have been drawn up, and it’s just a question of exactly which is approved.
This will mark the latest in a series of US escalations in Iraq, which have put the US far above the 3,870 soldier limit they negotiated with Iraq. Pentagon officials concede the number of troops in Iraq is closer to 5,000 now, though the exact figure is not being disclosed.
Pentagon officials insist that they don’t count “temporary troops” in their official numbers, which often means the figures they report publicly are underreported by as many as 1,000 troops at any given time. Iraqi Prime Minister Haider Abadi has been under growing pressure from important Shi’ite figures to keep the US role limited.
Yet the Pentagon seems to be in a never-ending scramble to add more troops, sometimes only a few dozen at a time, sometimes a few hundred. Sending relatively small numbers each time has kept the individual deployments sparsely covered in the US press, and this avoids significant debate over the transition from a “no boots on the ground” war toward one in which thousands of US troops are at or near the front lines.
Justin is not going to apologize so it’s better that we leave him alone on his support of Trump. At least until he tries to promote Trump again. It’s likely that Justin is now very sorry he tried it.
And it’s not too late to start promoting Bernie Sanders who is the obvious antiwar candidate. And the bonus in doing that is keeping Clinton, the worst hawk of them all, at bay.
peace and luv from Canada.
I’ll believe that Bernie Sanders is an obvious antiwar candidate when I see him mention an actual US war campaign.
Sorry about posting off-topic here but Justin has a filter working on his posts.
No, he doesn’t. Justin doesn’t control the filters, nor are the filters article- or author-specific.