An inquiry by the Israeli Defense Forces into its soldiers murdering 15 Palestinian medics in Rafah last month dismissed its forces’ opening fire on the first responders.
The report by the IDF found that “professional failures” and “operational misunderstandings” were the cause of Israeli soldiers killing 15 Palestinian medics. It concluded the troops opened fire on the ambulances “after perceiving an immediate and tangible threat.”
On March 23, IDF soldiers in Rafah opened fire on a convoy of ambulances. Initially, Tel Aviv claimed that the vehicles were driving erratically and without their lights on. However, a video from one of the medics’ phones showed that the ambulances were driving with caution and were using their sirens.
After the massacre of the medics, most of whom worked for the Red Crescent, the IDF buried the victims and their vehicles in a mass grave. Once the crime scene was exhumed, autopsies showed most of the first responders were killed by bullets to the head or chest.
The report claimed the mass grave was not an effort at an IDF cover-up. “There was no attempt to conceal the event, which was discussed with international organizations and the UN, including coordination for the removal of bodies,” the IDF asserted.
Breaking the Silence, an organization of IDF veterans, called the report a “cover-up.” “The investigation is riddled with contradictions, vague phrasing, and selective details. The only ‘serious’ disciplinary action taken: the dismissal of the deputy commander of Golani’s elite unit.” The statement continued. “His reported ‘failure’ was submitting an incomplete account of the incident. In other words, he lied.”
The organization added, “We all remember when the IDF claimed that the ambulances’ emergency lights weren’t on — and then we saw the footage proving otherwise. Not every lie has a video to expose it, but this report doesn’t even attempt to engage with the truth.”
Over the past 18 months, the IDF has committed countless atrocities in Gaza. Most of the time, the mass killings of Palestinians by Israelis go unreported in Western media.
However, on a few occasions, IDF operations have come under scrutiny in the US. Tel Aviv has skirted any responsibility for the war crimes by investigating its forces and concluding there were errors made but no intentional or systemic wrongdoing.
Kyle Anzalone is the opinion editor of Antiwar.com and news editor of the Libertarian Institute. He hosts The Kyle Anzalone Show and is co-host of Conflicts of Interest with Connor Freeman.
Hamas, lay down your arms and release all the hostages. The option has been on the table for 18 months.
A war is not over until the last combatant is either dead or lays down his arms, followed by terms of surrender. Everything death in Gaza in on Hamas, who initiated this mess and could stop it at any time. Instead, they continue to hide among human shields.
The Israeli regime had the opportunity to get the rest of its hostages released, without even having to release all of its Palestinian hostages — and decided to go back to war instead.
Process could have begun on 8Oct.
The IDF had crossed a line that prevented negotiations at the time
The Hannibal Directive.
Addendum:
Muhammad Shehada @muhammadshehad2
19h
Israel's ex-Defence Minister says Hamas did Oct 7 & took Israeli captives to end Israel's illegal occupation
"Hamas] were speaking about Israel withdrawing from [the West Bank]… about how to divide Jerusalem… in return for a [hostage] deal"
Israel's Defence Minister knew Hamas "would do everything necessary to preserve the [lives of Israeli captives]" b/c that was "their insurance policy"
How does this square with Israel's claim (with ZERO evidence) that Hamas "murdered the Bibas kids with their bare hands"?
Muhammad Shehada * @muhammadshehad2
19h
Remember how @FranceskAlbs was viciously smeared by the US, Germany & France for saying Oct 7 victims "were not killed because of their Judaism, but in reaction to Israel's oppression"?
Israel's own defence minister is admitting this!
Condemn Oct 7 all you want, but be honest about why it happened & what its goal was!
PS. This is not to deny atrocities committed on this day (Israel committed a thousand fold more atrocities in Gaza than anything they alleged or documented to have happened on Oc t7)
https://x.com/aaronjmate/status/1914058925055397889
The Zionists initiated this mess and could stop it at any time.
The 2017 Hamas Charter accepted a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/92a2726fbd09be5224141bc502e25c727aeba9dc1da079d56fb45215e9474c31.jpg
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/b76507854f7d0ffdccb830ed1f62a2932c030d0c475b8f486d89b20ea3db779a.png
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d8bb81db6a4a7423987aada49be5b7ab2b88b06c132f64f27af0a036a11aaf98.png
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/9fefdc1e9d3da04410bc3f32e83d5c946e644ddc6ffa3333014b055aab471e14.jpg
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e747eef25e4494dfcf4a9d856f62eb2895772c0610eac0ac48f68eef3ee0201a.png
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/d8abd0a543c31d1e54f27fead066c5dff0784828a97e89ccc2c16d68367b21fa.jpg
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a1f51683ef3a48b30ce3b34970c84667855418f37299aae38b585cd8fdbc6100.jpg
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7f0981c74cb666366d0e0402659137c45950453be58d0d0a2f45a8815a278618.jpg
That is a lot of propaganda pictures to continue supporting Hamas. If Israelis ever put down their arms, there would be no Israel and the banner of Israel would fly unopposed over 100% of the Middle East and North African land mass.
"The 2017 Hamas Charter accepted a Palestinian state on the 1967 borders."—–Hamas announced their revised charter, which claims to accept the idea of a Palestinian state within the 1967 borders, but without recognizing Israel's right to exist. —–Did that pass any international standard for statehood?
Hamas gave up that option a very long time ago and cannot dismiss all the terror they have perpetuated over the decades and them claim some kind of victory.
Propaganda pictures? Bullshit. You cannot dismiss the 76 years of terror Israel has perpetuated on Palestinians, in violation of international law.
The Israeli military forced an 80-year-old Palestinian man to act as a human shield in Gaza by tying an explosive cord around his neck and forcing him to scout buildings. After eight hours, soldiers ordered the man and his wife to flee, but when another Israeli battalion spotted the elderly couple on the street, they were shot dead on the spot, according to Israeli soldiers present at the scene.
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/2025-02-16/ty-article/idf-reportedly-used-elderly-gazan-as-human-shield-tied-explosive-around-his-neck/00000195-0e56-d1b4-a7fd-cf7742bf0000
Netanyahu gave up the ceasefire deal when his fascist orange puppet became POTUS.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8a6de3e202ada8be4aa937bb3e39619fd44b8b2d534bdb7bc04218e7f96d17fe.jpg
Just go back to your basement
"That is a lot of propaganda pictures to continue supporting Hamas."
Oh look…
…lil' pee stain just smeared another Antiwar poster as a Hamas supporter…and of spreading Hamas "propaganda"…
…right when the Trump admin is locking up pro-Palestine voices, and voices condemning Israel, here in the U.S. And that's the purpose of his smears:
Lil' pee wants to shut up US citizens. 'Cept it's not working – support for his war criminal policies keeps falling – in Israel and US, despite the below Hasbara: https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/276f800be052b0fd84634b7897eab3c25a298a05eff4a21043d2564bf211f675.png
"If Israelis ever put down their arms, there would be no Israel and the banner of Israel would fly unopposed over 100% of the Middle East and North Afr-"
If no Israel, "banner of Israel would fly" everywhere?
I mean this is too funny – the lil' piss stain can't even get his plagiarisms right.
Antiwar will never publish this—-
Statement of the International Criminal Court (ICC) Prosecutor Karim A.A. Khan KC:
On the basis of evidence collected and examined by my Office, I have reasonable grounds to believe that Yahya SINWAR (Head of the Islamic Resistance Movement (“Hamas”) in the Gaza Strip), Mohammed Diab Ibrahim AL-MASRI, more commonly known as DEIF (Commander-in-Chief of the military wing of Hamas, known as the Al-Qassam Brigades), and Ismail HANIYEH (Head of Hamas Political Bureau) bear criminal responsibility for the following war crimes and crimes against humanity committed on the territory of Israel and the State of Palestine (in the Gaza strip) from at least 7 October 2023:
Extermination as a crime against humanity, contrary to article 7(1)(b) of the Rome Statute;
Murder as a crime against humanity, contrary to article 7(1)(a), and as a war crime, contrary to article 8(2)(c)(i);
Taking hostages as a war crime, contrary to article 8(2)(c)(iii);
Rape and other acts of sexual violence as crimes against humanity, contrary to article 7(1)(g), and also as war crimes pursuant to article 8(2)(e)(vi) in the context of captivity;
Torture as a crime against humanity, contrary to article 7(1)(f), and also as a war crime, contrary to article 8(2)(c)(i), in the context of captivity;
Other inhumane acts as a crime against humanity, contrary to article 7(l)(k), in the context of captivity;
Cruel treatment as a war crime contrary to article 8(2)(c)(i), in the context of captivity; and
Outrages upon personal dignity as a war crime, contrary to article 8(2)(c)(ii), in the context of captivity.
My Office submits that the war crimes alleged in these applications were committed in the context of an international armed conflict between Israel and Palestine, and a non-international armed conflict between Israel and Hamas running in parallel. We submit that the crimes against humanity charged were part of a widespread and systematic attack against the civilian population of Israel by Hamas and other armed groups pursuant to organisational policies. Some of these crimes, in our assessment, continue to this day.
You act as if you uncovered some deep hidden truth. Yes, Hamas targeted noncombatants which is a crime. This fact in no way justifies Israel’s decades of murder and land theft. It also fails as a justification for Israel’s genocidal response since October 7th. Only a broken moral compass points this direction.
There has not been and Israeli or Israeli settlement in Gaza since 2005, and it appeased no one, as Hamas rockets began to rain down on Israel within weeks.
Every Hamas rocket fired into Israel has been an act of war with the known Israeli response.
Quit obfuscating. Answer the charges of 76 years of Israeli murder and land theft. I am genuinely interested in the quality of your hasbara.
—
—
This is easily your most insightful comment to date.
You are still batting zero.
Zero.
What ethnic group came up the the concept of "zero"?
Ancient Mesopotania and India.
Yes
The two state solution was offered in 1947, One chose to build a viable nation and Arabs chose war and lost. And every time they chose war, they lose another piece of the pie.
The refusal by the Arab population of the mandated territory to accept UN Partition Resolution 181 (1947) demonstrated that Palestinian Arabs were not interested in establishing their own state if it meant allowing the existence of a non-Arab, non-Muslim state. -This opposition to acknowledging the right of an Israeli state to exist still lies at the core of the conflict 77 years later.
Have a nice holiday
UNR 181 having never been repealed, that second state remains not only on offer, but in actual existence, with recognition by most UN member states, observer membership in the UN, membership in Interpol and the International Criminal Court, etc.
And the borders in UNR 181, agreed to by Israel as a condition of UN membership, remain the only UN-recognized borders of either state.
Wars change things! Lets get real with Middle East and North African history–
Since the invention of Islam, Arabs have a historical track record. Egyptians were not Arab, nor did they speak Arabic. Syrians (Assyrians) were not Arabs, nor did they speak Arabic. Moroccans, Libyans, and Tunisia (Berbers) were not Arabs, nor did they speak Arabic. Iraqis (Kurds, Assyrians, Armenians, Azides, etc) were not Arabs nor did they speak Arabic, Libya was not Arab, nor did they speak Arabic. The Sudan (tribal Africa) was not Arab, nor did they speak Arabic, Tunisia was not Arab, nor did they speak Arabic. Question: Why are they all called "Arab" Countries, Arab States, belong to the League of “Arab” Nations, and have to live under some form of Islamic Sharia?
Speaking of history, can you name the country that was founded on the genocide of one race and the enslavement of another?
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/0c7719f70aa3b42f7607989fee930a601a891b596fe5e4404bd15cbf7be17041.jpg
They are known as war criminals.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7f008b1880b4c8c32ffc3da4366353d06f8122a8246d827e523a56ab185bfb84.jpg
Manifest Destiny, a phrase coined in 1845, is the idea that the United States is destined—by God, its advocates believed—to expand its dominion and spread democracy, capitalism, and Christianity across the entire North American continent. The philosophy drove 19th-century U.S. territorial expansion and was used to justify the forced removal of Native Americans and other groups from their homes. The rapid expansion of the United States intensified the issue of slavery as new states were added to the Union, leading to the outbreak of the Civil War.
What Country do you live in? I would not want you to be a hypocrite! Please do not dodge the question
President Polk.
The American Army provoked the Mexicans into responding to their territory being invaded.
Prior, the Las Nueces was considered the border between the American states and Mexico.
Crossing the Rio Grande, what D.C. alleged was the "true" border and into the Mexican territory, the Mexicans responded.
Word got back to D.C.about the "dastardly" attack by the Mexicans, just as Polk desired it to be, and the "war" was on.
For Manifest Destiny, "enterprise".
It was not just the Native Americans that the "white devils" murdered and stole lands from.
History shows the violence of the fascist Christian-Right. Christianity is the cornerstone of white supremacy in the United States. Racist attitudes are ingrained in the DNA of the Religious-Right white Christian identity.
The Church's role in the genocide of Native Americans and the enslavement of Africans was immense. Christians—from evangelicals in the South to mainline Protestants in the Midwest and Catholics in the North East have not just been complacent or complicit; rather, as the dominant cultural power, they have constructed and sustained a project of protecting white supremacy and opposing black equality that has framed the entire American story.
Many Christian ministers and theologians taught that whites were the Chosen people, blacks were cursed to be servants, and God supported racial segregation.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1e50a8e16409301f34364155a3fd50ced9e3be4755f79195244e71b75addd823.png
Lots of countries in the past did that, it was the norm. The US and UK just did it in more modern times. It's still going on in Africa as I type.
Genocide is not the "norm" in the 21st century.
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/documents/atrocity-crimes/Doc.1_Convention%20on%20the%20Prevention%20and%20Punishment%20of%20the%20Crime%20of%20Genocide.pdf
It’s becoming the norm, parts of Africa are committing tribal and religious genocide. The Balkans are peaceful for now, but genocide is a national past time in those countries.
Yes, wars change things.
None of the wars since 1949 have changed Israel’s agreement to accept the UNR 181 borders as a condition of UN membership.
So what? Israel is a nation. If the UN wants to kick them out for not meeting the condition of UN membership that is up to the UN. It does not change the fact Israel exists as a nation. Vatican City is a nation and not a member of the UN. So is Taiwan.
Yes, Israel is a state (“nation” is a fuzzier term). Did I deny that?
Did I call for the UN to kick Israel out? No. I simply pointed out that its borders are what they are, not something else.
The Israeli regime wants all the benefits of UN membership, and of being recognized as a state by other states, without any of the obligations. Many other regimes play the same game.
Not true! 2000 Camp David Summit – Barak offered to withdraw from 97 percent of the West Bank and 100 percent of the Gaza Strip. In addition, he agreed to dismantle 63 isolated settlements. In exchange for the 3 percent annexation of the West Bank, Israel would increase the size of the Gaza territory by roughly a third. Barak also made previously unthinkable concessions on Jerusalem, agreeing that Arab neighborhoods of East Jerusalem would become the capital of the new state. The Palestinians would maintain control over their holy places and have “religious sovereignty” over the Temple Mount. The proposal also guaranteed Palestinian refugees the right of return to the Palestinian state and reparations from a $30 billion international fund that would be collected to compensate them. —Arafat turned it down without a counter offer. He wanted the right of return for 4 to 5 million Palestinian so-called Arab refugees into Israel proper, which is not mathematically feasible and Arafat knew it. Camp David was the best offer Arafat was ever going to get. Obviously a very bad choice to keep the status quo and begin more attacks on Israel. Very bad choice!
That’s what the Palestinians get for outsourcing their negotiations to an Egyptian.
This is the American Israeli version of events. However, it wasn't a viable, independent state that was being offered. The West Bank was still to have Israeli control over its borders and settlement blocks. Keeping East Jerusalem for Israel was a nonstarter. The holy sites arrangement was an Israeli play on words. Muslims would have control above ground of their holy sites but Israel would maintain sovereignty underground. The problem with the refugee issue is that its an issue of standing. Even if i accept it as a Palestinian, how can I give up the right of a Palestinian who lived in Israel proper and was kicked out never to return? Finally, Arafat consulted Mubarak, Kings Abdullah of Jordan and Fahad of Saudi Arabia asking them to sign off on the deal. They all refused to do so.
@knappster:disqus@peepsqueek:disqus@disqus_qhuce9v5DO:disqus@sambor71:disqus@disqus_xsWgG5BaoX:disqus@warsrus:disqus@disqus_WXsl4CCjPi:disqus@renatelittlejohn:disqus@disqus_ky8vtfPjLn:disqus@lilysandoz:disqus@existentialdread:disqus@disqus_jzsK7ljwo3:disqus@disqus_lbkuZ0DrY6:disqus
"And the borders in UNR 181, " No borders were mention in that agreement, just boundaries.
No even a good try.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/30db9e5c57f6d47687522a793c819fcceedb0637d5b3fdcb1988e529db6772f5.jpg https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/e92c8ce3748e9ae87ee25e0b5b0b81db7895ece76f39a742ba8a4bd525e52b79.jpg
Rahn Emanuel's father was a member to the Irgun. (may not mean anything, just thought I would mention it because he has been involved in U.S. politics for a long time.
The Irgun was a political predecessor to Israel's right-wing Herut (or "Freedom") party, which led to today's Likud party. Likud has led or been part of most Israeli governments since 1977.
Low quality Hasbara, as I suspected. Get a better dealer. Resolution 181 conferred zero legal status on the foundation of Israel as Jeremy Hammond details here: https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2010/10/26/the-myth-of-the-u-n-creation-of-israel/
More to the point Israel had zero moral authority to steal land they did not own and remove 750K people living on their land. THEIR land. The sum total is that Israel was founded illegally and has behaved as an uncivilized conqueror ever since. Your argument fails, both legally and morally.
Despite that the Palestinians have agreed to a two-state solution that sees them get only 22% of the land Israel agreed to. Yet, we see Israel repeatedly refuse to grant to the indigenous population of this area anything resembling a sovereign state. Israel is the aggressor and the perpetrator of the moral atrocity of the 21st. century. Nice company you keep, moral feral child.
In the year 1900 there were only 53 independent nations on the planet. Today there are nearly 200. How did that happen? And 57 of them are declared Muslim States. How did that happen? And you bit itch about tiny Israel have one independent state??
In the year 1900 there were only 53 independent nations on the planet. Today there are nearly 200. How did that happen? And 57 of them are declared Muslim States. How did that happen? And you bit itch about tiny Israel have one independent state??
Please do not dodge the questions?
Twenty years before that date, Zionists came up the the term "antisemitism", a term that has been weaponized, threatening the American citizen with deportation, based on the whims of a body politic that is hostage to the Zionist in Israel at this date.
What did the new State of Israel do? Massive land grab.
At the time, the UN stated that Israel did not have all of the requisites to become the State of Israel.
Hence UN determined that the Palestinians had the right to return to their properties. Denied by Israel since.
Until the pie turns full circle and Israel ends up with nothing. It doesn't matter how long it takes now. The historical start day for the collapse of Israel will be etched in the history books as October 7, 2023.
@knappster:disqus@disqus_qhuce9v5DO:disqus@sambor71:disqus@disqus_xsWgG5BaoX:disqus@warsrus:disqus@disqus_WXsl4CCjPi:disqus@renatelittlejohn:disqus@disqus_ky8vtfPjLn:disqus@lilysandoz:disqus@existentialdread:disqus@disqus_jzsK7ljwo3:disqus@disqus_lbkuZ0DrY6:disqus
For 76 years Palestinians have been trying to destroy the state of Israel and for 76 years Israel has been killing the Palestinians that have been killing Israel citizens.
You have the amount of time that the killing has been going on correct. After that you derail. It is Israel with the greater power (courtesy of the US taxpayer) and it is Israel that is demonstrably the aggressor. While not excusing any war crimes committed by the Palestinians, clearly the greater moral opprobrium must fall upon Israel.
Sure, and if they happen to kill tens of thousands of innocent Palestinians that AREN'T killing Israeli citizens, oh well.
Before the Zionists, Jews and Palestinians lived in peace.
How were the Palestinians trying to destroy the state of Israel for 76 years, with no army, no air force, no navy, no 2,000 lb bombs, no chemical weapons?
Zionism had been a thing for quite some time before the definition of “Palestinian” became anything other than “Jew born in Palestine.”
The Zionist movement dates from the late 19th century, so it doesn’t explain e.g. the anti-Jewish pogroms of 1834 in Nablus, Herbon, Bethlehem and Safed, or the anti-Jewish pogrom of 1838 in Safed,
There has been a long span of peaceful coexistence between Arabs and Jews. Omar Ibn Al Khattab brought back Jewish families to live in the Old City of Jerusalem in the 7th century. Saladin brought them back after the Crusaders had kicked them out. The pogroms mentioned are nothing more than tribal feuds that Muslims, Christians, Chinese and Europeans and others have had with one another.
Actually, the violence was a result of the upheaval at the time between the Ottomans and Ali Pasha. The Arabs who were being heavily taxed and conscripted were resentful that the Ottomans were treating the Jews as a protected class. (something I am afraid may happen one day in the US when Americans wake up to the reality of how Jewish people were favored over others).
It is odd that so much peaceful coexistence would be minimized as if the pogroms were common. A finite group of people, in a finite time and place(s) committed violence. Those instances mentioned do not reflect the norm.
So what do you think explains the pogroms of 1834 and 1838?
I have no interest in “explaining” those particular pogroms. I was just pointing out that this constantly recycled claim that there was “peace” between Arabs and Jews, or in the Middle East generally, until Zionism, is pure-D unadulterated horseshit.
I have no interest in “explaining” those particular pogroms. I was just pointing out that this constantly recycled claim that there was “peace” between Arabs and Jews, or in the Middle East generally, until Zionism, is pure-D unadulterated horseshit.
I'm surprised by the response. No one is claiming that Jews and Arabs lived in perfect harmony — both communities, like all human groups, have experienced conflict, politics, and rivalry. But in the Muslim world, Jews historically lived under the "dhimmi" system, which — despite its limitations — offered protected status, religious freedom, and civil rights that were often denied to Jews in Christian Europe. Muslims could eat their food, marry their women, and live beside them. That kind of social integration simply didn’t exist in the West, where Jews faced deep, systemic, and often violent "antisemitism."
The 1834 and 1838 incidents cited were not racial pogroms in the European mold — they were part of wider revolts against Ottoman and Egyptian rule, driven by oppressive taxation and conscription policies. The violence was local, political, and tied to state collapse — not a reflection of entrenched Jew-hatred.
What’s happening now is a dangerous inversion. The West — with its long legacy of antisemitism — projects its guilt by backing Israel to the hilt, at the direct expense of Arabs and Muslims. The message is clear: Jews can’t live safely among us, so let’s give them dominance elsewhere — even if it means endless war and occupation.
And this extends even to how speech is policed. On this forum, any post that contains the word "Jew" — even without context — is automatically flagged for review and often removed. Posts with “Muslim,” on the other hand, pass through freely, despite Muslims being far more demonized and attacked in today’s world. If this level of protection is extended only to one group, it reinforces the same Western logic: Jews must be protected because we fear what *we* might do to them — but Muslims? Not worth the same concern.
That’s not justice. That’s guilt masquerading as morality.
@knappster:disqus@peepsqueek:disqus@disqus_qhuce9v5DO:disqus@sambor71:disqus@disqus_xsWgG5BaoX:disqus@warsrus:disqus@disqus_WXsl4CCjPi:disqus@renatelittlejohn:disqus@disqus_ky8vtfPjLn:disqus@lilysandoz:disqus@existentialdread:disqus@disqus_jzsK7ljwo3:disqus@disqus_lbkuZ0DrY6:disqus
I’m surprised that you’re surprised that I’d point out that no, the Middle East was not some kind of magical peacenik utopia prior to the Zionist movement.
“And this extends even to how speech is policed. On this forum, any post that contains the word ‘Jew’ — even without context — is automatically flagged for review and often removed. Posts with ‘Muslim,’ on the other hand, pass through freely, despite Muslims being far more demonized and attacked in today’s world.”
Antiwar.com is a microcosm of “today’s world,” and in that microcosm, guidelines-violating posts regarding Jews are much more frequent than guidelines-violating posts regarding Muslims. If the latter happens to increase, then related terms will likewise trigger a human look before posting instead of anti-Muslim posts just being removed a la carte when they occur. In fact, that does occasionally and temporarily happen, but the “I HATE the ISLAMS” types tend to be less persistent and frequent than the “I HATE THE JEWS” types.
“If this level of protection is extended only to one group”
It isn’t. That you only happen to notice the “protection” related to Jews is not evidence that other kinds of “protection” don’t exist. Without even going to look at the list of “human moderator must check” triggers, I can tell you that a number of terms used to describe persons of various African and Asian ethnicities are also included. But we’re far more likely to get a visit from Daily Stormer trolls than from e.g. Pamela Geller cultists.
And the “protection” isn’t really for the “groups” involved. It’s for the site. The people who run the site have decided what kinds of content they do and do not want to host, and have acted accordingly.
"I'm surprised that you're surprised that I'd point out that no, the Middle East was not some kind of magical peacenik utopia prior to the Zionist movement."
Tom, you know that wasn't my point. I'll let the readers judge.
Yes, I know it wasn’t YOUR point. I was replying to the previous commenter who pulled out the whole “the Middle East was just one big campfire round of Kum Ba Ya until the Zionists showed up” thing. As the cradle of civilization, a global crossroads, the birthplace of several major religions, etc., that region has never known peace, at least since humans arrived.
Lol… Tom I just have to keep remembering that you often function as a dispassionate moderator. However, a lot of the turmoil you mention can be attributed as you said to the fact that it is the "cradle" of civilizations, a cross roads between east west trade (a coveted region for outside empires, e.g., roman) and a target of western imperialism and colonialism in the modern period.) Most peaceful times in the aggregate were under "indigenous" Persian and Muslim rule. People are people they mostly want peace and economic prosperity. Domination, greed, racism get in the way.
Zionism had been a thing for quite some time before the definition of “Palestinian” became anything other than “Jew born in Palestine.”
The Zionist movement dates from the late 19th century, so it doesn’t explain e.g. the anti-Jewish pogroms of 1834 in Nablus, Herbon, Bethlehem and Safed, or the anti-Jewish pogrom of 1838 in Safed,
Zionism had been a thing for quite some time before the definition of “Palestinian” became anything other than “Jew born in Palestine.”
The Zionist movement dates from the late 19th century, so it doesn’t explain e.g. the anti-Jewish pogroms of 1834 in Nablus, Herbon, Bethlehem and Safed, or the anti-Jewish pogrom of 1838 in Safed,
And if you ever want to know how this Spartan state will end…. It was conceived by the sword and chooses to die by the Sword.
@peepsqueek:disqus
"For 76 years Palestinians have been trying to destroy the state of Israel"
'Ma! Ma! I made a friend today! A fascist racist dual loyalty genocide fan!
All I had to do was puke up a buncha' lying shit – pretending the PLO accepting the state of Israel and renouncing violence and Oslo and everything leading up to it had never happened!
LOL. Look how these people have such low self esteem. Yes the Palestinians always resisted the theft of their land, the occupation, the murder and the humiliation. However, there was not one day that they ever came close to threatening nuclear armed-US backed Israel. Yet, they pretend to be the victims. Israel was conceived by the sword and people like this will ensure that it will perish by the sword.
@knappster:disqus@peepsqueek:disqus@disqus_qhuce9v5DO:disqus@sambor71:disqus@disqus_xsWgG5BaoX:disqus@warsrus:disqus@warsrus:disqus@disqus_WXsl4CCjPi:disqus@renatelittlejohn:disqus@disqus_ky8vtfPjLn:disqus@lilysandoz:disqus@existentialdread:disqus@disqus_jzsK7ljwo3:disqus@disqus_lbkuZ0DrY6:disqus
Every Zionist lie is an act of genocide.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/acd5e58f02a5bf29f0897e5cc83e34b1d8995b5a6f4954c53e25c6c02555cab4.png
Sure, Palestinians had a "place".
More like a concentration camp or cattle corral for 75 years.
What kind of "place" is it where other parties can invade, abduct persons, shoot persons, destroy food, contaminate water?
And now, Zionists parties in Tel Aviv want that "place" and are killing women and children at an alarming rate to get it.
Bombing tent encampments is the most cowardly act I have ever heard of.
Par for the course.
Hamas stumbled onto the rave concert that was approved several days before 7Oct.
Why? If the Mossad knew of the plans by Hamas one year in advance, and knew the base that was on the same road was one of the targets, why approve of a rave adjacent to that road.
Why was troop strength low?
How many current (at the time) and former IDF reservists were at the rave?
Most important question: how many Israelis were killed by the IDF during the implementation of the Hannibal Directive?
Final question: was there a prior plan of genocide, ethnic cleansing by Netanyahu & Co.?
The knowledge of the plans by Hamas presented a golden opportunity for the Zionists in the Israeli administration to carry out what had been desired since Zabotinsky. Or before, when the Zionists first used the term "antisemitism" in 1880. That term has been super weaponized to the extent that U.S. citizens may be deported from the use over words, particularly the word "antisemitism".
Antiwar.com reported it, with quotes and detail, on May 20, 2024, and probably other times.
The Antiwar article completely omitted that part I posted word for word. –Nice try!
The Antiwar article accurately reported the fact of the report, and the allegations in the report. I don’t recall that the site did any more, or any less, for the parts of the report alleging Israeli crimes.
It wasn’t just a nice try. It was establishing that you either lied, or just didn’t bother to find out the facts, before making your claim.
I’d encourage you to try harder, but I’m beginning to suspect you’re a paid troll who gets compensated on volume, not quality.
As long you now know that the ICC acknowledges who initiated this mess and what Israel is responding to, even if they think Israel is going to far to win this war.
Israel has not gone far enough as Hama (a terrorist organization) has neither laid down their arms or released all the hostages.
The "mess" was initiated in 1948 with the massacres (Deir Yassin the most known), the driving of 700,000+ Palestinians from their homes.
A long time festering wound.
Israel (a terrorist organization) has neither laid down its arms nor released all its hostages either.
It seems likely that both terrorist organizations will remain armed, and continue to hold hostages, for the forseeable future.
"the ICC acknowledges who initiated this mess and what Israel is responding to"?
That is a lie. That misrepresents what the ICC wrote. The ICC does not say 'Hamas "initiated" it, and Israel is only "responding to" its crimes.'
Instead – vs. saying, 'One party started this' – the ICC deliberately put both Israel's and Hamas' crimes in the "context" a greater, ongoing "armed conflict."
That is why the ICC used identical, 'non-cause-effect' language to frame both parties' crimes:
"the war crimes alleged in these applications were committed in the context of an international armed conflict between Israel and Palestine, and a non-international armed conflict between Israel and Hamas (together with other Palestinian Armed Groups) running in parallel." [ICC website, 5/24]
The ICC "think[s] Israel is going to far to win this war."
On display, folks, the real deal: the true mentality of today's Israeli right – the fanatical genocide Zionists:
On the one hand, 'Look, Hamas committed great crimes – the International Criminal COURT says so!'
On the other hand, 'ICC "thinks Israel is going too far"…
…'thinks israel is going too far': a sleazebag evasion of admitting the court found Israel guilty of high war crimes, thus Netanyahu/Gallant arrest warrants…
…But, in this view, 'Israel is above the law – Israel acts with impunity. So we can dismiss the same court's judgment of multiple Israeli war crimes – including plausible genocide – in the same legal statement'…
…In fact – Israel war crimes – the targeted mass murder and starvation to death of noncombatant Gazans – has "not gone far enough"!
He is.
Perhaps a university student paid his shekels to pound away on his computer keyboard.
Maybe he is, maybe he isn't. But his copy and paste repetition, along with his reliance on AI to generate comments that he can't even be bothered to edit to make look like his own work, at least makes him suspect.
"I'm beginning to suspect you're a paid troll who gets compensated on volume, not quality."
Note that this would explain why "peepsqueek" defies community standards, refusing to admit he does not write most of what he posts, & refusing to post links:
Because his "paid troll" job requires a minimum of independent propaganda text – not just random quotes alternated w/repeating one-sentence propaganda slogans ('Hamas only has to lay down its arms,' e.g.).
Basically, looks like peepsqueek is thieving from his employer – and deleting quote marks/links to hide it.
[ADDENDUM: What I wrote above is as likely wrong: US-Israel propaganda mills don't care about a 'minimum of independently written' propaganda:
"volume, not quality" and repeated talking points are all that counts – and leaving out quote marks or links is faster & creates the illusion of 'an individual pov' vs. 'a propaganda product.']
LOL
Yahya Sinwar is dead.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/4d7ecf6acf18df7d2618a6f4448c2e2ccc91022d663dfe0a58123ca3ef147e4a.jpg
U.N. General Assembly:
* Reaffirms the legitimacy of the struggle of peoples for their independence, territorial integrity, national unity and liberation from colonial domination, apartheid and foreign occupation by all available means, including armed struggle.
* Strongly condemns those Governments that do not recognize the right to self-determination and independence of all peoples still under colonial domination and alien subjugation, notably the people of Palestine.
First they murdered the negotiators.
Hamas has had a pattern of hiding among human shields. IDF soldiers have been killed in the past for being too cautious. I have been to war and we even shot some of our own men for being in the wrong place at the wrong time. It is one of the tragedies of war.
Hamas initiated this mess on October 7th 2023 to deliberately and intentionally invite Israel into Gaza. Hamas will not deny this. They knew that if they murdered enough Israelis and took hundreds of hostages of all ages, Israel would have to respond in a very aggressive manner.
Zionists have a pattern of blatant lies and violations of international law.
Israel initiated their genocidal ethnic cleansing program in 1947. The Nakba never ended.
He is entitled to his opinion, but once you bring God into this, you bring in the BS. God is just a concept not a person.
As for your ignorant genocide comment. 2019 Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS) had reported ahead of the 71st anniversary of the 1948 war that the number of Palestinians has increased by nine times since 1948. Wow, some ethnic cleansing! –sarcasm intended
Two million Palestinian Arabs live in Israel proper as citizens on land that hypocritical activists say is ethnically cleansed. How long can you use the ethnically cleansed card? There are Palestinian Arabs living as house owners in places that you claim were taken from other Palestinian Arabs. How do you want to balance those scales?
"Once you bring God into this, you bring in the bullshit."
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8313250e4ba144191e5ce32026d95aa4dc115ebdb9d249b2258bb36807666245.jpg
Until World War II, anti-Zionism was widespread among Jews for varying reasons. Orthodox Jews opposed Zionism on religious grounds, as preempting the Messiah, while secular Jews felt uncomfortable with the idea that Jewish peoplehood was a national or ethnic identity.
Your ignorance of history is astounding.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/1022c6e94e94654005de4830993065ff0086367da75ab60389e8afda8f4a481d.jpg
The ultra orthodox are just another religious cult. They want to live in Israel, but didn't build it or fight to protect it. And they do and say a lot of stupid shit when they get angry. Israel should get rid of them for their own health.
Zionism is not a cult?
Zionism is a racist settler-colonialist movement which opportunistically co-opts aspects of Judaism in an attempt to justify its criminal practices of apartheid and genocide of indigenous Palestinians.
Zionism is a murderous cult. And they do tend to spew a lot of stupid shit when they get angry. You do it well.
Early Zionists syncretized many aspects of European fascism, white supremacy, colonialism and messianic Evangelism and had a long and sordid history of cooperating with anti-Semites, imperialists and fascists in order to promote exclusivist and expansionist agendas.
Why are secular Jews (Zionists) using the Biblical texts, specifically calling any person or country that does not agree with them "Amalek"??
Again this is why you are not respected. 76 years after ethnic cleansing, Israel is trying to finish off the job. The problem is they are failing miserably. Things are coming full circle since Oct. 7th with Israeli rage and now bombing savagely because they can't defeat Hamas. Even as genociders, they're utter failures.
Boy, you are full of more crap than a Christmas goose.
How is university going?
This is why I have no respect for you. You parrot lies, ignore the facts and you justify the slaughter of innocents. And when you say you have been to war, which one exactly?
@knappster:disqus@peepsqueek:disqus@disqus_qhuce9v5DO:disqus@sambor71:disqus@disqus_xsWgG5BaoX:disqus@warsrus:disqus@disqus_WXsl4CCjPi:disqus@renatelittlejohn:disqus@disqus_ky8vtfPjLn:disqus@lilysandoz:disqus@existentialdread:disqus@disqus_jzsK7ljwo3:disqus@disqus_lbkuZ0DrY6:disqus
OK. The IDF has admitted to murdering 15 non combatant Palestinians. That only leaves another 50,000 or more for them to admit to killing.
The actual count is much higher.
Admitting professional failures for the act.
OK
but what about the subsequent lying?
Those were "professional successes".
Take heed terrorist organizations. It's just "professional failures" henceforth. Of course you might not get away with it. /s
It is a criminal act. A war crime not professional failures.
"Israel killed 15 Palestinian paramedics and rescue workers one by one, says UN
Workers on a mission to help colleagues were buried in mass grave in southern Gaza, says humanitarian office"
According to the UN humanitarian affairs office (Ocha), the Palestinian Red Crescent (PRCS) and civil defence workers were on a mission to rescue colleagues who had been shot at earlier in the day, when their clearly marked vehicles came under heavy Israeli fire in Rafah city’s Tel al-Sultan district. A Red Crescent official in Gaza said that there was evidence of at least one person being detained and killed, as the body of one of the dead had been found with his hands tied.
The shootings happened on 23 March, one day into the renewed Israeli offensive in the area close to the Egyptian border. Another Red Crescent worker on the mission is reported missing.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/mar/31/israel-killed-15-palestinian-paramedics-and-rescue-workers-one-by-one-says-un
Okay, so 'professional failures'. What are the consequences for those failures- have or will any of those involved be charged and punished? Will any of them be handed a Bad Conduct Discharge? I'm guessing not one word of it will be reflected in their records and, as far as the IDF is concerned, it never happened.
"peepsqueek 2 days ago
You deficient characters can only make it about me, but cannot gi–"
Very good, lil' piss stain! You joined 15 words without plagiarizing!
Israeli soldier tells CBS News he was ordered to use Palestinians as human shields in Gaza
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israeli-soldier-palestinians-human-shields-gaza/
Israeli army forced elderly man to scout buildings with an explosive cord tied around his neck, before he was later shot dead along with his wife.
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/2/16/israeli-soldiers-used-80-year-old-palestinian-as-gaza-human-shield-report
Hannibal Orders is a war crime, everything goes.
"Israeli soldier tells CBS News he was ordered to use Palestinians as human shields in Gaza"
And this soldier's report is not an exception to the rule: multiple investigatory bodies have examined the evidence and judged that Israeli use of Palestinians as human shields is a prevalent and historical Israeli military tactic.
Below, Owen Jones clearly reviews the historical record – also noting that the same investigative bodies – though critical of Hamas on various grounds – have repeatedly judged that there is no pattern of Hamas using human shields…
…ie, Jones not only exposes Israel's crimes, but debunks the 'human shield' justification for Israel's mass murder of Gaza noncombatants:
That is nothing but BS. The IDF people knew what they were doing, they are not so stupid or untrained not to know better.
Take your report… roll it up… and shove it up your arse…!
Israel ADMITS BIG COVERUP In Medic Massacre.