General: US Military Can Win Afghan War Without Pakistan
Predicts 'Typical' Major Increase in Violence in Spring
Speaking today at a Pentagon news conference, Gen. David Rodriguez, the second in command of the ongoing NATO occupation of Afghanistan, insisted that despite spending the last nine years harping about it, the US doesn’t really need Pakistan’s help in the war, and can win witbout them.
“That’s not a mission stopper in my mind,” insisted Rodriguez, which may surprise the Pakistanis because the Obama Administration has been repeatedly, angrily demanding more and more destabilzing offensives in Northern Pakistan since taking office, and the Bush Administration was largely blaming its own Afghan failures on Pakistan.
He also insisted that the US would not have to launch a ground invasion of Pakistan’s North Waziristan Agency, which will be a considerable relief to the Pakistani government, but did hint at more escalations of drone strikes in the region, to “decrease the impact of the safe haven.”
Interestingly, however, Rodriguez also predicted the “typical” major increase in violence would come again this spring, which would be particularly troublesome in this case because the winter lull that normally precedes the spring violence never came, meaning the increase will just be a new escalation of the overall war.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- No Deal: US Restarted Pakistan Drone Strikes Despite Objections - February 22nd, 2012
- Syrian National Council Demands Foreign Invasion - February 22nd, 2012
- State Dept.: Pakistani Taliban 'Not Welcome' at Truce Talks - February 22nd, 2012
- Israeli FM: Our Decision to Attack Iran None of US, Russia's Business - February 22nd, 2012
- Hunger Strike Ends, but Adnan's Detention Without Charges Doesn't - February 22nd, 2012





ghouri
February 2nd, 2011 at 4:27 am
If they can win the war without pakistan why they ask for more and more.
Major work has been done by pakistan and afghan soldiers american can only bomb the country and kill innocents.
Torpedo
February 2nd, 2011 at 4:47 am
If you mean winning by leaving, yes.
Otherwise, the empire will lose.
emistruth
February 2nd, 2011 at 5:35 am
America certainly can "win" the Afghan war. Declare victory and get out now!
VietnamWarVet
February 2nd, 2011 at 8:05 am
Another general who is smoking some really bad dope!
NO 'invader' has ever 'won' a lasting war in Afghanistan – maybe the generals need to read History and stop smoking dope!
tommauel
February 2nd, 2011 at 10:54 am
Maybe this is a hint the US will proceed with more overt incursions into Pakistan. Because Pakistan will turn on the US if they continue border incursions and CIA drone strikes. What he might be hinting at is the US is ready to escalate and fight both Pakistan and Afghanistan because victory without invasion in Pakistan is not possible.
Jaime
February 2nd, 2011 at 1:29 pm
It'd be interesting to see the US fighting Pakistan as well as Afghanistan.
stuartbramhall
February 2nd, 2011 at 4:47 pm
The problem is that we're not being told the truth about the real (strategic) reasons for the US war in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Pakistan, not Afghanistan is the real target – and the Pentagon/CIA goal is for energy and mineral rich Balochistan to secede from Pakistan to become a US client state – just like energy and mineral rich Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan and the other former Soviet republics. We're also being lied to about CIA support for the Baloch separatist movement and their efforts to disrupt operations at the Chinese-built Gwadar Port (and the energy transit route for Iranian oil and natural gas destined for China). Including the fact that the CIA is training young Baloch separatists in bomb-making and other terrorist activities.
I blog about this at http://stuartbramhall.aegauthorblogs.com/2010/12/…
I have also posted a recent map of Free Balochistan (from their website).
I blog about this at I blog about this at http://stuartbramhall.aegauthorblogs.com/2010/12/…
Where I have also posted a recent map of Free Balochistan (from their website).