Though a Palestinian Liberation Organization official’s offer to trade the recognition of Israel as any sort of state they want to call it, including a “Jewish State” in return for a commitment to negotiate along the pre-1967 borders has not provoked any official answer from Israel, US officials don’t seem outraged at the idea.
Rather State Department spokesman Philip Crowley termed it a “move in the right direction,” though he said the content proved the need for more direct talks. The peace talks stalled last month when Israel allowed a partial settlement freeze to expire.
But as with Israel’s “offer” to trade a 60 day partial extension for a recognition of Israel as a “Jewish State,” the PLO “counteroffer” is based around a condition that the other side has vowed never to accept, in this case the return of all territories occupied in 1967.
It seems that by and large both sides have acknowledged that the talks ended with the end of the last settlement freeze, and are instead making grandiose offers designed to be rejected, chiefly so they can blame the other side for the failure.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Trump Officials Trying to Finalize Legal Language to Expand Gitmo's Use - August 20th, 2017
- White House Continues to Talk Up 'Preventative War' Against North Korea - August 20th, 2017
- Trump Elevates US Cyber Command to a Formal Military Command - August 20th, 2017
- Abbas: After 20 Meetings I Still Don't Understand Trump's Peace Plan - August 20th, 2017
- Lebanon's Army Advances Deep Into ISIS-Held Border Territory - August 20th, 2017