Israel’s Supreme Court has shot down a Freedom of Information request by attorneys related to the nation’s export of arms to Rwanda during the 1990-95 period, accepting the Defense Ministry’s argument that national security depended on keeping the matter secret.
The attorneys seeking the information noted that the sales in at least part of this period would’ve violated international law, and a UN Security Council weapons embargo imposed in the midst of the genocide in Rwanda.
During spring of 1994, between 500,000 and 1,000,000 Tutsi civilians in Rwanda were massacred by the government and its supporters, nominally to prevent the implementation of a power-sharing deal negotiated by the international community.
Israel exported rifles and ammunition to Rwanda which was used by the regime in its genocide, but the extent of it has remained uncertain, and no one involved has ever been held to account. The court’s ruling will likely keep it that way.
The massacres in Rwanda followed the shooting down of a airplane carrrying the leaders of Rwanda and Burundi who had just negotiated the peace agreement. The general belief was and is that the assassination was the work of a Tutsi rebel brigade that had defected from Ugandan service. The commander of that brigade went on to become the ruler of Rwanda. This article implies that the slaughter was a reaction to the agreement, rather than the provocation. Provocation is of course _not_ justification but it helps to get facts straight.