With the sudden interest in establishing a nuclear free Middle East exhibited by the West, the question of how this can be achieved with the only nuclear power in the region, Israel, not being a signatory to the NPT was inevitable. It is a question that IAEA chief Amano Yukiya has been asking very publicly.
The solution is unlikely to be forthcoming, as every time the issue is even broached with the Israeli government the reaction is shock and outrage, coupled with vows that the state will never join the treaty.
It will also be a tricky issue for the Obama Administration, which simultaneously condemned the IAEA vote calling for Israel to join the NPT as “unfair” and has publicly said they want Israel to join the NPT.
For Amano navigating the various conflicting US positions is going to be a dicey proposition, and doing so with the all-but-forbidden subject of Israel seems like an easy recipe for controversy.
I have to say that kind of action takes some courage. Let the railroading begin.
Unfair!….Unfair? that Israel, with over ( 200 nukes) should be instructed to join the NPT…..what!
Iran, however IS a member of the NPT, has NIL Nukes, as is threatened almost daily to possible "wipe you off the map" scenario by Israel and the US hawks. FM!
Even the most "dumded down, rednecked, racist, teabagger", should be able to work out that there is something seriously wrong here.
No nukes in OZ!
Unfair!….Unfair? that Israel, with over ( 200 nukes) should be instructed to join the NPT…..what!
Iran, however IS a member of the NPT, has NIL Nukes, as is threatened almost daily to possible "wipe you off the map" scenario by Israel and the US hawks. FM!
Even the most "dumded down, rednecked, racist, teabagger", should be able to work out that there is something seriously wrong here.
No nukes in OZ!