While other nations, notably Britain, have come out of al-Qaeda’s growing influence in Syria’s rebellion with the epiphany that arming these guys is a really bad idea bound to have all sorts of unforeseeable consequences, new reports suggest that President Obama is warming up to the concept.
Reports emerging late last night say that President Obama wants to demonstrate “more aggressive US leadership” in imposing regime change in Syria, and that this could likely end up meaning throwing weapons at whatever guerrilla factions will take them.
Incredibly, this report includes claims that President Obama is “more confident” in Syria’s rebels now, at a time when all the evidence and common sense would suggest that he should be the exact opposite.
Instead, Obama is expected to push forward with a plan of some sort by June, and use the dubious allegations of chemical weapons as an excuse to justify whatever he decides to do. Whether officials will ever go public with their decision one way or the other remains to be seen, as previous efforts to “facilitate” Saudi arms to the rebels were mostly kept quiet in press conferences, and only came out in unofficial statements.
Just in case the drone war isn't offensive and pathetic enough, and Gitmo, and Libya, Obama wants to make sure he goes down in history as the earth's worst president.
Dude, he's the States' president. You might have had a say in voting for him but the rest of us, out here in the other bit of the world, didn't. Comparing a leader of one country to all the others is meaningless. Don't get me wrong, I agree he as bad a disappointment as could have been conceived–but let's not start comparing him to other countries' presidents.
The so-called "rebels" are already being armed, and this is just more games…but all that aside, perhaps Mr. Obama should invite this kid to sing at the White House to memorialize the arrangement:
http://youtu.be/0rW3SyQ6WqY?t=1m40s
Look: US governments doesn't need arm these jihadist and other kind of sunny terrorists.., they are already armed by Saudis and others who buy their weapons from USA and England and France and Sweden and Italy and etc. so what US government says or do is not relevant to the issue of those terrorists that receive their weapons, the are supplied from libya.., which USA government was involved in overthrow the legitimate Libyan government, they get it from NATO sources as Turkey where they are trained.., the get it from the Jordanian government whom is supplied by the british and USA where CIA is training these bandits.., for that these government are guilty even when they deny the facts.., yet these government know one thing and that is.., the Syrian people standing tall and defeating these thieves and they know it.., so these government will continue with their cartoonish act and mind trying to put you to sleep.
actually, I don't think so.
I rather believe that this deliberately launched message is a trial-balloon, to test the waters – er, winds for arming the FSA-al Nusra-al Quaida-terrorists in Syria.
But obviously, this baloon is deflated on arrival, already.
Because nothing says, "Jihad, I Love You!" more than a shipment of brand new rocket launchers.
We love jihad, it makes money for the big boys! And it furthers our objectives in dividing and conquering.
Why still these fake headlines here ?
"Obama Considers Arming Syrian Rebels" ???
They are armed from the begining! They are sent in with weapons ! Killing innocents to created hate against Assad with the help of dictatorial fake news outlets like Al Jazeera, and the NATO-media copy stations.
These paid killers are result of an long term education campaign of the US are recruited for this war that was planned long time ago and they are armed from the beginning with very sophisticated US weapons and other weapons of any kind. USA does control their infiltration, their fights by satellite phones and command & control laptops, getting warned with fresh drone or satellite images when the Syrian Army approaches.
They have very advanced anti-tank and anti air missiles – and are proud to show this on youtube.
Jason Ditz permanently ignores facts: http://08oo.wordpress.com/2012/05/30/key-reasons-…
If you want to understand the permanent war mongering here – I suggest this excellent article with a great photo of Jason Ditz about antiwar's betrayal mission:
http://colorrevolutionsandgeopolitics.blogspot.de…
Obama should call this: "No Child Left Behind In Syria"…
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/03/phot…
The Neocons and Israel are all about co-opting the Arab Spring into the Neocon/Israeli Clean Break Plan of destroying the Middle East, all the time lying thru their teeth that they are 'idealistic', ;helping the poor Syrian people', or trying to 'secure themselves from Muslim weapons of mass destruction' as they do it
The Arab Spring in Palestine will destroy Apartheid in Israel – thus the Neocons/Israelis must co-opt the movement and turn it into civil wars and Islamic Winters everywhere they can
The Arab Winter, for such it must be called, was a Geostrategic Destabilisation to take control of the Arab world using Color Revolutions in 4 countries and a direct attack on a fifth. A fortune was spent on it (financial crisis at home) and had been planned for 10 years.
The Arab Winter WAS the implementation of the Clean Break plan by the Neo-Cons and is intended to enormously help the extreme Zionists around their mate Benji to implement One State solution.
Comment from Barak Obama – "Suckers!".
Obama, Kerry and Hagel, in blazers, and straw hats with canes – "There's One Born Every Minute!".
shame on you. who is goignt to arrest these war criminals? The world is waiting!