The “Friends of Syria” meetings have become a regular ritual across the nations in favor of regime change in Syria, with officials from a number of nations getting together every week or two to make new pledges of aid for rebel factions, while rebels insist that whatever they are promised is insufficient.
This week’s meeting in Doha was no different, with the Free Syrian Army (FSA) using it as an opportunity to demand massive influxes of “heavy weapons” as well as an internationally-imposed no-fly zone and designated safe zones from which to launch attacks.
FSA spokesman Louay Meqdad insisted that the rebels vitally need shoulder-mounted anti-aircraft weapons, anti-tank missiles, mortars and other arms, while saying they needed to ensure that Syria’s military wasn’t going to “use Scud missiles with unconventional warheads” against them.
Though there seems to be more momentum to send arms unquestioningly to the FSA, their past promises to attack civilian aircraft if given the opportunity likely casts a wide shadow over giving them anything too advanced.
Look: the entire northern part of Persian Gulf is promised to Saudis and other alike Tyrant regimes by the US and EU, that is the only way for US and EU being able to dictate and manipulated the world economy.., or if you like share the region among themselves.., it turns out that after almost 20 years of USA and NATO cooperation the Europeans have found that is to expensive and heavy costs of lives with no democracy on site.., so they have decided to change the course…, for Saudis and others alike Tyrant regime this is not an acceptable politics and they posses plenty of jihadists and other form of mercenaries.., they want what they are promised by one or the other governments, at the same time they know that they are NOT getting anywhere with Syria war, Afghanistan war and Etc. so they come up with meeting as against and for anything and everything that they can think of, Doha, Istanbul and other meetings are just another having a good time gathering paid by Turkish people suffering so as Syrian and Iraqis and Palestinians and other nations. These "people" do not represent the Syrian people, they represent themselves and what they want, so goes for the Turkish government.., they represent the Saudis regime not the Turkish democracy achieved by the Turkish people.
How can an antiwar website distribute the war propaganda of the contract killers of NATO/Arab League? They are paid mercenaries overwhelmingly non-Syrians. The half of them have no will, except to earn salary from NATO/Saudis,stealing it from Syrians and being a hero warrior and the other half are brainwashed Jihadi killers who in addition to the money fight for their alleged Allah, which in reality is of course not any god but the US Army commanders. The real might of Allah relies on the US/AL- sent enhanced anti-tank weapons, Stingers, sophisticated sniper rifles and especially the satellite communication-based US command&control systems of the US Army, which are leading this guerrilla war. So not Allah is mighty, but the US Army unconventional warfare tactics.
These secret proxy fighters of NATO are tools and get their commands and do not ask for "heavy weapons" – they are asked to ask for such things in the well coordinate theater piece corporate media does offer us as "news".
Virtually any reader here on antiwar knows that this war of NATO/AL against Syria is a well planned war series of USA covered by faked propaganda terms like "Arab Spring" and "rebels" who are in fact mercenaries and most of them foreigners – recruted in any arab country and even brainwashed Arabs of NATO countries.
Proof: http://08oo.wordpress.com/2012/05/30/key-reasons-…
Assad's old and rather battered Air Force could be defeated in short order by any of three regional forces, and by all three together if they like. Turkey could do it. Saudi Arabia could do it with or without help from other Gulf Arab air forces. Israel could do it.
Having the US do it only brings the greatest likelihood of Russian response to prop up Assad's air defenses.
If it is not important enough to any or all of those three to do it, then it is not important enough for us to do it for them.