Iraq Election Law Delay Imperils US Pullout
As Deadline Looms, Iraqis Still Far From Approving Law
With the deadline for passing a new election law just 24 hours away, the Iraqi parliament appears as far away as ever from deciding on the rules to government the January elections, seen as key to the Obama Administration’s drawdown strategy.
Despite fevered negotiations, the assorted parties have been unable to agree on a law which would ensure political transparency for the vote, and would instead rely on the 2005 law, in which Iraqis are not able to vote for individual candidates but instead have to vote for non-specific bloc lists.
Grand Ayatollah Sistani, the top Shi’ite cleric in the Shi’ite majority nation, has denounced the current system of closed list voting and demanded that Iraqis be allowed to vote on individual candidates. It has been rumored that Sistani will call for a boycott if the law isn’t changed, though Sistani’s office has so far denied this.
The failure to pass a new election law could throw a serious wrench into the US drawdown strategy, such as it is, since the Obama Administration has been counting on the election being a stabilizing factor and is holding off on any major troop cuts until it sees how the election fares.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Homegrown US 'Terror Plots' Drop, But Nation Still 'On Edge' - February 9th, 2012
- Amputations Soared Among US Troops in 2011 - February 9th, 2012
- US Still Can't Find Missing Libyan Missiles - February 9th, 2012
- Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood: Let Us Form Government - February 9th, 2012
- As Reports of Violence Grow in Syria, So Do Western Calls for Intervention - February 9th, 2012





canadaguy
October 14th, 2009 at 6:58 pm
Well, if they hang around until after a likely Afghan troop increase, then Obama will have more troops deployed in total than Bush did.
Peaceful_Idiot
October 15th, 2009 at 3:49 am
This is very shocking news.
gerryhiles
October 15th, 2009 at 4:05 am
The whole thing is ludicrous.
Iraq is an occupied country and will remain so … well who imagines that "the largest embassy" in the world will be vacated by the US, or the numerous military bases?
It is all rather reminiscent of Vichy France and elections being held there, under German occupation.
How can meaningful elections be had when there is an occupying power? Ludicrous and not worth debating in terms similar to countries which are not occupied by a foreign power.
Steve_Hogan
October 15th, 2009 at 6:52 pm
Wouldn't it be refreshing if the warmongers would at least be intellectually honest for once? Can't they admit that we're there for the duration regardless of the circumstances? Their inane excuses for delaying troop withdrawals don't even pass the laugh test. Do they think we're stupid?