In comments that appeared both unnecessary and ridiculously hypocritical, President Obama today declared his belief that Iranian troops, and indeed all foreign fighters involved in the ISIS war in Iraq, should be under the direct control of Iraqi PM Hayder Abadi.
Iran has provided limited military forces to advise and aid Iraq, and there’s been no sign of any acrimony between the two nations over Iran’s involvement, which has been repeatedly welcomed by Abadi.
It’s also obvious that Obama didn’t intend this control to extend to “all” foreign fighters, certainly not including US troops or other Western troops who have joined the war as part of the US coalition.
Of course, it’s not unusual for foreign allies involved in a military operation like this not to give themselves over to direct control of the premier of the attacked country, but Obama’s comments seem to be presented as related to abuses of Sunni civilians in Iraq, which have been a problem dominated by Iraqi troops and Iraqi Shi’ite militias, not Iranian forces.
USG needs to thank the iranias fighting the US mess they made in entire Middle East, USG needs to thank the Iraqi people's fighting their supported terrorism that supported by Saudis and GCC whom are the USG allies in creating the present wars in Middle East. People in Libya, Syria, Iraq and Yemen been suffering due to non existence, falsified and fake democracy both in Europe and USA.
So now Obama is the Commander-in-Chief of Iraq and Iran.
No wonder he looks so "poorly"… he must be overworked
As it stands, it appears that Iran is the only nation preventing the entire region from imploding- we might want to think about that before telling them what they can and can't do with their troops fighting our enemy. Instead of limiting Iran's influence, we should be asking them what they need to finish the job.