While officially NATO continues to maintain that the war in Libya was an overwhelming success, a “confidential” report conceded that there were major flaws in the air campaign and that the other allies were over-reliant on the US for support.
NATO has come under considerable fire for its refusal to investigate any of the civilian killings in the Libyan air war, having originally officially insisted that they didn’t happen and then just expressing “regret.”
The new report centers on operational failures, saying that in many cases the warplanes struggled mightily to identify actual targets on the ground, and failed to intercept large portions of the electronic communication in the country.
Officials familiar with the report said that it could make the case for a NATO war on Syria more difficult, as the nation will be an even bigger challenge, with better air defenses that would take “weeks” to destroy.
So that is what they call their humanitarian blood bath when the onslaught are getting out of hand, "flaws"…
Sodomizing and killing the leader of a sovereign but defenceless country and wiping out entire cities for revenge and the fun of it (and testing new military perversities) is what this remnant of times best forgotten, are doing best. May A F'ck Andersen and the other war criminals rot in eternity.
NATOs inhumanity bombing civilians target is always a “success”, NATO killing machinery is always a “sucess” and it started with Yugoslavian war killing innocent train passengers. NATO, when it come to their “sucesses” story, is always about how much of their killing machine can be sold to the highest bidder after the war, here you need to welcome the Swedish Junk air force (SAAB) which had few successes missions bombing few civilian housing complex calling it military target, in the other hand everything is a military target from the point of view of a militarism regime as NATO is.
The great oil robbery
NATO is being much to modest, for did not our beloved Western world gain full ownership of barrows in the billions of the absolutely highest quality of crude oil on earth? And how many of we exceptional white Westerners were killed in the process, how many even required a Band-Aid? Surely none, and just like our drone warfare, an overabundance of collateral slaughter that keeps all our troops out of harm’s way.
Empire perfection, that’s what I always say.
It was slaughter. There was no need for the military action. It was all a method to steal the wealth of hte people of Libya. Any other nation facing any United Nations action will remember that the United Nations is a useless organization and the head of the United Nations was a cheerleader for the slaughter in Libya. I guess he forgot the Libya was a member and it was the obligation to prevent military slaughter by the old colonial powers. I think it sure gave Syria reason to fear anything to cooperate with the old colonial powers. Those are bad but the missing weapons is going to really cause a fright in the future. There is very little good that came from this slaughter.
Even worse – since they could not occupy the towns of Sirte and Bani Walid, despite four weeks of permanent final attacks, NATO used thermobaric bombs, nicknamed the atomic bomb of the poor", because only a few rebels remained.
The BLU-118 FAE-bomb kills any life within an area of 2 square kilometres by burning or suffocate.
A family hiding in a shell proof basement has no chance. 1200 deaths was the result.
soure: http://www.algeria-isp.com/actualites/politique-libye/20...
The slaughter in Sirte http://wsws.org/articles/2011/oct2011/pers-o03.sh…
Libya: Sirte – NATO bombed residential complex, cruel war crimes
NATO bombing residential area in sirte ,extermination in sight libya
Libya: Sirte Inside – 9/17/2011, NATO criminals bomb civilian homes, Part 2
victims of NATO & Rebels in hospital of Sirte (graphic ): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVhcHLJKSaI
This was Sirte before the attack: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFD62FVkVmQ Speech of Gaddafi
They did want – as most Libyans – the wrong leader, so they got attacked, killed and their town destroyed. This is what BBC calls fight for democracy.
The UN-supervised elections offered by the Libyan government and Gaddafi (see
), even a new constitution, has been rejected!!!
They wanted war instead of elections. Not to mention that there is already a reasonable direct democratic system that fits excellently to the Libyan tribal structure:
libyan democracy
NATO needs to go, NATO needs to be demolished, the leader of NATO the Danish fascist Rasmussen needs to be put on trial for act against humanity and war crime so must be the case for the Swedish government entire staff from prim minister to the foreign minister of that country. So must be the case with French the NEO fascism Sarkozi, the Stupid Liberal Cameron.
The cases here are the chance for ICC to show that is not a biased, ignorant or an entity working entirely for US and NATO, ICC have the chance now to prove that is not nor being prejudice against Arabs and African nationals forgetting the real war criminals of the century.
ICC simply needs to prosecute these people, that is to say if they have any respect for international law and ICC principals when it was created, if ICC is not going to take any action then is better for ICC to close its own door and send their message to the world that they are no good no matter what is done by these (US-NATO) war criminals.