Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev warned in an op-ed published on Sunday that the Western policy of pouring weapons into Ukraine could lead to “apocalypse.”
“One could continue to pump weapons into the neo-fascist Kiev regime and block any opportunity to revive negotiations,” Medvedev wrote in the Russian newspaper Izvestiya.
“Our enemies are doing just that, not wanting to understand that their goals obviously lead to a total fiasco. Lose for everyone. Collapse. Apocalypse. When the former life will have to be forgotten for centuries, until the smoky blockages cease to emit radiation,” he added.
Last October, President Biden made a similar assessment, warning that the chances of “nuclear armageddon” were higher than at any time since the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis. Despite his acknowledgment, Biden has only escalated US involvement in the war in Ukraine and hasn’t taken steps to reduce tensions with Moscow.
Medvedev, who currently serves as the deputy of the Russian Security Council, has been warning throughout the war that it could spiral into a nuclear conflict between NATO and Russia. Last week, he said that Russia is willing to defend itself with nuclear weapons in comments that came after Russian President Vladimir Putin suspended Moscow’s participation in New START.
New START is the last remaining nuclear arms control treaty between the US and Russia and limits the deployment of warheads and launchers. Russian officials have stressed Putin’s move is temporary and that the treaty could be restored if the US makes an effort to de-escalate tensions over Ukraine. Putin has also said that the treaty should take into account Britain and France’s nuclear arsenals.
If Charlton Heston was alive until 2030, he could reenact his famous Planet of the Ape scene in front of a buried Statue of Liberty.
“Damn you all to hell”. Or the final scenes to On the Beach.
Unbelievable but you should have heard him utter the words without a lot of conviction which really means that he was reading from a script.
War is peace — Freedom is slavery — Ignorance is strength …Orwell
—-
These times we’re living in.
It’s become a crime to reveal the truth – nothing positive comes from visiting a voting booth.
Not a war criminal in sight – just plain forgot who ordered those rendition flights.
National state of fright – Global loss of civil rights.
Lipstick on a pig – Profits for the MIC.
True delight for the investment class, foie gras pate coming out of it’s arse.
Profits for the MIC is a great motivation but only for MIC and not for the taxpayers. NATO leadership is already struggling to convince the taxpayers that those money are well invested.
Certainly not for the general public – all funding for the MIC is created as debt which is how the US lost control over its sovereignty.
Who extends that credit and who owns the MIC?
Blackrock Vanguard – City of London?
The debt is owned by the oligarchy. The oligarchy owns the national debt, the mass media and the political class. That’s how the oligarchy system works.
Would you agree that what’s required to beat this ”system” is a new and improved economic system?
One can improve nothing, so far as the legislative body is controlled by the banksters and by the big business.
For bringing a new political force into the legislative body, it is absolutely necessary to have an access to main mass media. While the main TV channels are controlled by the oligarchy, it is unachievable.
The ‘Federal Reserve'(consortium of bankers) and other Central Banks have one product and that is debt, the more debt they issue, the stronger they become. Imagine being able to issue money out of thin air and then collect interest on this imaginary currency.
The big banks under the umbrella of the Fed do not have any worry of failure. There are bail-outs available, and, the new thing on the block, bail-ins. You see, deposits are considered owned by the banks are entrusted to preserve them, so, in time of stress, the banks can use the deposits for self preservation, as well as make risky bets which led to the stress.
Which requires another loan to repay the first one – this system of usury is both sadistic and vicious.
Ever noticed that governments are suspiciously reluctant to tax the financial elite – instead they borrow from them and even promise to repay the loan with interest – a concept which is highly contradictory.
If anyone did this with their mortgage the ”creditor” would have taken ownership [lets mention that Blackrock now controls the Fed plus the Treasury.]
Confucius said: “When the words lose their meaning, the people lose their freedom” (名不正，… 則民無所措手足。)
The Kremlin believes their invasion of Ukraine was the way to peace.
And, Wash. believes a proxy war for corp. profits is the way to peace.
You’d be wise to get some better sources.
It may be a wild theory of mine. But I wonder if the Citizens United decision was the beginning of a revolution that would place Corporations firmly in control of US politics.
The meddling in Ukraine predates that decision. But there is no doubt in my mind that the tensions that both Trump and Biden have been preparing against China are being driven by commercial interests.
Nothing “wild” at all about that theory, Duane. That’s exactly what Citizens United was intended to do, because after all, “ Corporations are people too!”
Forgot who said that but I clearly recall it being quoted.
Yes, and I’ll believe it when one of them is executed in Texas, or at least put into long-term solitary confinement.
Mitt the twit.
Gypsy is right
It all goes back to the Lewis Powell memo but as always there’s far more to this*
Our modern era of legalized political bribery began in the decade after Richard Nixon put Lewis Powell — the tobacco lawyer who wrote the infamous 1971 “Powell Memo” outlining how billionaires and corporations could take over America — on the Supreme Court in 1972.
In the 1976 Buckley v. Valeo decision, the Court ruled that political money wasn’t just cash: they claimed it’s also “free speech” protected by the First Amendment that guarantees your right to speak out on political issues.
Due to citizens united, corporations are allowed to make unlimited contributions to political campaigns in the US and they do big time, money buy’s exposure on the MSM while third parties have the element of logic going for them they simply do not enjoy the luxury of exposure on the MSM, instead they are denied being part of the audience in the big nationalized debates.
The Lewis Powell memo ? [GreenPeace]
* The other part of it all is that due to the US taking on more and more debt which can never be repaid the US lost it’s sovereignty to their creditors.
If interested I’ll post some on that but usually it triggers thought control filters.
Southern, the only way to have free and reasonable elections is to have the government disperse a finite amount of money to each candidate: no more, no less. No more private contributions from the likes of the MIC and AIPAC, for example.
Yeah, I know, only in my mind…
All good I would add that for fair and honest elections in the US it’s absolutely crucial to do away with the Electoral Collage system and replace this with a system where the voters are able to cast their ballot for their preferred candidate directly.
What should be done about a electoral system where 270 people of the electoral college get to decide the outcome of [P]residential elections yet whom are not bound by the popular vote! [Here’s a short explanatory video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUS9mM8Xbbw ]
The US needs an entirely new electoral system where the electorate will be able to cast their vote for the candidate of choice directly as opposed to the present system where ”delegates” are not bound by the popular vote but are however able to cater to their own agenda.
Corporate interests should be denied influencing politics just like religion.
US politicians should not be required or allowed for that matter to pledge allegiance to a foreign entity as AIPAC requires them to do – So in effect they’ve pledged allegiance to another ”nation” an apartheid state at that where the Zionist have hijacked a religion in order to pursue their own selfish interests which comes at the expense of the Palestinians.
US politicians pledging allegiance to them and the MIC comes at the expense of the US public and much more.
Replacing it with a system where voting is done voluntarily is one option – meaning no one should be denied the opportunity to vote for having been struck of as a result of misdemeanors – for a nation of over 330 million – voting turnout is abysmally low due to a number of ”undemocratic” reasons.
In the end the US political system is a corporately controlled duopoly where the interests of the financial elite reigns supreme while the interests of everyone else are as neglected as can be just like they intended this to be.
One of those corporate interests is the Military Industrial Complex which has a lot of power and is able to sue for loss of income due to the conditionalities in their contracts – If it was up to me I’d simply tear up the contract since the US doesn’t abide by any law then why should they abide by ISDS provisions in a contract with weapon manufacturers.
Many people have already pointed out that the entire electoral college system needs to be overhauled – something which cannot be designed from within the present power structure as its already proven to be beyond savaging.
When comes a time when people will have had enough?
“Lo que separa la civilización de la anarquía son solo siete comidas.”
(Civilization and anarchy are only seven meals apart.)
—Spanish proverb…”
Wonderfully stated Southern!
👏👏👏
My reply triggered thought control filters.
That’s the 3rd or 4th on this site today.
There is no need for Russia to use nukes any soon. It would be even more strange if US, UK or France suddenly decide to use nukes against Russia. How much money is going NATO to invest in this war also unclear. Maybe about $200 billions a year. Russia can cope with it even without nukes. On the other hand, the war in Ukraine needs also the cannon fodder, not only money. Ukraine is already struggling very hard to replace the casualties. Poland is more or less a reliable source but Poland alone is not enough.
While visiting Poland and trying to convince Poles that US is a reliable partner, Biden repeated several times about article 5 NATO. However it is unclear how far US is ready to go in case Russia starts hitting the targets in Poland. It is highly unlikely that US will use nukes against Russia for the sake of Poland.
During the Cold War, it always was US strategy to counter a conventional Soviet attack in Europe by nuclear weapons. The North-German plains were designated as nuclear theater. All of Germany and most of Europe would have been destroyed by a US decision to use nuclear weapons. Europeans had no say in the decision. Since that time, the US never desisted from its first strike doctrine on the understanding that the US homeland would not be affected. As a European, I’m unable to understand why Europeans would want this. Europeans have been indoctrinated by Anglo-American propaganda to a point beyond redemption.
That’s true, Russian conventional military forces based in East Germany were counterbalanced by American tactical nukes. The same situation, only other way around, can happen again. If NATO mobilizes such a strong conventional military force against Russia that it would be too difficult for Russia to cope with it, Russia may use the tactical nukes against the conventional NATO forces. Of course, it is Europe who will pay for everything, as usual.
There is no scenario in which Nato could assemble a conventional force to defeat Russia in Ukraine or in Russia. Russia could not defeat Nato in Germany or Mexico, for example, but the Russians have the means and the determination to defend the home-land and the Russians in Ukraine. Leaving aside the fact that Westerners are too fat and lazy for wanting to die in the trenches, Nato cannot match Russia’s defensive capabilities. The Russian forces are essentially defensive (missiles and anti-aircraft systems), while US forces are essentially offensive (fighter airplanes, aircraft carriers, etc. for global force projection). Russia has a solid advance in missiles and anti-aircraft systems over the West. Nato has no chance against Russian air defenses and Nato has nothing to defend against Russia’s hypersonic missiles. Moreover, Russia can easily mobilize millions of troops.
No, Nato cannot win a conventional war in Ukraine. That is totally out of the question. The Anglo-American empire is maritime and can only fight land wars by using proxies. The Empire can only win by deceit. That’s what we need to watch out for. What provocation or psychological operation will the Neocons use to trigger WW3?
Even if Russia were to get into a tight spot because of a provocation, China would chip in with its manufacturing power or by replying to a US provocation over Taiwan or the South China seas. Both are powder kegs. The Chinese know that if the US were to defeat Russia, they would be next in line.
It is enough to compare the industrial potential of NATO and the industrial potential of Russia to see that the full scale conventional war would, in the end, cripple Russia. Also you may compare the population of NATO and the population of Russia. That’s why Russia is ready to use the nukes first if necessary. Why Putin or anyone else in Kremlin should sacrifice hundreds of thousands his soldiers if he can stop NATO offensive by a couple of small tactical nukes?
Because it all ends when nuclear weapons are used. We will all die in a nuclear winter even in a limited nuclear war. 27 million Russians died in the last war. They have the will to defend their country, which we don’t have.
GDP comparisons are pointless. PPP comparisons are a little better but still don’t give the full picture. China and Russia still have a real economy, based on actual things they can sell. We have a virtual economy and a lot of debts, which could collapse the global economy at any time. If Western military pays 500 USD for a hammer that costs 5 USD in Russia, it doesn’t mean we have a hammer 100 times more valuable. Our costs are just inflated and much of our economy virtual. If you click FB a thousand times it increases the nominal value of the economy, but it doesn’t produce any real value, you still need resources and products from countries such as Russia and China. They don’t need us, but we need them.
Anyways, 1 year of artillery war in Ukraine has shown that, while the Russians have an unlimited supply of ammunition, the West is running out of ammunitions it can provide to Ukraine. We have to go around to the ME and Latin America to beg for ammunitions, which these countries don’t want to provide because they are with Russia or they want to stay neutral. Russia is winning the industrial warfare too. And if China enters the game, it’s game over for the West.
Agree. Additionally, Russia developed it’s hypersonic weapons to assure that the US will not be completely spared.
I noticed that when Biden told all Americans to leave Russia a couple of weeks ago, Russia put several of its warships to sea. This would make it far more difficult to prevent retaliation in the event of a first strike by the US.
The idea to develop the hypersonic missiles appeared when Americans started the construction of their anti-missile shield in East Europe. In those couple of decades Russia managed to develop a new generation of the missiles which make all the anti-missile systems useless. Other countries are trying to catch up with Russia but they are far behind.
Any Americas that stay behind will be toast. Truman didn’t give a hoot about American POWs.
Right V, see “Slaughterhouse 5”.
If this goes Nuclear, it will only be because Russia fired first. A response to such attack by the US doesn’t necessarily need to be nuclear.
If you are convinced that Russia doesn’t have the need to use Nukes soon then why doesn’t this idiot Medvedev you admire so much stop talking about it?
The US always had a first strike doctrine, as it demonstrated in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The Russian nuclear doctrine only allows for the use of nuclear weapons when the existence of the Russian state is at risk. So, you people better think twice before you decide to destroy Russia.
“when the existence of the Russian state is at risk” – that means, a preemptive use of the nukes is also possible.
What is “preemptive” about defending the very existence of the state? It doesn’t even matter if that is the doctrine or not, every nuclear power (UK, France, US, China, Russia, Israel, NK, Pakistan, China), without exception, will use nuclear weapons as a matter of course when the existence of the state is at risk. Why else would countries go to the expense of acquiring nukes?
The US, on the other hand, make a much more liberal use of nuclear force. The US will use nukes “when the vital interests of the US or one of its allies is in danger”. What is your vital interest? If that is the criteria for using nukes, then Germany should have nuked the US for destroying NordStream because the pipeline is the lifeline of the German economy. It is of vital interest to Germany
“will use nuclear weapons as a matter of course when the existence of the state at risk” – there is always a certain risk, that’s why the nukes are always ready to be used. What really does matter, is the degree of the risk and the price for coping with the problem without using the nukes. Using the nukes is also risky.
If you (or your country) face annihilation, that is an existential threat, an existential threat to the state. You will use the weapons you have to prevent that. There is no doubt about it. And it isn’t “preemptive,” it’s defensive.
The Russians view Nato encirclement as an existential threat. They will remove that threat by conventional means (since diplomacy did not work). Only if they face defeat by Nato, which could lead to the destruction of the Russian Federation, will they resort to nuclear weapons. This isn’t a game. After the Soviets defeated the Nazis, their Western allies (UK/US) planned to drop 300 nuclear bombs on all the major urban centers of the Soviet Union to kill about 400 million people. Luckily, the Soviets built their own nuclear bomb before the US was able to build enough bombs and carrier systems.
A cabal of American military leaders, General Patton in the forefront, wanted to attack the Soviet Union while it was still reeling from the loss of 20 million. It is why I believe Patton was murdered.
Who were the ones, other than Patton?
Here’s a good website with info about Patton. https://m.imdb.com/name/nm0666567/trivia
When the US withdrew from the ABM (Anti-Ballistic Missile) treaty, and more recently rescinded the INF (Intermediate Range Nuclear Forces) treaty, a message was sent. The message was that “we believe we can stop your missiles from hitting our territory. This enables us to strike first, without fear of a MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) reprisal.”
MAD has been the underlying basis of the START agreements since they began. I regret to say that the US has a long history of aggressively seeking workarounds to the agreements it has signed, followed by rescinding such agreements as soon as we think we have an overwhelming advantage. As a consequence, other nations have good reason to think that we do not negotiate in good faith.
Yes, and I am concerned that this belief, that the US can survive a nuclear attack, is at the base of the present neoconservative assault against Russia and China.
Rational Great Power political strategy would be to encourage a 3-way split of power between Russia, China, and the US, with the idea that any single power can be balanced by the other two so that no single power can dominate all.
But the current US trajectory is an attempt toward total world dominance. Naturally, Russia and China are united against that.
The U.S. has proven time and time again that they cannot be trusted and their word means nothing.
While MIC is dominating American politics, we will never have the peace and stability in the world. The best thing which we can achieve is the balance of the military powers in the world. That is why the militarization of Russia and China is welcome.
The arms race certainly is not welcome – by neither side. The Russians/Soviets disarmed unilaterally 30 years ago on the understanding that Nato would not expand into the space vacated by Russian troops. They pulled back half a million troops by more than 1,000 kilometers. Instead of disarming, the West kept on pushing back Russian influence by economic, political, and military means and by subversion. The Russians had to take a stand in Crimea or risk annihilation.
Since the Russians could not counter Nato encirclement by stationing Russian missiles in Canada and Mexico, they decided to use “military technical means” to reestablish the balance. There are signs that they have succeeded. The Russians have developed technology that the US cannot match, not in the foreseeable future. Moreover, if their doomsday torpedo does work as advertised the US geographic position of being protected by the Oceans on both side turns from an advantage into a disadvantage.
The US started the arms race by expanding Nato, unilaterally cancelling arms limitations treaties, etc. As a consequence, the US now faces a strengthened Russia, which forces the US to bankrupt its economy in the next spiral of the arms race. The US will not be defeated by military means. Neither Russia nor China have an appetite for that. The US empire will collapse like the British empire when its currency starts to plunge and investors leave the US economy.
The balance of power between superpowers is the only way to preserve world peace. The U.S. empire without any counterbalance has proved to be the greatest threat to world peace.
No one is destroying Russia. Russia is destroying itself after it decided to invade Ukraine and steal their land.
Yes. Don needs to read The Doomsday Machine by Daniel Ellsberg.
Maybe he keeps talking about it because the possibility of nuclear war is real. Something the idiots in Washington keep ignoring. It’s like you looking at this war as if it’s a sporting event.
Also, it was Biden who first brought nuclear war into the Ukraine discussion. For a long time, Russia diplomatically avoided the word ‘nuclear’ when discussing weapons, perhaps because when it gets into normal conversation then the idea of nuclear war becomes normal.
Which, I think, was actually Biden’s intent. And now we have a lot of Americans looking at the war like a football game: “Yeah, Biden, throw the bomb!”
It was J. Robert Oppenheimer who first brought nuclear war into the Ukraine discussion. Every discussion involving nuclear powers since the Trinity test has had nuclear war hanging over it.
Fair enough. If only we could find a way to put that djinn back into its bottle…
If this goes Nuclear, it won’t matter who fired first. In an all-out US/NATO-Russia nuclear war, we will all die. Even if the first nukes are “tactical”, still I see no mechanism that would prevent rapid escalation by tit-for-tat exchange into all-out ICBM war.
At that point, to look on the bright side, the war will be over in a couple of hours.
With millions suffered with radiation poisoning. I read On the Beach in one study hall hour in high school. The pages leaped out at my eyes. Then, I saw the movie version, the first one, starring Gregory Peck.
“tactical”
Thank you for putting quote marks around that word. It should be done with those or anything else that brings attention to a particular word. It is getting way too easy for the fools to use that word as a way of softening up people to the idea that a nuclear war can somehow be fought, and we can live to talk about it. Scary shit.
BECAUSE NO WAR IS ENTIRELY UNDER RATIONAL CONTROL.
This isn’t a video game, where neither side would do the irrational and the entire conflict is under complete control. As we continue to escalate, tensions increase. If nuclear war happens, both sides know it is better to get the first strike to drastically cut down the number of warheads their country will take. So both sides are aware the other might initiate a first strike if things get out of control.
So imagine that huge meteoroid that caused an enormous explosion over Russia a few years back. Imagine Ukraine has a few warheads left and decides if Ukraine won’t exist, neither will the world.
Imagine Russia suffers a military coup because of this, and someone worse than Putin gets control.
We have loaded the revolver, and we are continuing to add bullets while we play Russian roulette – WHY ARE IDIOTS COMING TO ANTI-WAR SITES TO ARGUE OTHERWISE?
Medvedev says things that Putin is most likely thinking. Idiot? I think you need to look to the West to find a whole cadre of idiots.
Probably because they are the only nuclear armed nation located in that area that is facing an existential threat>?
“if Saddam is building weapons then we have to stop him. with our weapons.”
…… pres G W Bush
Because of the greed and stupidity of the MIC and our war mongering leaders this stupid war is getting more dangerous for Europe and humanity every day.What will the US do when Fascist Ukraine surrenders after Russia wipes the floor with them.despite the flood of money,weapons and propaganda?
Our brainwashed masses will demand direct conflict. While Biden is running for re-election on a record of Nada and bupkiss.
West says, Russia invading and pumping weapons into Ukraine could also bring apocalypse.
This idiot is asking the world to allow Ukraine to get crushed by Russia.
Whereas the West (US) is asking Ukraine to be a sacrificial lamb in order to destroy Russia. And Ukraine is allowing it. Who is the real idiot?
More idiotic are the American volunteers, some former military, fighting. One was interviewed. He said that the new men at the front line of battle are dead in about four hours. He said the Russians are firing shells 24/7, just chewing up everything.
Such self-criticism! That last sentence seems to indicate you are pleading to the world by your askance.
Spain’s president is the latest to say the West is running short on ammunition to send Ukraine. Ukraine’s artillery is down to maybe 3,000 a day, while Russia is still firing 20,000 shells a day. Russia is slaughtering all resistance. Reaching their goal to disarm Ukraine.
But amateurs and liars only say “haha, look at the lines on the map, Russia is advancing so slowly, that’s a failure”. As if it’s a computer game where you need to capture gold and lumber on the map in order to create new troops and win the game.
At some point Biden and his collaborators will have to announce a reduction in aid to Ukraine. Maybe that’s why Biden’s handlers are reportedly going to present Zelensky with an “ultimatum” where he has to negotiate with Russia. When he won’t, they can declare that he isn’t being realistic and that’s why they’re cutting off arms supplies. Rather than admit that they have failed to compete with Russia’s arms production.
What will be next? Planet of the Apes…
see my post 13 hours ago Donna
“You maniacs! “You blew it up! Ah, damn you! God damn you all to hell!”
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8a950d2e667c2c4f6b9dc041404926a62ae10f38a868d0ac53d5ca8b1a57af2b.jpg
I think it’s obvious that’s what Wash. wants: ‘APOCALYPSE NOW’. The evil in Wash. is so pervasive. The gov. couldn’t wait to start another war that again has nothing to do with the USA. Even the ‘we must fight them over there,’ if we don’t want to fight them in America’, is again being used as the latest ploy. The whoppers continue every day, and they will until the USA is involved in WWIII.
https://www.indianpunchline.com/china-reboots-no-limit-partnership-with-russia/
China reboots ‘no limit’ partnership with Russia
Written by MK Bhadrakumar.
Everyone should put their nukes the table and play poker or maybe Russian Roulette. If nuclear war does break out, I will be drinking Black Russians.
John Mearsheimer, “The West is Playing Russian roulette”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBiV1h7Dm5E
And, Poland is playing Polish roulette, (that’s with an automatic pistol, not a revolver as in the Russian game.)
😂
And I’ll be serving them, Donna ( former bartender here!)
Openly discussing ‘nuclear apocalypse’ is the height of human arrogance and stupidity. Where are the peace makers or have they all been drinking from the same cup?…
Moving us away from nuclear apocalypse would reduce media clicks. This is emergent behavior in a society that has totally commodified life, pushing us to ruin and escaping our control.
If *The Guardian* decided to become anti-war tomorrow, the rest of the press would run headlines about it becoming PRO-RUSSIAN, RIGHT WING, AGAINST THE FORCES OF LIGHT, like what is happening to the NYT because they tried to be more balanced on the transgender stuff. The pressure to keep the outrage clicks flowing is so heavy that they can’t even report on Seymore Hersh’s expose. Our politics have become self-policing and self-reinforcing, creating ever more pressure to demonize any dissent as ACTUAL VIOLENCE. The same forces behind the BLM riots, mass censorship of the lab leak theory and many other strange occurrences of groupthink (gas stoves are evil) are now arrayed behind pushing us into ever more escalation; since de-escalation is what the deplorables (or someone, anyone who disagrees, proving disloyalty) want.
We just got through a decade of TRUMP:RUSSIA, TRUMP:RUSSIA, TRUMP:RUSSIA, and they NEED to destroy TRUMP:RUSSIA for crimes against their most holy moral agenda, which now includes sterilizing the planet. It doesn’t need to make sense, it won’t, because this behavior is emergent like schooling fish. All that matters is that UKRAINE gets clicks and makes money, and the *OTHER* finds escalating towards a nuclear war to be insane and bad, so more escalation inflicts more pain on the other.
It’s madness, and it’s the reason why we should have avoided nukes decades ago. Sooner or later nuclear weapons will fail into the hands of people who would rather kill their events than live, or who otherwise believe bad things don’t happen to them.
The Russian Defence Ministry advised that the United States was planning to organize a provocation in Ukraine with the use of toxic substances, the same false flag they used in Syria.
The US is opening 2 new fronts in the war against Russia……..Belarus and Moldova.
Zelenski of course got voted into power on a peace platform. The total betrayal of the working class in Ukraine is no different than anywhere else in the western world.
The answer to the working class betrayal by the oligarch parasites is simple, put limits on personal wealth, this will limit the damage (corruption) that they do.
Exactly. If you read in Western propaganda that Russia is undermining Moldova, it means that the U.S. empire is preparing to use Moldova as a Trojan donkey against Russia.
Why are we so angry that China is besting us on the economic front? Will we ever have enough enemies?