Having managed a scant five seats in the April election, Yisrael
Beiteinu, the party of Avigdor Lieberman, has emerged as kingmaker. or
as seems increasingly likely, election-maker, as on Monday he ruled out joining the Netanyahu-led coalition.
Israel’s parliament has 120 seats, meaning 61 are required to form a
coalition. Netanyahu has a solid 60 seats, but Lieberman was really his
only chance to get over the threshold, and that’s not going to happen.
Under Israeli law the president is intended to keep nominating coalition
leaders to try to form governments so long as it is plausible, but it
seems Netanyahu may have been the first and last nominee, with
parliament voting today on the preliminary ready to dissolve the Knesset
and hold another election. Two more votes have to pass to actually hold
the election, and those are likely to happen Wednesday, when
Netanyahu’s mandate expires.
Netanyahu continues to beg Lieberman to come on board at the last
minute, but Lieberman’s longtime acrimony with the religious right had
made that all but impossible. Even offers of compromise from those
parties were spurned, and Lieberman says he’ll never join the “halakah
government.” Lieberman also declined to recommend an alternative
coalition leader.
This may not just be Lieberman’s stubbornness blocking a government, as
reports have him negotiating with Ayelet Shaked of the New Right about running a joint list in the next election. Lieberman got five seats and New Right didn’t get any, but polls suggest the two combined could net ten seats total.
While Israel has often struggled to get majority coalitions formed,
they’ve tended to come together at the last minute. This time, however,
it is unlikely that there is an avenue for compromise.
The situation looks so dire for Netanyahu that even President Trump has come forward to urge parliament to back Netanyahu,
promising the US-Israel alliance would be “stronger than ever.” Though
it is increasingly common for the US to meddle in the coalition
formations of friendly governments, it is all but unheard of in Israel,
where historically the US has just accepted unconditionally whatever
majority Israel manages to piece together.
It is good to see an article by antiwar.com.
There are too many Reuters articles. They may as well be NATO articles. Is there a chance to place the name of source, and then article title. It is mostly huge waste of time reading Reuters, as it is clear from the outset their bias.
Can we get the warning, so it will save time nkt having to open an article, and then finding out that source is Reuters.
I agree about Reuters and also Yahoo. it is useless trying to get real info from either.
True, Yahoo is another narrative peddling outfit. I do not mind reading their
articles when I am curious about the narrative evolution on any topic. Otherwise, I would rather skip their sloganeering.