Flanked by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, President Trump  unveiled his long anticipated peace plan, in a public event seemingly  more designed to distract from Netanyahu’s indictment than to actually  offer anything of substance. 
 
 A lot of terms of the plan have been long-rumored, and effectively  remain so even after the presentation, as there was a conspicuous lack  of specificity, and of any concrete details, beyond Trump insisting this  is the Palestinians’ “last chance.“
 
 But their last chance for what? That’s less clear. Trump talked of  Palestinian statehood, but doing so next to Netanyahu, who repeatedly  has denounced the very notion of a Palestinian state, gives that very  little credibility. Moreover, reports are that the deal forbids the  Palestinians from having any of the trappings of a state, including even  superficial control over its own borders. 
 
 What was said Tuesday put no doubt on that interpretation, and indeed  the biggest takeaway of the offer was not that the Palestinians were getting barely something, but that Trump was prepared to immediately  endorse Israeli sovereignty on the annexation of all settlements, and  the Jordan Valley. 
 
 Trump did suggest Palestinian territory would double, but as with  everything else the Palestinians might get, this was vague. Trump even  declared that Israel had for the first time accepted a map, but then  proceeded to say that a committee was being formed with Israel to  actually work out what the map will look like, underscoring that no map  has been settled upon at all. 
 
 Further offers to the Palestinians were similarly dubious, as Trump  reiterated a $50 billion US investment offer, now conditioned on  accepting the plan, such as it is. Trump also promised a four year  window in which Israel would not develop any settlements in the occupied  part of the West Bank that is nominally set aside for Palestinian  statehood. Yet there is no apparent enforcement mechanism for this  within the plan, and it is unlikely that either Trump or the Israeli  government would be able to stop illegal settlements popping up across  Palestine. 
 
 That both Netanyahu and his political rival Benny Gantz were able to  endorse the plan underscores how little the Palestinians would really  get, as anything that might conceivably end in a proper Palestinian  state would be wildly unpopular on the Israeli right, and a non-starter  during Israel’s constant elections. 
 
 This assumption of Palestinian rejection is likely a big part of Israeli  acceptance, as it would allow them to spin themselves as the pro-peace  ones, and the Palestinians as the real problem. 
 
 The Ambassadors of Oman, Bahrain, and the United Arab Emirates were in  attendance at the unveiling, which suggests at least some nominal  support within the Arab world. This is being emphasized, and presented  as some support by “the other side,” even though no Palestinians were  there, nor is it clear if any Palestinians were even invited. 
 
 
 
Trump Presents Offer the Palestinians Can’t Refuse
Warns the plan is the Palestinians' 'last chance' 
			Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
			Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
    ×
    
      
    
  


