On Monday, Russian President Vladimir Putin issued a decree which suspended Russian participation
in the Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty. The decision came
after the US announced their intention to withdraw from the same treaty
earlier this year.
The INF was negotiated in 1987 between President Reagan and Soviet
leader Mikhail Gorbachev, and banned land-based nuclear missiles of a
certain range. It effectively took nuclear arms out of Europe.
The deal was successful for years, though in the past decade the US
started accusing Russia of a perceived violation surrounding a single
class of missile. Russia offered inspections of the missiles, and even
put one on public display for foreign reporters and officials to access.
The US insisted this was insufficient.
The alleged violation was based around the potential range of the
missile. Russia maintained it was tested and fitted for shorter range
than the INF covers. The US saw it as similar enough to a sea-based
missile that it would have a range that the INF might cover. But the US
never proved it, and instead spent years complaining until they finally
abandoned the deal this year.
This has led Russia to believe that the US intends to put missiles back
into Europe, which the US denies. Putin has threatened a substantial
nuclear buildup if the US does so, and in suspending the deal, might
start developing missiles that are actually designed to violate INF.
If the US is telling the truth about not wanting missiles in Europe,
then the decision to withdraw from the INF was foolish, as it only ends
Russia’s obligations, and permits them to develop more missiles.
Either way, the INF seems virtually dead now, and the US has made all
the decisions on killing it. The failure to engage with Russia on the
perceived violation shows it was never about a single class of missiles,
but about giving the US a pretext to dishonor the deal.
Russia Officially Suspends INF Treaty With US
US had already withdrawn from the treaty earlier this year
Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
×