Among the leadership of both the Democrats and Republicans, the idea of
US-backed regime change in Venezuela enjoys broad support. After this
week’s failed coup, however, administration rhetoric is changing
harshly, and some other officials are expressing disquiet about it.
Not that there is any real suggestion of ditching support for Guaido
taking over. Instead, some Democrats are suggesting that the US should
focus on getting more unity behind US sanctions, stop threatening to
attack Venezuela, and importantly, to stop using rhetoric that the
Maduro government can use for its own propaganda.
This last point in particular is a recurring concern, which some South
American allies have warned the administration about for months. Maduro
has long relied on allegations of US plots against him as a way to
garner sympathy and support, and constant US talk of plotting against
him makes that all the easier.
Among Democrats, how to approach these disagreements is also varying.
Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) suggested the focus be on “internationalizing”
the sanctions, while Rep. David Cicilline (D-RI) called for legislation
to explicitly express Congressional opposition to a US invasion of
Venezuela.
Rep. Tom Malinowski (D-NJ), on the other hand, suggested that the US
should emphasize that this is a popular uprising from within, and not a
US-driven regime change. That seems to be a broad assumption to make,
but he warned the White House should stop giving the appearance of it
being a US imposed move.
US Bipartisan Unity on Venezuela Starting to Crumble
Some Democrats are uncomfortable with attacking Venezuela
Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
×