During a news conference on Friday, Secretary of State Antony Blinken announced he held a call with his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov on a potential bilateral prisoner exchange. A State Department official said the call lasted approximately 25 minutes. Washington and Moscow’s top diplomats discussed the Ukrainian grain export deal brokered by the UN and Turkey with Kiev and Moscow. Reportedly, also part of their dialogue was the role U.S. sanctions play in preventing the movement of Russian food supplies and fertilizer. This is the first time Blinken has spoken to Lavrov since February 15th, more than a week before Russia invaded Ukraine.
Five months into this war, amid the economic turmoil the American led sanctions blitz has caused, there is no indication that Blinken attempted to push for a ceasefire or negotiations to end the conflict.
The call appears to have primarily focused on a tentative deal for the release of two Americans that Russia has detained. Blinken described the call to reporters at the State Department as "a frank and direct conversation." Adding he "pressed the Kremlin to accept the substantial proposal that we put forth on the release of Paul Whelan and Brittney Griner." Whelan is a former US Marine who was charged and convicted on espionage charges, he is currently serving a 16-year sentence. Griner is a WNBA player who was arrested and is on trial for cannabis oil possession. She could face as much as a ten year sentence.
A source told Reuters that for the two Americans’ release, Washington is willing to exchange the Russian arms trafficker Viktor Bout. Bout is serving a 25-year prison sentence. The Russian Foreign Ministry issued a statement which says Lavrov told Blinken, in the future, Moscow would prefer to conduct such prisoner swap diplomacy in a more professional and quiet manner. Speaking at a news conference in Uzbekistan, Lavrov said talks on prisoner exchanges have been ongoing since last year’s summit in Geneva where Presidents Joe Biden and Vladimir Putin agreed to nominate officials to pursue the issue.
The US played no role in talks that led to the recent deal opening safe corridors to facilitate the export of grain and fertilizer from Ukraine’s heavily mined Black Sea ports. However, Blinken emphasized that "the world expects Russia to fulfill its commitments."
For his part, Lavrov told Blinken US sanctions have been a major factor in the global food crisis, adding Washington has not followed through on its promises regarding exemptions on Russian food exports. "Because, if it’s about Russian grain, US sanctions, in particular, have not permitted the contracts to be implemented in their full scope" Lavrov said.
Though US and EU sanctions contain exemptions for fertilizer, the Washington-led economic war still scares away banks, shipping companies, and insurance firms from working with Russia at all. This is a common occurrence when countries are targeted with heavy American sanctions campaigns. Sanctions on Iran technically have exemptions for medical goods but as UN experts have shown "banks and businesses, including pharmaceutical and medical companies around the world, over-comply with sanctions out of fear of potential penalties."
In June, it was reported that the US had begun quietly encouraging companies to buy and transport Russia’s fertilizer to lower global food prices. This month, after African leaders complained the West’s sanctions caused the continent’s lack of access to much needed Russian grain and fertilizer, the EU made plans to ease sanctions on some Russian banks to help allow such trade.
To the extent that the war was discussed, Blinken threatened Russia against moving forward with alleged plans of further annexations of territory in southern and eastern Ukraine. Blinken said "the world will not recognize annexations. We will impose additional significant costs on Russia if it moves forward with its plans." Lavrov said Moscow would meet the goals of its "special military operation."
According to the Russian Foreign Ministry, Lavrov also made clear to Blinken that Washington’s policy of fueling the war will only hurt Ukrainians, "the continuous pumping of US and NATO weapons into the armed forces of Ukraine…only prolongs the agony of the regime in Kyiv prolonging the conflict and multiplying the casualties.”
Top US and NATO leaders have said this war could go on for years. The US has already authorized $54 billion in aid for Kiev, a figure which represents mostly military spending. The US has poured billions of dollars of weapons into a "big black hole" in Ukraine to keep the war going. Biden recently declared at the NATO summit in Madrid that Americans and NATO will support Ukraine "as long as it takes" to defeat the Russians. In April, Pentagon Chief Lloyd Austin said the goal is to see the Russians "weakened." In March, Blinken said he expects to see "a strategic defeat" of Russia in Ukraine. "We’ll accomplish this by backing Ukrainians in their fight… devastating sanctions, the diplomatic isolation and other measures," he added. Lavrov has compared this situation to the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Tensions continue to rise in the war as Washington has the CIA openly deployed on the ground, "mostly" in Kiev, passing "massive amounts of intelligence" along to Kiev’s forces on the front lines. NATO special forces from at least Britain, Lithuania, Canada, and France are in Ukraine "training and advising" Russia’s enemies and providing "an on-the-ground conduit for weapons." This past weekend, after a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, a pair of House lawmakers visiting Kiev told Fox News they support American military advisors being deployed in Ukraine.
Reportedly, there are retired American special operators training Ukrainian troops close to where the action is, planning missions against Russian soldiers.
Antiwar.com recently asked the State Department whether Kiev’s "assurances" regarding a supposed prohibition on US provided High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems being used against Russian territory applied to the Crimean peninsula. A State Department spokesperson replied "Crimea is Ukraine." Former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev, currently serving as the deputy chair of Russia’s security council, has warned if Kiev attacks Crimea, it will mean "doomsday" for the Ukrainian leadership. Ukrainian Deputy Defense Minister Volodymyr Havrylov said Russia must "leave Crimea if they wish to exist as a country." Top Ukrainian military officials are also discussing using western supplied anti-ship missiles to soon target Russia’s Black Sea fleet.
In the midst of all of this chaos and brinkmanship, Biden has still not spoken with Putin. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban recently called for negotiations between Washington and Moscow. "A new strategy is needed, which should focus on peace negotiations instead of trying to win the war" he implored, adding the Russians want security guarantees only America can provide. The USrefused to discuss taking Kiev’s invitation to join NATO, Russia’s "brightest" redline, off the table. Zelensky has admitted that when he asked NATO about joining the alliance their response was "very clear, you’re not going to be a NATO member, but publicly, the doors will remain open."
On April 5th, the Washington Post reported that for "some in NATO, it’s better for the Ukrainians to keep fighting, and dying, than to achieve a peace that comes too early."
Connor Freeman is the assistant editor and a writer at the Libertarian Institute, primarily covering foreign policy. He is a co-host on Conflicts of Interest. His writing has been featured in media outlets such as Antiwar.com and Counterpunch, as well as the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity. He has also appeared on Liberty Weekly, Around the Empire, and Parallax Views. You can follow him on Twitter @FreemansMind96.
You want to read a total takedown of the US’ painful effort at “diplomacy”, read this from Andrei Martyanov.
Lavrov Picked Up The Phone.
https://smoothiex12.blogspot.com/2022/07/lavrov-picked-up-phone.html
Another take from MoA.
A Panicking Biden Administration Seeks Talks With Russia
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2022/07/a-panicking-biden-administration-seeks-talks-with-russia.html#more
Blinken is looking for some style points. Why talk about ending a war?
Blinken, Truss, Baerbock, just morons, all three are incompetent and useless compared with a competent and established diplomate like Mr. Lavrov.
Yes, it was all meant for domestic consumption –Washington looks out for its citizens (except with Israel); but, has got snookered by Lavrov. Now we’ll see if this in re Brittny and Paul was anything more than a propaganda stunt. Whatever Russia’s original suggestion (Max Bout??) it will now be dramatically raised.
While we swap prisoners, we also promise them a humiliating defeat in Ukraine.
Brittney Griner should rot in a prison for violating a nations laws or are all Americans above the laws in other countries?
Here, maybe this will help you figure it out.
It won’t.
By the way, good piece.
Your missing the moral conflict between the Law of Russia and the Requirement for Respect in Black Jock Culture requiring one to diss the law, … and brazen it out with lies.
Especially in a bastion of freedom like Putin’s Russia. She doesn’t have to worry about being charged with nonsensical victimless crimes like we have here in America. Oh wait!!
Sarcasm the lowest form of wit? Try slapstick, the worst you can do is fall flat on your face.
Its stunning how “useful idiots” easily fall into support of propaganda and censorship which ultimately supports the criminal elite agenda. It is intellectually lazy and cognitively dissonant to the truth. But the truth doesn’t matter right, its all post modernist narrative that creates reality right? Stalin would be proud.
I know it blows your mind but Russia is a bastion of freedom when compared to western totalitarian dictatorships. However i see your point about the nonsense crimes being charged in the US. Julian Assange immediately comes to mind.
Freedom of speech is the right to offend. It is not the jurisdiction of this publication to OK what can and cant be said, that is what we have “courts of law” for. This publication is lawless in its censorship while destroying the institutions that they pretend to protect. Antiwar my arse.
“I know it blows your mind but Russia is a bastion of freedom when compared to western totalitarian dictatorships.”
What blows my mind is that you think there is a difference.
“Usefull idiots” are just that. Useful to the “Empire of Lies” and is leading to the death of millions. Stalin would be proud. I cannot and will not support war.
Russia has not taken Ukraine’s sovereignty, US took it 2014. Russia has not attacked Ukraine, the 3rd Donbass war started on the 16th February when US proxy forces attacked the Donbass ie Russian citizens. The first 2 Donbass wars were started by US proxy forces and lead to peace agreements Minsk1 and Minsk2. These peace agreements were brokered by Russia and broken by US proxy forces. These are repeated supreme international crimes according to the Hague, the crime of aggression.
I repeat that Russia is a bastion of freedom when compared to western totalitarian dictatorships. You spread your propaganda on behalf of aggression against Russia. You turn truth on its head. Shame on you and shame on this publication for formally supporting your comment.
What blows my mind is that you think there is no difference. You support the supreme international criminals in their aggression against Russia.
Freedom of speech is the right to offend. It is not the jurisdiction of this publication to OK what can and cant be said, that is what we have “courts of law” for. This publication is lawless in its censorship while destroying the institutions that they pretend to protect. Antiwar my arse.
That Hitler was hell bent on destroying the SU did not make the latter the worlds bastion of freedom or indeed any kind of nice place to live. Similarly, that the USUK are the worlds biggest current aggressors does not make their current focus of aggression, Russia or China, particularly nice places.
Putins Russia and Xi’s China are not fun places to be, similar to Biden’s America … if you’re looking for relative freedom, I’d try small periphery modern nation like Switzerland, Portugal, Denmark, Costa Rica, Uruguay, etc.
Bigotry is an obstinate or unreasonable attachment to a belief or opinion. So i need to ask what your statement “Putins Russia and Xi’s China are not fun places to be” is based on?
I personally have not lived in Russia, China or the USA so i cant comment on how nice it is to be there. Have you?
Putin’s Russia? He is the president of Russia because a vast majority of Russian people voted him to be President. Its called democracy.
I am looking to make the place where i live a nice place to be. One that values freedom, democracy and law.
WE ALL SHOULD BE DOING THAT.
Based on? I live and breathe, my friend … and read and travel, a lot … I recommend it.
China and Russia are nobody’s idea of freedom, democracy, and rule of law. Again, that they are subject to relentless western propaganda does not make them good!
You remind me of people I knew in the old Soviet Union. They were so obviously propagandized by their govt that they wouldn’t even believe the correct parts of the message: the parts about crime, homelessness, crass arts. They thought it was all lies, until they came over and saw for themselves.
Bigotry is an obstinate or unreasonable attachment to a belief or opinion.
I personally have not lived in Russia, China or the USA so i cant comment on how nice it is to be there. Have you?
I live in a Western democratic fraud so what i say goes against the norm. I have travelled and read extensively hence my views against the norm.
Your statement “China and Russia are nobody’s idea of freedom, democracy, and rule of law” is an outright lie. Moscow has insisted that international law be applied in Ukraine. Moscow operates entirely within international law.
I know you struggle to accept this truth…..Bigotry is an obstinate or unreasonable attachment to a belief or opinion.
I agree.
My comment had nothing to do with Russia/Ukraine. I understand Russia’s grievances and have been vociferous about the belligerence towards Russia since the Cold War ended. But that has nothing to do with Russia being the bastion of freedom. We just got done talking about the ridiculousness of Britney Griner’s 10-year sentence. Do 10-year sentences for victimless crime equal a bastion of freedom to you? It’s as simple as that.
OK lets start getting some facts in place. Britney Griner has not been sentenced to 10 years. Sorry to deprive you of your 5 minutes of hate against Russia.
Sorry, my mistake. She could get 10 years. That makes it so much better. And I don’t hate Russia, I hate draconian laws that put people in prison. I told you, I agree with Russia’s concerns about their security. Stop trying to read into shit.
Totally agree.
Hmmm, the “crime” doesn’t really match the likely punishment, so I’d support efforts to help her out. But your larger point is spot on that, when we travel, we need to remember we are under another nation’s laws and subject to them. So be careful when you travel.
Indeed. Shame on her. But saying “rot in prison” leaves me to wonder and I’ll leave it at that.
Brittney Griner remains detained in Russia after the Russian Federal Customs Service claimed it found hashish oil in her luggage at an airport near Moscow.
In Singapore:
Those found guilty of trafficking more than 15g of pure heroin
(diamorphine) or 500g of cannabis face the mandatory death penalty.
15 grams = .03 pounds and 500 grams =1.1 pounds
And do you agree with those punishments?
Why do you think that Singapore is the cleanest nieces place on earth with NO drug abuse, no homeless, no graffiti, no major crime, and a hard working population that is civilized? Yes I agree 100% with those punishments!!
Sounds like a nice minimum-security prison.
And if marijuana gets you the death penalty, I can only assume other drugs, like cocaine, would get similar punishments. Geez, that’s a lot of white folk. Don jr. just put you on daddy’s list.
If marijuana gets the death penalty, I’d think hard drugs would get double death penalty … first they hang you, then they shoot you, and then you’re free to go …
Do you live in Singapore?
If not, why not?
BTW, Singapore does have drug abuse, homelessness, graffiti, “major crime” including rape and homcide, and unemployment. It’s no utopia.
Where did you get your information about Singapore from a Unicorns tail? You prove your low IQ with your drivel.
YES, I live in Singapore and have for 4 years, buddy! NO, there is no graffiti, major crime, homelessness, and drug abuse. There is also no litter, no homeless tent cities, and no trash in the streets.
When Singaporeans or foreigners are caught with any quantity of drugs trying to entice naive youth into a zombie life they are hung and disposed of as all drug dealers should be. If anyone is caught with drugs and using they are subject to 24 lashings and years in prison.
Only you who is not too bright would make unsubstantiated statement which you cannot back up with facts.
So not only do I live in Singapore, but I have an application in for a Permanent Residence – PR. Low crime, clean air and water, no homeless, highest IQ of any country at and average of 108, and mandatory military service make Singapore my choice to live and retire.
Our gain.
Happy for you and me. Sad to say I keep two homes one in Singapore and one in the US when I am not visiting other countries.
YES
Couldn’t wait now could you. Be happy that a life is shattered over an herb you fucking tool.
Correct grammar would dictate the use of a instead of an. ” shattered over an herb” should be written as shattered over a herb.
There is no happiness over someones stupidity. If you violate the law in another country you should be prepared to suffer the consequences of your actions. Uncivilized behavior in any country that violates their laws will get you arrested and jailed.
Is it your strongly held beliefs that American Exceptionalism means that laws do not apply to Americans as they travel the world?
So, what did “YES” mean? Sure seemed like you were happy. My strongly held beliefs are that draconian laws shouldn’t exist. Anywhere. I don’t argue the fact that she should have known better, that’s obvious. It’s just people like you coming out and using the argument that she got what she deserved, or she should rot in jail, tells me this has nothing to do with American Exceptionalism or any other bullshit excuse you want to toss out there. You already told us about your blissful life in the utopian haven of Singapore so it’s pretty obvious you have no use for any deviation from your way of thinking.
YEP!
Brittney Griner remains detained in Russia after the Russian Federal Customs Service claimed it found hashish oil in her luggage at an airport near Moscow.
Griner pled guilty to drug charges in Russian court on July 7. US officials claimed Griner had been “wrongfully detained.”
Griner’s trial is set to resume on August 2.
I have always drawn the distinction between personal use and supply. One should be decriminalised while the other is a very serious list of crimes. On the evidence provided it would appear that this is only a case of personal use.
Freedom of speech is the right to offend. It is not the jurisdiction of this publication to OK what can and cant be said, that is what we have “courts of law” for. This publication is lawless in its censorship while destroying the institutions that they pretend to protect. Antiwar my arse.
“I have always drawn the distinction between personal use and supply. One should be decriminalised while the other is a very serious list of crimes.”
Please tell me how there can be personal use without supply.
You can grow your own?
The distinction is that on the evidence provided Brittney Griner is not guilty of supply. I do get the point you are making though.
What would a parallel Russian offender get in US?
Depends on the jurisdiction, probably, but potentially something pretty harsh. And it would be out of Russia’s hands, if committed on US soil.
Well, at least it’s 25 minutes, not 0 minutes… Progress? I’m not hopeful.
Sanctions imposed by the US are what has caused the supply chain problems for the US.
The Western power’s criminal idiots are setting the world up for an economic global disaster, nothing will stop their idiocy.
Nobody dare to mention ” inconvenient truth ‘”
Public Warmongorised together with biased media” I just come up with that expression,
All it takes these 2 incompetent man; one is on the way down with second Covid19 (who says there is upside of Covid19!) Second one is you know who!
Swap the two Americans for Julian Assange.!
I’d love to see it, but I agree with some of the points raised against this move over on Moon of Alabama. 1. This would delegitimatize Assange and Wikileaks by making them out to be a Russian front, which is not true, but it will be interpreted that way by the US and its MICIMATT stooges. 2. Assange would have to agree to be used in this manner. Unlikely. 3. This is all premature talk on Blinken’s part, who should have learned in diplomacy school that such negotiations should not take place until there has been a conviction, and Assange hasn’t been convicted of anything yet.
Mexico is prepared to give him asylum. He could then choose another country. Once Free he can defend himself.. Assange would most certainly agree, I have no doubt about tha. But I agree it was just a bit of wishful thinking on my part. Neither US or Russia would contemplate such a swab. I don’t think Assange will continue with Wikileaks after the ordeal he experienced over the last 12 years.
What if Putin would do it? He would put the spotlight on the Americans and human rights
No matter what, they would always know how to twist it and make political hay out of it.
Free and healthy Assange, in a safe place could fight back better
if he wanted too or just enjoy his freedom and family.
No
NO ? Explain yourself
What part of NO do you not understand. No exchange, No letting criminals off the hook , and NO to anything the US or UK is begging for.
“Washington and Moscow’s top diplomats” Very droll, Mr Blinken . Please explain what possible use to anyone is the violence you wish to increase and intensify against the “democratic nation of Ukraine!!!!!” you claim to care about. Give us the casualty figures, the use of the “donated” money and weapons, and the success against Russia.
Our real problem is that the USA/NATO is controlled by insane criminals and corrupt cowards. There are no words left to describe them, morally they are the equals of Hitler. To watch the criminal insane clowns of both parties running the show, is enough to make one want to puke. The stupid Pelosi, another senile criminal, is the cherry on the cake.
It’s very Orwellian, isn’t it?…
The CDC Gave Big Tech Platforms Guidance On COVID Censorship. The CDC officials would flag specific posts by users on social media platforms.
Freedom of speech is the right to offend. It is not the jurisdiction of this publication to OK what can and cant be said, that is what we have “courts of law” for. This publication is lawless in its censorship while destroying the institutions that they pretend to protect. Antiwar my arse.
Did they discuss how the US was providing HIMAR targeting data to the Ukraine forces so they could shell a AZOV detention center in the Donbass? They did this to stop the Nazi’s giving testimony on the war crimes committed by the Banderites.
Freedom of speech is the right to offend. It is not the jurisdiction of this publication to OK what can and cant be said, that is what we have “courts of law” for. This publication is lawless in its censorship while destroying the institutions that they pretend to protect. Antiwar my arse.
All private websites reserve the right to police comments per their standards, whatever they may be. This has nothing to do with being antiwar.
I repeat this publication is lawless in its censorship (US constitution comes to mind) while destroying the institutions that they pretend to protect. The law decides what civilised society will accept, not vigilante propagandists.
Censorships breaks down civilised society by silencing truth. That is why they censor without law: to silence inconvenient truth.
The answer to bad speech is not censorship. Its more good speech. You cannot have freedom and censorship. Its stunning i even have to point this out.
Tell me you don’t know what “censorship” means without telling me you don’t know what “censorship” means.
First Amendment Hint: Are you suggesting that Antiwar.com is Congress?
The law decides what civilised society will accept, not vigilante propagandists. Especially one with an obstinate or unreasonable attachment to a belief or opinion. Because these are the people who censor.
btw not meaning you personally because to date you have been more than open to a discussion. Which is exactly how it should be.
I understand that if someone breaches the law on this site that you of course will take action as the law directs.
I object to the opinion that this site believes it can censor what people say because it is their right to do so. Hence the lawless comment, i understand that the US constitution prohibits the suppression of free speech.
Censorship is the suppression of speech, public communication, or other information. This may be done on the basis that such material is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or “inconvenient”. Censorship can be conducted by governments, private institutions and other controlling bodies.
Hence the reference to the US Constitution. My problem is who decides what is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or “inconvenient”. Congress? The law? or as in the case of Antiwar policy, antiwar does.
In the case of Antiwar.com’s policy, Antiwar.com does not decide what is considered objectionable, harmful, sensitive, or “inconvenient.”
We just decide what we are willing to host.
That doesn’t stop you from saying anything you want to say.
It just limits what you get to use our microphone for.
Very reasonable response thanks.
Let’s see if the site censors me pointing out you’re a moron. “This publication is lawless in its censorship”-NFS. There are no laws that apply to what content a site can decide not to publish. And this site is perhaps the single most important antiwar venue on the internet, though I’d need some more coffee to properly make that claim. Moron. And it’s not “Nazi’s” it’s “Nazis”. You apostrophe challenged nitwits need to just STFU.
“The world” needs to memo Blinken to stop speaking for it, since he plainly doesn’t. I think “the world” may have had about enough of that.
https://english.almayadeen.net/articles/analysis/the-eu-begins-the-start-to-retreat
The EU Begins the Start to Retreat. Alastair Crooke.