While the sudden regime change in Syria affected numerous regional powers, few face as much disruption as Russia. During the Assad era, Russia maintained very important Mediterranean bases in Syria, including Tartus, Russia’s only Mediterranean naval base. With Assad gone, what’s going to happen to Russia’s assets?
Reports are conflicting. Today, a new report quotes unnamed sources as saying that, in the wake of the takeover by the Islamist Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), Russia intends to withdraw all of its forces, including those in Tartus and the major airbase in Hmeimin within the next month.
Russia hasn’t publicly announced that this is the case, but it has begun removing troops and equipment from some of its over 100 military sites in the county. Troops have been withdrawn from positions in Quneitra, as well as elsewhere in the country. About 10% of Russia’s presence in Syria has reportedly been removed in the last two days.
Over the weekend, conflicting reports suggested that Russia was “pulling back but not pulling out” from Syria. There were further reports last week Russia is in talks with the HTS about keeping at least the Hmeimin Air Base and the Tartus naval base.
Deputy FM Mikhail Bogdanov appeared to confirm those reports of ongoing talks. Russian officials have also been quoted as saying there is “no decision yet” on the future of their bases in Syria.
Whether or not Russia intends to fully withdraw from Syria in the next 30 days, it is scaling back considerably. Returning to full use of its bases will greatly depend on working out a deal with the HTS.
That may be easier said than done. The HTS used Ukrainian arms during the offensive that led to its power grab, and the group has been courting Western approval despite its historical and ideological ties to al-Qaeda. HTS’s internationally backed installation in Syria likely came with the presumption that Russia would not be allowed to remain.
In the meantime, reports are that Russian troops still in Syria are short on supplies. As these claims come from Ukrainian intelligence, however, it’s not clear they’re accurate. Maintaining a presence is likely to remain a challenge for Russia given the complex and unstable situation in Syria. Despite clear strategic reasons for Russia to retain its military bases, doing so in a country dominated by HTS might be more of a struggle than it’s worth for the Russians.
Very confusing.
Russia is likely better off being able to now focus only on its own interests.
Russia has some interests in Syria too.
No doubt, it is a geopolitical failure, but not so much Russian failure as a failure of Russian ally. As one Russian monarch said: Russia has only two allies – Russian army and Russian navy, all the rest are unreliable.
On the other hand, if new Syrian regime will be worse than the old one, Arabs can make their conclusion who is better for them, Russia-Iran alliance or NATO-Israel-Al-Qaeda.
Sorry for your loss.
Putin is a loser.
The main original purpose of Russia presence in Syria was to defeat terrorism and prevent terrorist activities in Russian soil…! That threat still exists…!
Lol, how delusional.
Let's hope Assad wasn't too confused and didn't forgot his koffers with gold in Damascus.
Not really. Russia is just throwing dust in the air as a distraction. Either they will leave or they wont.
It is not a choice for Russia.
The Syrians hate them for all the cities Russia destroyed and civilians they killed.
Either they leave soonest or risk getting attacked.
They are not keeping any bases in Syria. Whoever is spreading that possibility is completely out of touch with reality.
I didn’t read that fiction. It had low ratings.
It is damned peculiar. Almost lends credibility to another Commenter's suggestion that Assad, the RF, and the IRI are baiting a trap of territorial Syria with their withdrawal.
The quick and ubiquitous "collapse" of the Syrian Army ? The Russian Federation seemingly ambivalent about keeping a warm-water, Mediterranean naval base ? The USA and ASI marching lockstep into embracing a "wanted" Al Qaeda scion as Syria's new leader ?
The first step in avoiding a trap is knowing the trap exists. I don't think Biden or Netanyahu know it exists.
Or….there is cooperation? Wheeling and dealing.
At last Ukrainian-NATO army is victorious somewhere.
And you know that very well.
Russia started this mess and now Ukraine is not letting Russia take a breather. FAFO!
Maybe Russia can join in on the bombing. It does seem to be a popular trend since Assad left.
Russia has been bombing Syrian civilians for over 10 years, do you want more? Im sure you do.
Sorry for your loss.
You don't know what you are talking about. As usual. And I didn't support Assad any more than I support Putin. But I find it odd that people are cheerleading his demise while Syria is being bombed indiscriminately by Israel. That must be "good" for the Syrian civilians in your view.