The UN Security Council has approved a major escalation of the UN military operation in South Sudan today, bringing the overall size of the UN force to 12,500 troops and 1,323 “police.”
Secretary General Ban Ki-moon was quick to downplay the prospect of the extra troops accomplishing much in the ongoing civil war, however, saying that there is “no military solution to this conflict.”
The top UN humanitarian official in the nation, Toby Lanzer, says that the initial estimates of 500 dead in the fighting are much too low, and that he has “absolutely no doubt” that the deaths are well into the thousands.
The fighting in South Sudan started with a failed military coup last week by fighters loyal to the country’s former vice president. The fighting is split largely along ethnic lines, between the Dinka president and the Nuer tribe the vice president belongs to.
If the coup had resulted in a leader that Western powers (US/UK/Israel) approved of the UN would be sending aid not troops.
If the coup had resulted in a leader that Western powers (US/UK/Israel) approved of the UN would be sending aid not troops.
Precisely. Which is exactly what Obomba did for the Egyptian coup, after illegally laying the groundwork for it, and is still doing, blatantly, in front of the whole world, in opposition to the human rights organizations, because the US wants to keep Egypt as its ally for Mid East hegemony, and the best way to ensure it remains that way is by an authoritarian military rule that prevents democracy. This is par for the course for the USA.
Why does the U.N. and world governments care about the number of deaths in this or any other region? Their N.W.O. plan is for population reduction. Sending more bodies into the area will only allow more deaths. Oh, I get it, when you have a killing field send in more participants. Apparently the dummies signing up to die don't understand this reasoning. Wake up troops and stop participating..
Bob L.