Defense Secretary Philip Hammond has admitted that the British government is holding scores of “suspects” in military custody in the Helmand Province of Afghanistan, with the detainees being held without charges, without access to a lawyer, and indeed with access to any legal system.
Hammond downplayed the revelation, and dismissed claims from human rights lawyer Phil Shiner that the prison amounted to a “secret facility,” even though its existence as a detention center wasn’t public knowledge. He claimed the detainees could be transferred to the Afghan government in a “matter of days,” though at least one of the 90 has reportedly been held for over a full year.
The decision to start detaining suspects came after repeated reports of widespread torture in the Afghan prison system. Hammond complained that it was disingenuous for Shiner to complain about the open-ended detentions without charges when it was Shiner’s own firm that pointed out that transferring captives to the custody of a nation practising torture was in violation of the UN Convention on Human Rights.
NATO’s own rules of engagement say they can only hold detainees without charges for 96 hours, however, and the British military appears to have just openly flouted this, insisting that if they couldn’t send them to disappear into an Afghan torture dungeon they’d just have to keep them more or less permanently on a British military base. Hammond insisted some of the unnamed captives posed a threat to British occupation forces in Afghanistan, meaning if the Afghan torture situation is never addressed, as seems likely, they are apparently prepared to just keep holding them without charges.
Not a surprise that the English fruits have their own concentration camp fashioned after what their American masters do in Guantanamo.
One has to love the passing of the buck by Hammond. If the Afghan prison system is indeed such a torture dungeon and the Afghan "government" is powerless or just unwilling to change that, then why are Hammond's soldiers still there, fighting, killing and dying to *protect* that same government? Hammond displays this typical military short-sightedness, their actions have a direct cause and that's why it's *okay*?