Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that President Donald Trump will decide if ending the war in Ukraine is possible sometime in the coming days.
“We’re not going to continue with this endeavor for weeks and months on end. So we need to determine very quickly now, and I’m talking about a matter of days, whether or not this is doable in the next few weeks,” Rubio told reporters in Paris.
President Trump made ending the war in Ukraine one of his top campaign promises. Since taking office in January, his staff has engaged in several rounds of high-level talks with Russian and Ukrainian officials.
“The president feels very strongly about that. He has dedicated a lot of time and energy to this… this is important, but there are a lot of other really important things going on that deserve just as much, if not more attention,” Rubio said.
Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, who is leading the American negotiations, told Fox News host Sean Hannity that talks with Russia were progressing well. In an interview that aired Monday, he explained, “This is the third meeting I’ve had with [Putin]. This last meeting lasted close to five hours. It was a compelling meeting, and towards the end, we actually came up with a path to a permanent peace.”
However, Trump and Rubio have stated that Russia is not engaging quickly enough in the diplomatic process. The president and secretary of state have both threatened new sanctions on Russia in recent weeks if the Kremlin does not agree to a deal to end the conflict very soon.
Moscow appears to be unwilling to accelerate the pace of talks on ending the war in Ukraine. Earlier this week, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the issue was “so complex that it’s unrealistic to expect immediate results.”
Following the invasion of Ukraine in 2022, US-Russian relations sank to a historic low point, with almost no contact between Washington and Russia during that period. Early rounds of talks between US and Russian officials focused on returning to a normal diplomatic relationship.
While Trump and Rubio have placed blame on Moscow for the lack of progress towards a peace deal, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has publicly declared that Kiev would not surrender any territory to bring the war to an end.
Additionally, Kiev is moving closer to signing a deal to allow Washington to recapture some of the money spent on Ukraine aid by seizing profits from sales of oil, gas and rare earth minerals. A top Ukrainian official said a memorandum of intent was signed on Thursday, and the deal is expected to be inked next week.
It’s unclear if the arrangement includes security guarantees for Ukraine, but Rubio told reporters the issue came up during his talks in Paris.
Kyle Anzalone is the opinion editor of Antiwar.com and news editor of the Libertarian Institute. He hosts The Kyle Anzalone Show and is co-host of Conflicts of Interest with Connor Freeman.
April 15, 2025 Young Ukrainian Pilots Keep Dying Pointlessly in Defunct NATO Jets Nearly Twice Their Age. “NATO puppets are sending them to a Certain Death”
Aerial warfare is among the most complex military operations, particularly against a vastly superior opponent. Firstly, finding the right people to become pilots is an extremely difficult task, even in peacetime. Various sources report that only 0.3% of USAF applicants get to become fighter pilots.
https://infobrics.org/post/43928
More sanctions! By now, the more the merrier. Therebis nothing that Russia cannot source elsewhere rhrough trade with Asia. And its own industry and services thst benefitted from sactions by expanding domestic market – are not likely to allows too quick reintegration with Western economies; since European states are recalibrating their economies by converting civikian productikn to military — like Voljswagen — no rush there either. Or are leaving for other countries with access to afordable energy , like Mercedes going to Hungary.
Those rare earths in Ukraine may end up a pipe dream. The incredible dirty snd dangerous to health processing of these minerals will be a big hindrance dpwn the road. Ukrainian soil is one of the most fertile on earth, and its unddrground water too vulnerable to polution, that any government after Zelenski will be facing a huge backlash. Look at what is happening to Serbia where Rio Tinto got a contrract for extracting rare earths -/ and Europe is outting pressure on tge government to go abead ad massive protests are rocking the country. Europe expects most of their needs to be met from Rio Tinto operation. Europe even corrupted judges that reversed Government attempt to getmout of it. The operation is threatening a fertile valleys key to agriculture as well as many aquifiers.
I am not sure what Trump believes he achieved. All that will happen is the continuation of miney being pumped into Ukraine to prop up their military salaries, codt of bureacracy and their retirement system. And naturally all the supplues of equipmenf etc will continue.
There is no room for negootiation. What is there to negotiate about? Proxy war continues.
April 15, 2025 Young Ukrainian Pilots Keep Dying Pointlessly in Defunct NATO Jets Nearly Twice Their Age. “NATO puppets are sending them to a Certain Death”
Aerial warfare is among the most complex military operations, particularly against a vastly superior opponent. Firstly, finding the right people to become pilots is an extremely difficult task, even in peacetime. Various sources report that only 0.3% of USAF applicants get to become fighter pilots.
https://infobrics.org/post/43928
That’s an old problem, though. The age of manned fixed-wing combat aircraft is over. Anyone who dies in one now does so by way of using up obsolete inventory.
Drones replace completely?
Yep. Drones are cheaper and a new pilot doesn’t have to be recruited and trained every time one gets shot down.
Can be run from Arizona.
Coordinates given. That's it.
There is a mental dimension though, with men seeing the deaths caused by their work.
Just like on the ground. Can never erase that from the mind. Ever.
2000 lb bombs on drones over Gaza?
Probably not yet. The largest bombs I’ve noticed drones capable of carrying so far are in the 500-pound range.
But drones are generally cheaper than manned fixed-wing aircraft even before considering the costs — including time — of recruiting, training, and equipping human pilots who tend to die when their aircraft get shot down. A drone pilot can just launch another drone and get right back to work. There are also likely maintenance and facilities cost savings with drones.
Manned fixed-wing aircraft are going the way of the muzzle-loading musket and the cavalry horse, and for the same reason: A cheaper and more effective alternative is emerging.
There’s also a factor involved that applies to tanks — the countermeasures for both aircraft and armor are getting cheaper and cheaper while also getting far more effective.
When I was in the Marine Corps, the current anti-tank weapon was the Dragon. It took a team of two, was slow, firer-guided after firing, and not especially effective, and created a giant cloud of red smoke when fired, revealing its team’s position to the enemy. The Javelin can be fired by one person (although it’s usually deployed in two-man teams of a gunner and an ammunition bearer), it’s “fire and forget” instead of the gunner having to sit there and guide the missile in, it creates less of an enemy-trackable signature when fired, and is much more effective. Belligerents are going to have to figure out some way to replace large, slow, heavy armored vehicles because they’re a malinvestment now.
Thanks for your expertise.
To be honest, I haven’t invested enough time in understanding weaponry.
It’s difficult enough for me to attempt a grasp of all the different economic theories and opinions while paying attention to the ongoing fuckery.
You’re welcome, but I don’t claim any great expertise. It’s just sort of a math problem. If an old thing gets more expensive and less effective then a new thing comes along that’s cheaper and more effective, the new thing replaces the old thing. Not just in weaponry. You may have noticed that most people don’t get around by horse, buggy, and steamboat these days.
Well. Yeah. But the expense part is debatable.
Even the largest high-end drones seem to be about as expensive as the older generations of manned combat aircraft still in service — minus the cost of recruiting, training, and paying pilots and air crew. On the maintenance side, there’s less crew support/safety stuff to be constantly repairing, recharging, or upgrading.
On the lower end, the small “swarm” type drones for defeating e.g. anti-air systems, and the small “suicide” drones that carry their payload right into the target instead of dropping or launching something then returning to base, appear to be VERY cheap.
Cheap, of course, not being the opposite of “profitable.” The cost savings on the “manned” kind will presumably go into larger quantiies of the unmanned kind. Which suits the military industrial complex just fine. They’ve always considered live troops to be an overhead cost, except when they branch into fat contracts for e.g. mess halls and such.
Old things require maintenance and replacement of parts. Expensive.
Tom, you are forgetting one important thing. Drones can not think. If their communication link is disabled the best they can do is follow a pre program mission or fly home. That is their Achilles heel.
What's so important about that thing?
Or, more to the point, how is it any different for a pilot in a manned aircraft with a damaged communications system? That pilot either completes the pre-programmed mission or tries to fly home.
Berms in strategic spots can be traps for tanks, to expose the belly of the beast.
You are right about the signature smoke of the Dragon. Fire and run.
That isn't "combat". That's killing fish in a barrel.
Yes. My point, though, was that I doubted drones could handle that weight.
I know. My comment was of the smart-ass variety. No need to worry about anything when the people under those 2,000 lb bombs can't shoot your ass down.
This is the business model. Iraq and Afghanistan were great examples of moving 'old stock' so the MIC can replace with new.
The only problem most of us have with this is that people have to die for it to work.
Or by flying where they are not suppose to fly…
Ukrainian pilots are Darwin Award winners. Anyone stupid enough to joust with Russia's advanced SAMs or Air to air missiles is not that bright!
Schadenfreude!
And yet Ukraine air force is still flying missions and killing Russians. Go figure.
No, the Ukrainian air farce is not doing much more than duck and cover!
Only due to our providing the weapons for the air force to use.
Not really….
Apr 14, 2025 Lavrov: Multipolarity is Undeniable and Inevitable – Antalya Diplomacy Forum, April 12, 2025
https://youtu.be/8IElc_ucpu0?si=mgrMSGBYvxnxdY_X
It would be nice if we, the U.S. of A., had statesmen the caliber of Mr. Lavrov.
Thanks for your time and comments Vlp1730. I do my best to provide information from allot of sources. I believe we can never ever know enough myself.
Lets make a deal bob,er boob.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/87188155061a0e2ef9a459f9282f560283955004ea945f232010d6958e569262.png
The answer, my friends, is blowing in the wind,,, https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a7725ce703c110a61123977618f8c81ecc2fba19ba6638ff4d1133114682bc81.jpg
At least this photo (if not AIed) shows the contour of Trump's bald head…! He would immediately make it orange (using tanning machine or sun) to match his face…!
Peace is always possible when all those involved participate in a constructive way!….
How to end the war in Ukraine quickly? Cut off all military aid, cash, and intelligence!
Sure and sit back and watch Putin forces sweep into the country. That is one way to end the war, turn over Ukraine to Russia.
Fantastic, that would be great. Of course, Russia does not want any of the fascists in Western Ukraine so Russia will only take land that is Russian and was part of the Russian Empire.
One of the objectives of the SMO was to secure the welfare for the Russian speaking Ukraine citizens in the Eastern Oblasts.
Had Nuland, Obama, Biden not kick started the Maidan affair, Ukraine would not be in this situation.
Going back a little further, had Clinton not signal the start of the gathering of nations to join NATO and point weapons at Russia, the world would not be in this mess.
You are correct to state that Russia does not want anything to do with Western Ukraine.
They especially don't want the Polish-speaking portion, with it's fanatical hatred of everything Russian.
If Ukrainians are so free, why do they need be forced to fight for their own country?
Not enough: Europe is not cutting the aid at all. Some bits like Musk's Starlink and such can't be replaced but most of the rest is replaceable, especially as the war now depends on already built endless fortified lines and very especially cheap FPV drones (made in China?)
As for ammunition the USA was never the main provider at all.
Fine let Europe pay for 100% of Ukraine’s graft and corruption. Europe cannot afford guns and butter!
They’ve already decided to cut the butter. My butter…
Actually they can: the ReArm Europe program is based on expanding the debt ceiling only for that purpose. Europe embraced austerity long ago, so it has some margin to get indebted. And those guns and bombs will help get the respect of other actors (Germany definitely needs to rearm if it wants to lead Europe, France doesn’t). Remember when that Israeli threatened to nuke Europe a decade ago or so? Well, no more if the plan goes ahead.
In the mid run it may cause a revolution but that’s not a bad thing in my opinion: we need new truly continentalist and socialist leadership, not these neoliberal rats, much less the fascist Trump bootlicker traitors waging the flag without any real nationalism behind it.
Ukraine is not the core issue. Remember that most of Europe was dragged by the USA (and Britain and conservative Poland, which has shifted its stand quite radically) to back them. Remember that “someone” (the USA) destroyed the North Stream pipeline in terrorist attack. Remember that France was rather friendly to Russia until the Sahel coups backed by Russia got Macron so anxious and angry. Ukraine is just a rally point for the US-Europe conflict on Greenland, tariffs and in general respect.
Without U.S., Europe is nothing.
Why? Europe has been something on its own for centuries and even millennia. Why does your country matter so much when it’s been clearly declining for lack of social investment for a very long time already and is now ruled by some sort of crazy monkey who has no idea of what he’s doing?
“ lack of social investment” Please keep the European social investment in Europe and out of U.S. The European model is an excellent example not to emulate.
You call yourself "Analyzer"? Please analyze why the USA has become so un-competitive, please. The main reason is salaries, which are determined at the baseline by the cost of survival, the cost of life. People can't work for less than that (not for long anyhow), am I right? Of course I am.
What determines the cost of life? Many things but one of the most fundamental ones in our time and for many decades already is the cost of housing (education and healthcare are also important). Housing has been bubbling wildly since at least the 90s (not just in the USA, Britain and Spain are also very affected), this could and should have been corrected in 2008 but was not, all the opposite: the bubble was patched so the "investors" (speculators) did not lose their parasitic wealth.
That's why the USA can't compete while other countries with better protected worker basic needs can (be them China, which has recently cracked on their housing bubble, or even Germany before the gas crisis of 2022). Subsizing workers' essentials is indirectly subsidizing companies and the overall economy: it's win-win.
And that's why the USA is losing and won't stand back on its feet until a true socialist revolution happens (not yet but eventually, I hope).
A socialist is a person who has never produced anything on their own in their life let alone hire or fire someone. But lash out at the wealthy and use government force to steal production goods under the mantel of “social investment”. The mistake the wealthy made was turn U.S. into a consumer based economy. But in time, after WW3, and those who survive will once again reclaim the value of production. Europeans will also soon realize the value of self-sustaining instead of relying on U.S. to purchase their goods. My advice to you: It is unwise to throw rocks when you’re standing in a house made out of glass.
You analyzed nothing. I did.
You only dogmatized and worshiped Moloch (the rich).
Change your pseudonym for something more adequate, pls.
I analyzed you perfectly. Free loaders have existed since the days of the past. They justify class warfare and give power to the government to get their way. And when the wealthy gain control over the same government, they cry when their freedoms are taken away..
LOL, you’re a total ultra-capitalist dogmatic, one of those who works for the government they criticize.
I’m for social power, not just “the state”: state can be evil, especially in undemocratic hands.
I don't understand what all this means. Is it the implication that the USA will simply walk away, as in no more aid, intelligence support, money, weapons, ammo, etc, for the Ukraine, if there is no progress in the peace talks? OR, that the USA is going to continue to provide all of those things to the Ukraine, and just stop trying to conduct peace talks with Russia and the Ukraine, if there is no progress? What is the actual "or else" here, in the "make a deal or else" threat that is being made? The status quo ante (ie the US continues to support the Ukraine), or the USA gets clear of the matter, tout court (ie the US drops all support for the Ukraine)? Or something else either in between or entirely?
It sounds to me like excuses are being created to cover the minerals deal. That is, the “or else” is the minerals deal will mean we (the US) will have to protect Ukraine because of this minerals deal unless you (Russia) get to a ceasefire right away! And if you do a ceasefire we'll take the minerals anyway because they're due to us (the official position, not my position). So it's another non-starter because Russia is NOT dragging its heels, it is setting basic conditions for a ceasefire to proceed.
Apparently, this is the Rubio faction's position Witkoff will have to deal with in his next meeting with Putin. Then Trump will do what? Toss a coin on what to do, with a “Let's see here . . .” sigh as to whether to continue with negotiations or walk away. This is the state of the US “ability” to deal with the situation at this time.
I’m sorry, but that still leaves me rather confused. If there is no deal, what does “walking away” mean, to the Trump Administration and to Trump himself? Will the US stop funding the Ukraine (ie “walk away” from the entire situation) or keep the funding coming (ie merely “walk away” from the negotiations but otherwise maintain the status quo)?
I think the Trump admin may be finally waking up to the impossibility of arranging a deal in which he emerges as looking good—because the only deal possible (realistically) is to surrender to Russia's terms. The Rubio wing is against this most vigorously and, additionally problematical, it would likely be cast as “defeat” for Trump, adding to his disapproval points.
So my view is that this “walking away” means he's offering a threat to give up and leave the situation as is—or even imply the possibility of aiding Ukraine because the minerals deal could demand a certain amount of military action in protection of Ukraine for the deal to be realized. So my view is very cynical. I don't see Trump as having any capacity to deal with the war, and I feel he's not had any capacity to do so from way back. It was, and is, all bluster.
I think you’re correct — since the only deal possible (realistically”) is to surrender to Russia’s terms, and since there are no circumstances under which those terms are likely to be achieved, there will be no deal and the war will drag on until Putin figures out a way to “declare victory” and save face with a unilateral ceasefire.
…Or, Zelensky is forced internally to make a deal…!
Unclear to me in all this is the view of the Ukranian people. Are they mostly with Zelensky or against him? Getting a mandate on what Ukranians think seems to be first priority toward getting the war over with (that is, if they've had it with Zelensky).
Millions of Ukrainians fled Ukraine when the war started. Millions of these Ukrainians are not expected to return to Ukraine when the war ends. I believe General Sirsky recently stated that 6 million Ukrainian men are avoiding conscription. Ukrainian men have died trying to escape Ukraine to avoid call-up to the military. The Ukrainian authorities are grabbing men off the streets to feed their military.
Does this suggest any conclusion?
It suggests that since Zelensky has not been re-elected, thus is not acting from a mandate of the people and their constitution, this entire cease-fire project by Trump is phony and was never serious in the first place.
Exactly…!
Over 60% of the population wants peace NOW, so I'd say "against".
Nonsense, Russia does not need to "figure" anything it is happening as we speak.
Russia remembers WWII and perceives, quite correctly that the NATO/EU/US/UK agenda is an existential threat. The problem is Putin is using the US Vietnam policy of keeping the war going hoping the other side will capitulate without causing too much destruction. How did that work in Vietnam? It didn't. People fight harder when their land is threatened, just like Russia did in WWII. So it is with the Ukraine resistance. It could be called war by quagmire.
Courtesy Pepe Escobar
https://t.me/rocknrollgeopolitics/15024
Personally, I think it depends on how insulted Rump feels about Putin's refusal to kowtow like a good lackey. It's all about "feelings" with these people, no planning or strategy to speak of.
I think the notion that Trump is Putin’s lackey is way overblown. But the notion that Putin is Trump’s lackey is just completely ridiculous! Putin served in the KGB, and ran the FSB. He has been in charge of Russia (as PM or President) for 25 years. I agree that Trump has no strategy and does little or no planning. But I doubt even Trump is stupid or deranged enough to think that Putin is his lackey, or will behave like one. But, if you are right, and Trump’s ego has been wounded by Putin, then “truce or else we will walk away” means only that “we” (the USA, the Trump Adminstration) will walk away from ceasefire talks, and that the aid to the Ukraine will continue.
That’s my fear, as well.
Apr 19, 2025 Putin Orders Easter Ceasefire as Russia and Ukraine Exchange Hundreds of POWs
PresidentVladimir Putin ordered a temporary Easter ceasefire in Ukraine, the Kremlin announced Saturday, as both Moscow and Kyiv said they exchanged hundreds of prisoners of war with mediation from the United Arab Emirates.
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/04/19/putin-orders-easter-ceasefire-as-russia-and-ukraine-exchange-hundreds-of-pows-a88798
https://static.themoscowtimes.com/image/article_1360/8b/TASS_79950154.jpg
The answer is that it won't probably end in around two years unless Putin gets a super-offensive out his magic hat or there is a revolution in Ukraine, neither expected to happen. The Russia advance is… but it is extremely slow, the road to Kiev is very long and full of fortified lines, the weapons that matter the most are FPV drones, which are dirty cheap and any gamer teenager can manage quite well with almost no training, and of course there is that pesky EUrope implying that unless we get a 35% discount on all tariffs and a seat at the negotiating table, Ukraine will keep getting all they need to stalemate Russia, always to the last Ukrainian (now including women and teens).
Ursula has even proclaimed that "the West as we knew it is no more", essentially showing Trump the exit doof of NATO (it will still linger but it's not anymore operative as it was just months ago). She also said that most of global trade is not with the USA and that EUrope wants a piece of it ("hi Xi, Modi, Lula, and all the rest, we don't feel anymore bound by US sanctions, policies or whatever, long live multipolarity", not a literal quote of course).
So the Ukraine war may well be Suez Canal 2.0 for EUrope but there are some differences: neither the USA nor Russia are anymore as powerful as to dictate the terms. Multipolarity has multiple poles and many of those are in Europe.
Apr 19, 2025 Putin Orders Easter Ceasefire as Russia and Ukraine Exchange Hundreds of POWs
President Vladimir Putin ordered a temporary Easter ceasefire in Ukraine, the Kremlin announced Saturday, as both Moscow and Kyiv said they exchanged hundreds of prisoners of war with mediation from the United Arab Emirates.
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/04/19/putin-orders-easter-ceasefire-as-russia-and-ukraine-exchange-hundreds-of-pows-a88798
https://static.themoscowtimes.com/image/article_1360/8b/TASS_79950154.jpg
I'm wondering if Kiev is cooperating, or if they're going to use the opportunity to attack. Considering the competence of their leadership, probably the latter.
Thanks for your time and comments Bixby. Knowing Kyiv is Nazi, and my understanding of history. I would never believe the word of a Nazi ever!
I’m not sure they’re organized enough to be Nazi, they mostly seem like thugs competing to grab the most graft possible. It’s too bad so many innocents are dying for them.
I appreciate your engagement and curiosity as well. Here is an article away from the mainstream global media for better insights Bixby.
February 24, 2025 Ukraine’s Neo-Nazi Government Is Supported by the International Community
Adolph Hitler is “The Torchbearer of Democracy” in Ukraine Introduction and Update: Amply documented the Kiev regime is dominated by Neo-Nazis. In the peace negotiations initiated in Saudi Arabia on February 18, members of the Kiev regime including President Zelensky were not invited.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/hitler-is-the-torchbearer-of-democracy-according-to-chairman-of-ukraines-parliament/5653184
https://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/bandera-rally-nazi-ukraine-2015.jpg
Zelensky has said "No" they will not cooperate. Adn then blamed the Russians attacking them.
Putin declares ceasefire with Ukraine.
Kiev is moving closer to signing a deal to allow Washington to recapture some of the money spent on Ukraine aid by seizing profits from sales of oil, gas and rare earth minerals.
They may as well sign, most of the resources they're pretending to be selling are in Russian-occupied territory. Foggy Bottom will probably then proceed to tell Russia that they have to hand them over. Stupidity as usual.
SIMPLICIUS Ѱ
@simpatico771
·
1h
⚡️🇺🇸🇺🇦Despite public rhetoric and media speculation, the change in the American administration has not yet had a significant impact on the volume of military supplies to Ukraine.
These volumes can be roughly estimated and compared by the number of heavy transport aircraft flights in the interests of the Pentagon to Rzeszow, Poland.
If we take into account military transport C-17 and C-5, as well as chartered civilian cargo Boeing 747 and Douglas MD-11F, we get the picture shown in the graph above.
Abnormal surges in deliveries are clearly visible in preparation for the Ukrainian Armed Forces' offensive in 2023 and late 2024 due to the Biden administration's concerns about the cessation of deliveries after Trump takes office.
If we exclude these anomalies, then on average 35 such flights arrived in Rzeszow per month in 2023-2024.
And in February-April 2025, despite a week-long pause in March, there will be an average of 25 flights per month.
Over the 19 days of April, 20 flights have already arrived.
©kargin_version
-neinsider
https://tass.com/world/1946241
"NEW YORK, April 19. /TASS/. Ukraine will not become part of NATO; the issue of Kiev's accession to the alliance is not under discussion, according to Keith Kellogg, the US presidential special envoy for Ukraine and Russia.
"We've been very clear: NATO is off the table. You're not going to be part of it. That's something that's not new. We've been talking about that since 2008 when Ambassador Burns told Condoleezza Rice, this was a bridge too far," Kellogg stated on Fox News.
Earlier, US President Donald Trump said that, despite Vladimir Zelensky’s desire for Ukraine to join NATO, it will never happen. He also suggested that the Ukrainian conflict may have been triggered by Kiev’s ambitions to join the alliance.
As Bloomberg reported earlier, Washington presented its allies in Paris with proposals for a Ukrainian settlement. These include a refusal to discuss Kiev's NATO membership and the easing of sanctions against Russia. Additionally, the US draft stipulates that all territories liberated by Russia shall remain under Russian control. Discussions on these proposals are set to continue in London next week."
Right.
In between his fabulous golf victories? How does the donfather find the time to do his er,uhm, job?
How much more arrogant can you get? The US decides everything in the world? It's about time for this bubble to bust.
This bubble won't burst at once…rather lose air gradually due to its imperfection…!
It will, it's called WWIII.
Who does Trump White House think they are???
Same as the previous administration: the dictators of the world.
Hey Rubio! The US isn't threatened in any way by Russia or this war. If they want to fight it out, let them; just don't squander more of our wages you psychopaths in Wash. steal to keep the war going while more and more lives on both sides are lost.