On Thursday, the Kremlin confirmed that the changes to Russia’s nuclear doctrine that were outlined by President Vladimir Putin a day earlier were meant as a message to the West as NATO is considering supporting long-range Ukrainian strikes inside Russia.
“This should be viewed as a certain message,” said Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov. “This is a message that warns these countries of the consequences should they participate in an attack on our country by various means, not necessarily nuclear.”
Putin said the new doctrine will consider an attack on Russia by a non-nuclear state that’s supported by a nuclear-armed power as a joint attack, and it allows the use of nuclear weapons in response to a conventional attack that poses a “critical threat to Russian sovereignty.”
The doctrine will also allow the use of nuclear weapons in response to “aggression” against Russia and Belarus and if Russia becomes aware of plans to launch massive airstrikes against its territory.
Russia’s current nuclear doctrine only allows the use of nuclear weapons if Russia faces a nuclear attack or a conventional attack that threatens the existence of the Russian Federation.
Russian Senator Viktor Bondarev told TASS that the changes to the nuclear doctrine were a response “to the constant growth of tension in the rhetoric and direct actions in support of Ukraine on the part of the Western countries.”
He pointed to the US and the UK discussing the idea of supporting long-range strikes inside Russia, which Putin has said would mean NATO is at war with Russia. Bondarev said he hoped “the US, Britain and their puppets in the NATO bloc will have enough common sense not to bring the situation to the point of no return, deadly for the entire planet.”
Bondarev added, “If necessary, I am sure that nothing will stop us from a retaliatory strike that would mean the end of all life on the globe.”
This is an answer to the US pre-emptive nuke strike policy…!
Really – are you claiming that the old policy did not call for the use of nukes in the case of a US pre-emptive nuke strike?
Or is it that you claim this is a declaration that the Russians will do pre-emptive nuclear strikes?
No
&
No…!
So really you did not mean anything by what you wrote?
I meant what I said which is none of your presumptions…!
So just how is this an answer to: US pre-emptive nuke strike policy???
Everyone play nicely in our little sandbox and you all will get a nice cookie…
;-/
Asking politely for a clarification is not playing nice???
When the answer is just no to any rational interpretation of what could have been made – prodding for a clarification is hardly worse is it?
The question thus arises as to which of the parties involved possesses the more rapid missiles. Ukraine has not possessed any nuclear weapons since 1994, having transferred them to Russia. However, it is evident that Russia is currently misusing its nuclear potential in the ongoing conflict and war of aggression.
https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/ukraine-nuclear-weapons-and-security-assurances-glance
https://war.ukraine.ua/faq/does-ukraine-have-nuclear-weapons/
Ukraine never possessed nuclear weapons.
Germany also has American nukes on German land. It doesn't mean Germany can use them.
American will use them. Americans have the code for the launch, the targeting and satellite codes. Germany would be lit up by the Russian response. I thought Germans were smart…………..
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/79b952b3042c86dafb4224d2b9538fe1fe7947328e87f916f0b705821580dec3.jpg
Putin is trying to prevent an escalation. Hardly he can succeed. One can't dance tango alone. It is okay for U.S. if minor nuclear war happens in Europe. If Russia uses it first, it'll be even better for U.S.
On the other hand, it gives Putin a good tool.
I strongly disagree with your interpretation of Russian nuclear strategy. In fact, the opposite is true – it represents a significant escalation of military aggression and a refusal to engage in ceasefire negotiations or peace talks.
https://sputnikglobe.com/20231027/russia-conducts-training-launches-of-iskander-m-missile-systems-1114519698.html
Don’t fuck around and find out.
Precisely. We have guys and gals in D.C. and in the Pentagon who are very cavalier about things that could get out of hand and kill us all.
Short, sweet and to the point:
Peace on Earth, goodwill toward Human Kind.
https://youtu.be/X19G6tPfzlc?si=jONJqPk7jYyXPJN6
Thanks for linking that. Sometimes it’s useful to have a reminder that Russia’s talking heads are just as morally repugnant, just as mentally retarded, and just as prone to drug-addled, fantasist pronouncements, as their American counterparts.
Mentally retarded? Drug-addled? Can you substantiate that?
You can substantiate it yourself by turning on any "roundtable" or "guest panel" news show.
You can’t. Just as I thought.
You thought? Really? Can you substantiate that?
You like to pick nits. It appears you just can’t take it when someone else plays your nit picking game against you.
I expressed a broad generalized opinion, not a specific claim.
My source for that broad generalized opinion is an aggregation of other, more specific, opinions.
If I make a FACTUAL CLAIM — for example, that at about 11:45 pm, on September 30, 2024, a large disc-shaped object was seen by millions hovering over downtown Los Angeles — that will be the kind of claim that one substantiates with specific evidence.
While “Jennifer Lawrence is ugly and not a very good actor” would be a stupid opinion, it would still be an opinion.
I’m not sure why you think I “can’t take” you bloviating “against” me. I didn’t run away. I didn’t block you. I just noticed that you’re being kind of stupid.
Thomas, you have inhaled too much gun smoke during you years in the Corps.
I love the smell of cordite in the morning.
Soloviov is right. The escalation is progressing exactly because Putin is too cautious.
On the other hand, for Putin, the economic situation is priority. If he acts more strong militarily, India and Brazil will move closer to U.S.
It is a complicated game.
If Israel expands the war to Iran, what will the Russian reaction be?
https://www.rt.com/russia/604899-lavrov-nuclear-state-war-suicide/
Whether it's a simplistic analysis or not, the world doesn't move closer to anything resembling extended peace until Washington, London, Paris, and perhaps Berlin are leveled, hyperinflation vanishes, and a debt default is finalized.