When the Obama Administration unveiled a $208 billion “modernization” plan for nuclear weapons, there were twin focuses, on the enormous waste of money and on the budget being unrealistic.
Just over a year later, the Congressional Budget Office is saying exactly what the thinktanks were: that the budget was a pipedream and that the real cost will be at least $355 billion.
President Obama has been pushing for massive increases in nuclear spending for years, calling it “long overdue.” The plan is under criticism as a violation of the spirit of his promise not to develop “new” nuclear arms.
Violating the spirit but not technically the letter of agreements is very much in keeping with administration policy these days, however, and they insist that modernizing weapons is not technically the same as developing “new” ones, even if the replacements are dramatically more expensive and have totally different features and uses.
Wasting billions on replacements for unused and unneeded weapons is the in-thing right now, and while neither is expected to spend nearly as much both Britain and Russia are also pushing modernization programs on parts of their nuclear arsenals.
So which corporation(s) stand to make all those billions? That's what it's all about anyway.
It is O-V-E-R for the good ol' USA…this is/has been the penultimate BAIT & SWITCH!
The concept of MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) worked. But when those who are responsible for the non-use are all friggin' megalomaniacs or worse, they believe that they have been anointed to bring about the Apocalypse of the religious fables then we are surely walking the razor's edge.
Wouldn't want a nuclear weapon to live in poverty while people all over America and the world are starving would we ? The nukes come first. And then the first shall be last. Biblical prophecy finally coming true in a strange and unexpected way.
Good job with a new arms race, sans the USSR.
Good job with a new arms race, sans the USSR.
Good job with a new arms race, sans the USSR.
maybe the usa needs to be treated like iran concerning nukes?
maybe the usa needs to be treated like iran concerning nukes?
What warheads will be on the Lockheed-missiles in Romania, Poland and on 32 ships in the Mediterranean Sea ? Maybe a version of the MX/Minuteman-3/Trident-2 D5 warhead to minimize nuclear winter effects if used against missile silos ?
Happy days are here again…the skies above are raining nukes…lets us all sing a song of doom–happy days are here again…
The children won't have a future. The missiles in Romania, Poland and on 32 ships in the Mediterranean Sea (European Phased Adaptive Approach) will lead to Launch On Warning, probably by 2017. And then it's only a matter of time !!!
The article misses some of what is happening. This huge price is mostly not about any nuclear explosive.
It is about the most advanced exotic "smart bomb" technology delivered in the most exotic ways, by ICBM or stealth missiles. It is a boondoggle wish list of every exotic idea for smart weapons that can be dreamed up. That is where the money is going.
Modernizing overage nukes is only the excuse.