The Trump Administration has committed to seeing a regime change in
Venezuela, aiming to oust President Maduro and replace him with
opposition leader Juan Guaido, seen as more friendly to US interests.
But previous talk of Maduro as a “gangster” in and of himself is
starting to fall by the wayside. Instead, officials, particularly
Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, are presenting the enemy in Venezuela as socialism in general, making this an ideological fight.
This somewhat changes the tone, if not the intentions, of the US push
for regime change, centering it not just on ousting a single government,
but demanding Venezuela as a whole abandon its present ruling ideology
in favor of one more palatable to US interests.
That’s a much different demand, and makes Venezuela’s decision to expel
the US diplomats from Caracas less surprising. Yet Pompeo, who had long
defended leaving the diplomats there, tried to talk around this
expulsion, presenting the withdrawal as a US decision related to the
worsening situation within Venezuela.
This, adds to constant US threats to resort to invading Venezuela
militarily to impose regime change. Pompeo presented the US diplomats as
a “constraint” on policy that is no longer in place, suggesting they
are nearing the point of intervention.
The New York Times seemed to be backing up the argument that the US
should escalate the situation, arguing that having backed Guaido and
failed to get him into power could be similarly to President Obama not
following through on 2012 threats against Syrian President Bashar
al-Assad. This seems likely to just encourage President Trump on a
military path, determined not to look weak.
US Presents Enemy in Venezuela as Socialism, Not Just Maduro
As sanctions fail, officials threaten more actions to impose regime change
Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
×