Since February 29 of 2020, the US has had a peace deal in place, intending to withdraw from Afghanistan on May 1 of 2021. The US military was always averse to that, but seems to have been basing its contracts on the idea it wouldn’t happen.
Former financial officials are warning that if the US does leave Afghanistan, either on May 1 or any time in 2021, the Pentagon would be facing down a “barrel full of lawsuits” from contracts that had not been fulfilled yet.
This is rather a flimsy excuse for dragging the war on, and such a clumsy situation to be in with the knowledge of the war’s end being public throughout, that it must inevitably be questioned if this was just many, many colossal blunders, or if the Pentagon was openly trying to contractually obligate itself to the Afghan War.
Another obvious question is why, as theses contracts kept being signed, officials weren’t raising the issue of these contractual obligations throughout 2020. At the very least, that would’ve been a chance for someone to convince them to stop making such contracts before now, which once again makes this seem nearly deliberate.
Of course none of this really obliges the US to stay in Afghanistan. Rather, it just imposes a cost for making good on the peace deal. Its hard to imagine that the US would honestly keep the war going just to avoid these lawsuits, even if that’s the obvious implication of officials pointing out the risk.
To the extent anyone might be swayed, it’s an administration that is undecided on the pullout, and which might be inclined to put off making any decisions to avoid embarrassing lawsuits.
Deals extending beyond the 2021 pullout dates were still being made by the Pentagon as recently as this month, according to officials. At some point, one would hope that the military realizes the hole they’ve made for themselves and stop digging, because the US cannot possibly stay in Afghanistan forever to avoid lawsuits.
Even if the Pentagon gets its way and keeps the war going beyond 2021, this is an embarrassing way to go about it, and should once again draw attention to the Pentagon trying to avoid military pullouts by appealing to the momentum the war already has.
The Taliban will start killing GIs if we leave.
The Talisman apparently have not killed many or perhaps ANY GIs for an entire year!!! But they certainly will get back into the killing GIS action if we squelch the deal to leave on May 1, and they are very open and explicit about it.
So if it”s GIS lives that concern you it would be better to leave. The real question in my mind is, how many GI and contractors will die IF we don’t leave in the first 24 hrs? Wana venture a guess..?????
How are they supposed to do that if we have left already?
The Taliban gonna load up their war canoes and paddle across the broad Pacific, next stop San Diego?
More like the Taliban will restart killing GIs on the DAY AFTER we DON’T LEAVE, as agreed, in the treaty. Why would we stay…???? Oh, I forgot, to keep the OPIUM PROFITS FLOWING… DUH..!!!!!
Mercenaries have to be paid .
Wont it be still cheaper if we leave and pay the contractors ? It will save us from signing future contracts to secure and protect current contracts and save a lot of lives and prevent injuries.
Remember the old door-to-door salesman’s trick of sliding one foot into the door space – keeps one from getting a door slammed in one’s face. You’ve got to know that the military has many lawyers in its procurement departments to advise against awarding contracts under illegal conditions – these contracts for services in forbidden Iraq are just that old salesman’s ploy.
Yup, and the government contracts all have conditions that the government can cancel contracts for any reason. This very story is actually just a deep state lie to try to keep us entangled there so someone can profit off of war and destruction.
For a country that just crapped 10 trillion in stimulus the last year I sure wouldn’t settle contract disputes with million dollar Hellfire missiles anymore. Conjure the cash out of thin air, pay the man and let’s go home!
uncle sam has to remain in afghanistan in order to continue the opium production that is going on there now
Talk about a pathetic excuse.