US officials are trying to spin Iran’s elections, and the victory of President-elect Hassan Rohani as proof that their ongoing sanctions are “working,” and that the economic damage done scared Iranian voters into electing the diplomacy-minded cleric.
Rohani ran a campaign of domestic reform along with promising to focus on diplomacy and international rapprochement. Whether this is really what the US “wants” remains to be seen, however, as does their response to Rohani’s election.
Administration officials have been nearly mum on their intentions, and while experts are urging them to respond to overtures with a serious “olive branch,” hawks are taking the “sanctions work” message as justification for a never-ending policy of increasing sanctions.
Then there’s Israel, which has reacted angrily to the elections, expressing fear that a pro-diplomacy Iran might lead to actual diplomacy and get in the way of their goals of a war.
If Iran’s election of Rohani was indeed a response to US sanctions, an unproven assertion, it seems that it is not the response the hawks were hoping for, and whether it will mean anything depends entirely on how much Israel can push the idea of war as an end unto itself.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Trump Officials Trying to Finalize Legal Language to Expand Gitmo's Use - August 20th, 2017
- White House Continues to Talk Up 'Preventative War' Against North Korea - August 20th, 2017
- Trump Elevates US Cyber Command to a Formal Military Command - August 20th, 2017
- Abbas: After 20 Meetings I Still Don't Understand Trump's Peace Plan - August 20th, 2017
- Lebanon's Army Advances Deep Into ISIS-Held Border Territory - August 20th, 2017