Egypt’s ousted President Mohamed Morsi was all-but-disappeared by the military during their July coup d’etat, but appeared in court this week to face a litany of charges. He may or may not be aware of the details, however, as he was in a sound-proof cage for the duration of the hearing.
Morsi’s charges include “escaping from prison” during his brief, illegal detention in the middle of the 2011 Egyptian Revolution, and “collaborating” with Hamas. Analysts say the charges of involvement with Hamas are mostly implausible, since the people he is accused of meeting were either dead or in Israeli prisons at the time.
Morsi’s lawyers were harshly critical of the use of the sound-proof cage, saying it denied the president the right to hear and participate in his own trial. The junta ultimately ruled that it “preserved order” to keep Morsi nominally present but unheard and unhearing during the trial.
The hearing ended with the judge adjourning the trial until late February, and is only the second time Morsi has even been seen since the July 3 coup. Though the junta did not allow private media into the trial to cover it, the president appeared to be in more-or-less good health from the shots shown by the state media.
Another kangaroo court trial, same as Saddam.
Only Morsi never did anything wrong but get elected and try to take a bit of power away from the military.
And to think this dictatorship receives millions of American aid is despicable.
"Freedom and democracy"? Hardly
And to think this dictatorship receives billions in American aid is despicable.
"Freedom and democracy"? Hardly
Normal for a trial with US backing.
Does talking to Hamas actually make Egyptians mad? Kind of curious on that one. Do the Egyptian people support Israel over the Palestinians?
About the only reason I could imagine for Morsi's treatment is that he could say something that's damaging to someone powerful. The seen but not heard theme might be familiar to any number of people used as someone's narrative-objects –e.g. hate-objects ('dictators,' etc.) or sympathy-objects ('victim's famlies,' military members) whose hijacked public function is to complement rather than contradict some sacred storyline (e.g., one that sells a war).
I think this is Israel's style (e.g. 5:40 here http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_co… ) They don't thrive on straight reality so much as they pick-off trouble and promote morons & low-lifes loyal to their line ('pundits').
Somewhere or another I'd heard of Saddam Hussein's mic being cut…Thought I'd heard it from Buthaina Neveln. http://spingolaspeaks.wordpress.com/2013/12/30/mo…