Indications are that the specifics of the “imminent” terror plot this week are extremely limited in the intelligence community. Coupled with administration reluctance to share what little they do know, it’s a recipe for wild speculation.
Since the State Department issued a travel alert covering the entire rest of the planet related to the plot, it was natural to ask if the threat extends to US soil as well. The White House refuses to say.
White House spokesman Jay Carney faced a flurry of questions about the plot, and dodged essentially all of them, saying only that the administration is taking “precautions” and believes the threat, whatever it may be, is “significant and ongoing.”
But warnings to the American public that don’t include any details aren’t particularly helpful, and even as they close embassies en masse, the administration concedes they might not even be the target.
While Congressional supporters are attempting to paint the action as vindication of the surveillance state, the embarrassing paucity of information given to the American public underscores the argument that the administration is treating secrecy as an end unto itself, and isn’t particularly concerned with keeping the people apprised of the situation.
I have no problem with the government using the surveillance program in cases like these . . . just NOT against the American people.
NSA after questioning over and over again went from 50 attacks of terror prevented due to their constant spying of Americans to maybe 1 was actually the real truth. I kind of doubt that the 'maybe 1' is correct…. I suspect everybody is too busy seeking outspoken Americans and tea party organizations as well as on line news items to turn in to their superiors and earn the brownie points than to find the more protected messages of terrorists. Then there's the rest of them who are just enjoying their jobs way too much by spying on private pages.