Supreme Court: Iraq Has Legal Immunity for Actions Under Saddam
2003 US Invasion 'Restored Iraq's Immunity'
The US Supreme Court has ruled today that the 2003 American invasion of Iraq restored the nation’s sovereign immunity from lawsuits in US courts. That being the case, the court threw out lawsuits filed by Americans related to actions of the Saddam Hussein government ousted in the invasion.
US law generally grants immunity to foreign nations from lawsuits in US courts, but that immunity does not apply to nations listed as a state sponsor of terrorism. Iraq was considered a state sponsor of terror at the time of the incidents, but had that designation removed after the American occupation.
Among those seeking redress in US courts was an American captured along the Iraq-Kuwait border in 1995. Lower courts had awarded them millions in damages from the current Iraqi government for their torture in detention. The Iraqi government had maintained, as the court determined today, that it was not responsible for the actions of the Hussein government.
Last 5 posts by Jason Ditz
- Homegrown US 'Terror Plots' Drop, But Nation Still 'On Edge' - February 9th, 2012
- Amputations Soared Among US Troops in 2011 - February 9th, 2012
- US Still Can't Find Missing Libyan Missiles - February 9th, 2012
- Egypt's Muslim Brotherhood: Let Us Form Government - February 9th, 2012
- As Reports of Violence Grow in Syria, So Do Western Calls for Intervention - February 9th, 2012





This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.