Israeli President Isaac Herzog said Wednesday that Iran’s nuclear program must be “neutralized” whether or not the Iran nuclear deal, known as the JCPOA, is revived.
Speaking at a ceremony for Israeli Air Force pilots, Herzog claimed Iran was the top threat in the Middle East. “I am following the negotiations surrounding the nuclear deal, and I call on the international community not to be led astray and not to underestimate the gravity of the threat,” he said.
“The Iranian nuclear threat must be neutralized once and for all, with or without an agreement. Iran must not be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons capabilities,” Herzog added.
Israel is accusing Iran of using the Vienna talks to buy time as it develops a bomb despite a lack of evidence that Tehran has decided to pursue nuclear weapons. The Israelis are urging the US to abandon the negotiations and increase the pressure on Iran through sanctions and potential military action.
Also on Wednesday, National Security advisor Jake Sullivan met with Herzog and other Israeli officials. According to a report from Axios, Sullivan reassured the Israelis that the US is willing to take a harder line against Iran if necessary, signaling that the Biden administration isn’t serious about giving Tehran sanctions relief.
150 thoughts on “Israeli President: Deal or No Deal, Iran’s Nuclear Program Must Be ‘Neutralized’”
Expel Israel from the UN and freeze all trade with them until they sign the NPT and disarm.
Who is going to facilitate that? Whoever does better stay out of airplanes.
No one, it is just my hopeless hope.
Expel Israel from Palestine!
Israel is Palestine.Peoples will have to get used to each other.
And certain people will have to get used to being second class citizens. Or worse.
They will just as soon as Israel’s start to act like people instead of wild rabid animals… Assuming they’re capable of it.
Hamas has stated for over a decade that they will accept a Palestinian State based on the Green Line borders with Israel if approved by a Palestinian referendum, along with an expulsion of illegal West Bank colonists (or their acquiescence to being subject to a sovereign Palestinian State). It is Israel that is preventing peace by constantly colonizing the West Bank against international law. Do not refer to their Charter, which is always a laughable and bad faith thing to bring up, as if if Hamas would only open a Word document of their Charter and delete the sentences dealing with the destruction of Israel… THEN they would believe them. What a joke.
Then Jews are the minority, and need to get used to that.
What are you trying to say?
My guess would be that what he’s trying to say is that the Israeli regime isn’t going to rule an Arab majority in the name of a Jewish minority forever. If it won’t withdraw from the territory it occupies outside its borders, there will eventually be one person, one vote.
Hence, the wisdom of Tel Aviv accepting UNR 181.
UN Resolution 181 describes the borders of the 2 states. These borders remain the sole internationally recognized borders.
181 is the only way to have a lasting peace and survival of the Jewish state. Otherwise it will be 1 man 1 vote
Never again. No taunts, no beard pullings,no pogroms, no Auschwitzes. Get used to it!
Ah yes, another “never again”. Jake’s way of saying he’s got nothing.
Its a concise answer to people who refuse to see reality.
That another Holocaust is just around every corner? Sure, that’s reality.
Iranis quite clear inits repeated statements-end the regieme.
Same as Israel repeatedly calling for regime change in Iran. They leave calling cards. Like sabotages and assassinations.
That is not a holocaust, that is replacing the apartheid government.
Get used to what? Israel being the only nuclear armed rogue state in the Middle East? I’m definitely use to that.
Why rogue-it is a free country.
Colonizing conquered territory is against international law
Recovering the lost homeland
This is precisely why Israel needs to be expelled from the UN. Irredentist nonsense like that has no place in international relations. Israel must be isolated and defunded utterly
HA HA HA! The “UN”-did nothing for Tibet, the Chinese Uhygurs,Burma,Sudan,Bosnia,The Fedayeen,ect ect ect. The UN exists only to promote globalism and create jobs.
The Jewish people have returned to their ancestral homes,stolen from them. I do hope that a fair and humane peace will one day be found. If you don’t like, well….
To be sure, I am no fan of the UN either. The UNSC veto power is basically self-defeating to its claimed mission, but it is the system of international law and relations that exists. Israel should be expelled from it.
I am also in favor of a fair and humane peace based on the Green Line. As is Hamas. You know who opposes that? The Israeli government. Until they dismantle every last settlement-colony and drag every last settler-colonist back over the Green Line where they belong, all Israeli expressions of hope for a just peace are brazen lies. If you don’t like that fact, well, it is because you are a lying Hasbarist.
Name calling is for children who stamp their feet. HA
“I am also in favor of a fair and humane peace based on the Green Line. As is Hamas. You know who opposes that? The Israeli government.”
He did say this. But as usual you ignore the gist of someone’s comment.
It’s amazing. Considering the history of Jewish persecution, I firmly assert the necessity of an independent Jewish-majority State. There were better places than Palestine, but it is what it is. Israel is going nowhere. While justice for Palestinians is the primary reason to call for a Palestinian State based on the Green Line, the fact is that demographic changes and comparative birth rates doom Israel as a Jewish State in the future unless they end the de facto annexation of the West Bank, withdraw completely, and drag the settlers with them. It is surreal to see the Israeli government pursue policies that doom itself.
Name calling? I didn’t call you a poopy butthead. I merely described you accurately.
Note your expected failure to respond with anything substantive to the fact that the impediment to peace is the Israeli government.
Comical – that an anti-Muslim like you would have concern now for Uhygurs.
There you go – maybe next the Romans will want their lost homelands during the days of their Empire.
Or we could give half of Europe back to the Germans…?
It’s a militaristic Middle East ethno/religious state which bans opposition political parties, censors the press, and holds those of its ideological opponents it doesn’t have murdered without charge or trial. The difference between it and the Iranian regime is the costumes.
“Bans opposition political parties”-they have multiple parties,including an Arab party, in the Knesset.
Yes, the political parties that they allow to run candidates for the Knesset sometimes get elected to the Knesset.
And the political parties that are banned entirely, or refused access to the ballot, don’t.
Bullshit. Kach, a right winged Israeli party was banned. Meanwhile the current coalition government includes the United Arab List which can bring down the government any time that it chooses. Arabs participate freely in the democracy, the press and the judiciary. Two Arabs have served in the Supreme Court of Israel. Gays flee the Palestinian territories to Israel. Try revealing yourself to be gay in Tehran or Gaza and see how high they hang you. So please Mr. Knapp, enough with the hyperbole. No country is perfect, and given the challenges that Israel faces, it is doing remarkably well.
I’m not sure what you said that you think disagreed with anything I said.
I agree that Israel is doing “remarkably well,” just like similar repressive ethno/religious apartheid garrison states (Iran, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, etc.).
You can do better than that, can’t you?
Doing remarkably well because of MY TAX DOLLARS!!!
Never again..you are a cheerleader for the mass murder and tyranny. You are on the wrong side and always have been.
Two wrongs don’t make a right
Its a bad situation for everybody.
UNR 181 is the only hope for the Jewish State to have a lasting, secure peace. The Likud wack jobs have led Israel into this dead end.
Come up with a new song.The leaders of future Israel accepted UNR 181,the Arabs rejected it.Arabs made war,Arabs lost. No do-overs. UNR 181 does not create a safe or viable state,by the way,and if Israel did accept,the Arabs would still want everyting.
You telling me Tel Aviv would accept 181 ?
not any more. what was then was then.
UNR 181 is the only hope to save the Jewish state; otherwise it’s going to eventually be one man one vote in the territory of the erstwhile British mandate.
That argument has led to Israelis being less secure. 70 years of failure. One would think someone would finally realize they’ve led the Jewish people into a dead end.
UNR 181 also happens to remain the only internationally recognized borders of the 2 states. Tel Aviv refusing to accept international law is not a winning strategy.
Your regime is doing to your own people what the Germans did to your people in the 1930s.
If Israel was THAT desperate to inflict major damage on Iran’s “nuclear program”, then why can’t they use diplomacy as a leverage? Iran was not the nation that reneged on the JCPOA. It was the USA(Israel). This threat only shows who the REAL nations are in this “conflict” that can’t be trusted. What other option does Iran have but to develop deterrent weapons under constant threat from Israel and its lapdog USA “leaders”! By USA/Israel’s reasoning, when push comes to shove it is the SHOVER who is the “terrorist”!
Iran has no nuclear weapons program. The pivotal 2007 NIE concluded that they have not had any military dimension since at least 2003. More likely than not, they have never had one since the Revolution. They have consistently condemned nuclear weapons as sinful and have called for the Middle East to be declared a nuclear weapons-free zone. There have been contrarian Ayatollahs and military leaders, but they have never shaped policy, which is encapsulated in the following quote from Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei. Unfortunately, I can no longer find the speech this quote is from, but it has always stuck with me:
“We have no belief in the atomic bomb and we do not pursue it. Our religious principles forbid the acquisition and use of such weapons of mass murder. We consider them symbols of destruction.”
To be honest, if I were an adviser to the Supreme Leader, my advice WOULD be to make a bomb for deterrence. On the other hand, the closure of Hormuz and the destruction of the Fifth Fleet are powerful deterrents on their own.
Certain academics in Tehran university studied the published information on Atomic weapons. As far as can be ascertained there was never any effort to intent to create a Bomb.
With their alliance with Russia-China axis, there is absolutely no reason to develop Nuclear weapons. Israel is so small that it can be flattened by purely conventional weapons.
Yep, israel is the size of New Jersey, an easy target prone to maximum causalities and large scale damage. It’s a concrete dump.
I use to live in New Jersey, your description gave me chills…However, I think that nuclear agreements, if managed properly are the way thru and forward.
Tom, IsraHell is incapable of diplomacy.
Force, genocide and apartheid are the the only things they know.
Amerikkka condemns every other nation on the planet for “human rights violations” but not only gives IsraHell a free ride, but actually finances it as well.
IsraHell needs to be NEUTERED.
Hi Gypsy: I admire your sand but…
How does anyone “neuter” Israel? By what methods?
Sometimes, I think we are “guilted” by Israel and it seems to work rather well, for the Israelis.
I admire YOUR desire to solve this situation via peaceful means. However after knowing what the Zios have and continue to do to the Palestinians, I want some payback!
I hear you Gypsy but in a complex situation, such as this, we need to take what we can get and hopefully avoid further escalations…
Your name suits you Gypsy, you are hotblooded as one would imagine the name implies. 🙂 So, for the sake of conversation, may I ask you, what does payback look like to you?…
I am part Gypsy, and several other ethnicities and races.
By “payback”, I mean :
Holding Israeli leaders and the IDF responsible for war crimes;
Unilaterally eliminating ALL illegal settlements;
And creating a two-state solution because the Palestinian will never have the same rights as Jews in “one Israel”.
Perhaps this is not so much “payback”” as “justice”, but the Israeli government, the IDF, and the violent settlers all need to be held accountable for their actions by an international court.
And just perhaps, some day they will be.
Agreed Gypsy, I whole heartedly agree!
Well done and well said. cheers
Exactly. It’s Israel’s nuclear threat needs eliminated. Malefactor SOP accusing its victim of its own perfidy.
Evict the UN;build public parks and housing.Diplomats will have to get honest work
According to Israel Iran is always a few months away from a nuke, be it the 1990s, 2000s, and now.
They used the same B.S in WW2 , the Germans where alway`s weeks , months from building a Atom Bomb the fact was they were years away from perfecting a bomb.
Nobody was publicly claiming that anyone was “weeks, months” from building an atom bomb in WW2.
While it was known that Germany was attempting to build a nuclear device, as was US,France and Great Britain’s Military and Governments, the science was still lagging, and no one, no one, had an inkling of just how much power such a device could produce or how to produce.
One has to remember that it was only mathematic theories and at that time only about 400 people in world were capable of understanding the physics.
It was mainly through Churchil, who always wanted more and more military he was force behind US efforts.
It was through a German aquaintence of Einstein that finally seeing fiends math told of program to President.
Secrecy was tighter back then than today and only real discussion was conflict of Cilian or military to be in charge..
Germany popular bad guy but even the few ex ????¿¿¿¿Nazi scientist contributed little, as th ey knew no more than Allies as equal learners and contributors..
Not a word in or by public of device was in open discussion, not in German, Italian, France, U Sor Brit universities held in check so no news outlets or College papers went a anywhere by those censoring boards.
Heisenberg said in 1939 that the physicists at the (second) meeting said that “in principle atomic bombs could be made…. it would take years…. not before five.” He said, “I didn’t report it to the Führer until two weeks later and very casually because I did not want the Führer to get so interested that he would order great efforts immediately to make the atomic bomb. Speer felt it was better that the whole thing should be dropped and the Führer also reacted that way.”
While the USA, Israel and Co. bomb and massacre at will in the Middle East, including victimizing a PEACEFUL Iranian “nuclear program”, Israel/USA wants the world to believe that Iran is the problem! The USA and Israel want Iran “neutralized” so they can raid the candy store, but Russia and China will certainly have something to say about that!
Zionist Nuclear Program Must Be ‘Neutralized’
I totally agree!
We are far past that, all the way to Israel doing it to many others.
Is that what the Canaanites said?
Israel has always seemed to believe that common man’s laws do not apply to them. They have nukes but have always tried to hide this fact. Hypocrisy to the extreme here!
He means “neutered”.
IMO it is Israel that should be nutralized .
More fantastic claims of Iran having a weapons program. These people are such incredible liars.
So the Israelis have just neutralised any hope of a treaty with Iran.
Iran knows that all US decisions are made in Tel Aviv.
They will continue the charade so that history will judge Iran innocent, but it is just theatre.
black is white,good is evil in the AW fantasy world.
Antisemitism abounds at AW dot com. Now I remember that’s one of the reasons I stopped visiting the site. Farewell.
The Palestinians are Semites too y’know.
Lame. The word “anti-semitism” was first used in the late 1800s to describe specifically discrimination and hate towards Jews
Well, some of our commenters are almost certainly anti-semites.
They’re not allowed to preach anti-semitism here, though.
But when your guest makes a crack about killing Christ,you are silent
When “my guest” makes a crack about killing Christ, I didn’t see it.
If you did, can you point it out?
Herod the Great was Jewish, you know.
The New Testament does allude to that, and Herod the Great was not a Roman.
and then there are the Israel-firsters who actually truly believe Israel can do no wrong, because they are “the chosen people”, e.g. master race/religion.
It is Israeli president who must be neutralized….!
It was neutralized, until Israel messed that up by wrecking the Deal.
Whose fault is that? Israel. Trump just did their bidding.
So now Israel can fix it. Put your own nukes on the negotiating table. Stop attacking, and make peace.
But no, Israel wants the US to wage a war on Iran to fix the problem that Israel created.
Why did Israel do this? They are not stupid. They did it as part of their long term plan to enlarge Israel by driving off Muslims, something for which Iran is a major impediment by its support of those Muslims. Turkey too, and the same damage is being done there.
I’m not sure what Iran needs to do to “prove” that they’re pursuing a bomb short of testing one. It’s clear that they are very close.
Pro tip: Before you link to a report purporting to demonstrate X, it’s probably worth reading the report to see if it even claims X.
Amateur reply to pro: read “worst case scenario”. The article does not take a position on whether Iran intends to build a bomb. It simply shows how close they are. And so I repeat…what must Iran do short of detonating one to prove that they seek the bomb?
Yes, it shows how close they are — if they busted ass, hard, they might be able to enrich enough uranium to weapons grade within months to build a single small, old-style, low-yield fission weapon that might or might not work and that they have no ability to deliver anywhere if it did.
Of course, there’s no evidence that they have any interest in doing that, and they’ve only been doing such enrichment since the US abrogated a deal under which they wouldn’t do it, on top of a previous deal (the Non-Proliferation Treaty) with which they’ve been in continued monitored compliance for more than 50 years.
If the Iranians actually wanted nukes they’d almost certainly already have them. The evidence says that they neither want them nor are trying to get them.
Former Iranian “moderate” president Rafsanjani essentially called Israel a “one bomb country”.
One Iranian gun-type uranium nuclear bomb, crudely built along the line of Little Boy dropped on Hiroshima, would have an instant kill radius of about 3 miles. If the Iranians delivered the weapon via a Hamas controlled ‘West Bank’ or an Iranian mini-sub off Tel Aviv’s coast, they could eradicate the Jewish state in an instant. There could be 2,000,000 killed and an additional 2,000,000 Jews in the coastal plain itself irradiated or wounded. The instant murder of 2,000,000 Jews and additional wounding of another 2,000,000 Jews out of apopulation of 6,000,000 would make for a rapid demise of the State of Israel.
So yes…all the Iranians need is one shitty little bomb. And frankly I don’t trust their fatwas and neither would anyone else with common sense.
And then what? What does Iran’s future look like after they “eradicate” Israel? Would they be eradicated in turn? Or are they hoping the superpower, whose congress makes laws to continue Israel’s QME, just won’t notice them killing 2 million people while wounding another 2 million?
I can’t read their mind. I can only listen to their words and observe their behaviour. Once again, these are President Rafasanjani’s words:
“If one day, the Islamic World is also equipped with weapons like those that Israel possesses now…then the use of even one nuclear bomb inside Israel will destroy everything. However, it will only harm the Islamic world. It is not irrational to contemplate such an eventuality.”
“It is not irrational” to sacrifice 10 or 20 million Muslims in order to destroy the Jewish state. So says the former “moderate” president of the Islamic Republic.
So I take him at his words. Why should Israel take a chance?
OK, so, listen to their words, then observe their behavior.
The words you quote point out that it’s “not irrational” to notice that nuking Israel would harm, not help, the Islamic world.
And their behavior is to abstain, in both word and action, from seeking a weapon to do so.
Yet the Israeli regime continues to take a huge chance, assuming that it can be unstintingly belligerent toward any regime it wants disempowered, and that its sugar daddy, the US regime, will never, ever, ever stop writing checks and deploying troops to ensure that Israel suffers no consequences whatsoever for its behavior.
I agree that that’s not a wise chance to take.
You really have to have a wild imagination to come to the conclusion that you did based on what Rafasanjani said. What part of “only harm” didn’t you understand?
Is this more clear to you?
Hashemi Rafsanjani, a former president of Iran, boasted in 2004 that an Iranian attack would kill as many as five million Jews. Mr. Rafsanjani estimated that even if Israel retaliated with its own nuclear bombs, Iran would probably lose about 15 million people, which he said would be a small “sacrifice” of the billion Muslims in the world.
Yes, it’s clear to me that you want that outcome. If you didn’t want that outcome you’d stop supporting US and Israeli policies which make it MUCH more likely that the Iranians will decide they want nukes after all — and if they want nukes, they WILL get nukes.
Of course I don’t want that outcome. I’ve had enough of my family incinerated already. Israel’s “belligerence” is preemptive. If Iran was developing advanced nuclear technology but was not so openly hostile and threatening to Israel, there would not be a problem.
If you don’t want that outcome, why do you support the policies most likely to produce that outcome?
In 1967, Israel launched a successful pre-emptive war against enemies threatening to “push the Jews into the sea”. The enemy today is Iran, but the threats are the same. History is an unforgiving teacher. It’s easy to be a pacifist in North America.
At least you admit it.
Israel would “admit” it. Nothing new here…except to you apparently
Well, it is illegal under international law. And even under conditions where it would be allowed:
“A preventive war is a war or military action initiated to prevent a belligerent or neutral party from acquiring a capability for attacking. The party being attacked has a latent threat capability or has shown by its posturing that it intends to attack in the future”
And since Menachem Begin himself admitted that those conditions weren’t met then I guess you’re acknowledging Israel violated international law. But So what. Nothing new here. Right?
“Few Americans realize that we in US intelligence had long since concluded that Israel had been grossly exaggerating the Arab “threat” in early 1967. Fifteen years later, in 1982, former Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin publicly confessed:”
“In June 1967, we had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that [Egyptian President] Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.”
Egypt blockaded the Straits of Tiran, an international waterway to Israeli shipping. They threw UN troops out of the Sinai and amassed troops on Israel’s border. In a speech to Arab Trade Unionists on 26 May, Nasser declared his real objective: “The battle will be a general one and our basic objective will be to destroy Israel.”
So spare me your revisionist Wikipedia history lesson
I also quoted Begin.
Remember the USS LIBERTY!
So you’re also a staunch, old Soviet Union supporter because they had 20 million “incinerated” or murdered in that conflict.
Explain your comment please
Explain every single one of your comments , puleeze.
Here: Accredidation for your words provided for you:
Furthermore, Alan Dershowitz isn’t exactly an unbiased person who seems to always put Israel’s interests above ours.
Show me a link. And how about talking about Israel’s threats towards Iran since 1980? Or I should say the prodding of their bought superpower to attack for them since their type of fighting only consists of shooting fish in a barrel type scenarios.
Read some history books my friend
I have. None quoted Alan Dershowitz.
Curtis LeMay wanted to use nukes during the Cuban Missile Crisis too, and MacArthur wanted to use nukes against the Chinese – but that is past history.
The fact is NOW, that Israel is the aggressor in the Middle East, carrying out airstrikes against their neighbors, killing scientists, and just plain carrying out “acts of war” against any neighbor who wants better treatment of all of the residents of that so-called Western Style democracy.
Would you have opposed assassinations of German or Japanese scientists working to develop nuclear weapons during WW2?
Would you have opposed Israeli nuclear scientists being killed?
I would. Israel never threatened to destroy Iran. The Germans would have used their nukes had they developed them. I’m not convinced the Iranians wouldn’t given their past statements.
Israel has threatened to take out anybody and everybody if they are going down. Compared to Iran, who you can only speculate on, there is no ambiguity.
Iran never threatened to destroy Israel. That was your and the West’s interpretation of what he said. He was referring to the Israeli regime/government, just like people’s even within their own countries dislike their governing policies/government.
That would be a good question if it was true that the Iranian scientists killed by Israel were in fact working on developing nuclear weapons. But Israel never relies on facts and instead just repeats their wild exaggerations as they have for the past 30 years.
Common sense would dictate either believing the Iranians or not, not believing them when you think they’ve said something that comports with the fairy tale you’re telling yourself and disbelieving them when they’ve said something that doesn’t.
Common sense would also dictate that if the Iranians were as militarily capable and adventurous as you fantasize them to be, they would have quickly and permanently settled matters to their military and political advantage in e.g. Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, etc., instead of messing around for 40 years.
You seem to be believing what you want to believe about Iran — and Israel — because it’s what you want to believe, not because there’s good evidence for it. Kind of reminds me of the guy I ran into at the movie theater the other day who told me that Kobe Bryant faked his own death because Hillary Clinton had put out a contract on him, and that Kobe and JFK Jr. (also John Lennon AND John Denver) are coming back Real Soon Now to destroy the global pedophile conspiracy.
Common sense would dictate that when successive Iranian leaders call for the eradication and annihilation of the”Zionist entity”, for the removal of the “cancerous tumour” that is Israel, and for another “final solution”, we Jews take them at their word. This is especially so when they are feverishly working towards and are so close to possessing the technological means to do so. None of this is what I “want to believe”. It is fact
Common sense would dictate that when successive Iranian leaders have made great use of political rhetoric about doing X, without ever making any attempt to actually do X, they’re doing what politicians do — promise things that they think the people whose support they need will like, without either the capability or intention of doing X. Here in America, we’ve had politicians promising to eliminate drugs, poverty, communism, etc. for a century. And they are no closer to doing so than the Iranians are to “possessing the technology” to destroy Israel.
I get the rhetoric, but you can’t possibly believe what you’re saying. There’s a difference between promising to fight a drug war or poverty, and making direct, open, and clear intentions to commit genocide. And you most certainly know that the Iranians are very close to obtaining a nuclear weapon and could cross that threshold within months.
Since 1948, there have been two types of Muslim politicians in the Middle East: The kind that promise to destroy Israel REAL SOON NOW, and the kind that are either politically or literally dead. And yet somehow Israel remains not only un-destroyed, but eternally belligerent without significant consequence.
And the chances of the Iranians obtaining a nuclear weapon within months, unless they 1) actually decide they want one and 2) proceed to buy one from the Russians or the Chinese, are about as good as me suddenly sprouting wings and flying up to take a dump on the surface of the moon on live television.
Are you sure about that? I guess you and I don’t have to live with the consequences of misjudging the Ayatollahs. Israel has no room to err. And when they say they want to kill you, and are developing the technology to do it, you must take them seriously.
So Mr Knapp…don’t forget to flush!
Evidently though, you’re just fine with the over-the-top violence by Israeli occupiers against the indigenous Palestinian people. You can flush the projectile vomit I spewed in your direction.
Maybe you should consult your Rabbis to rid Israel of nukes?
So only a war that possibly Israel would bring on itself is now labeled “genocide”.
Maybe your nuclear “Goliath” in the Middle East if they did something really heroic and civilized and stated tomorrow, they are signing the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, inviting international observers in to witness the destruction of their massive nuclear weapons arsenal. Then, and only then, would they not appear to be the hypocrites they prove they are every time they bemoan Iran’s nuclear bomb (that they don’t have).
If we went by that nut job Netanyahu and his comical cartoon at the UN where he presented his Road Runner-type drawing of Iran’s nuclear bomb intentions showing them at 95% to getting it, Iran would have 100 nukes by now. He and his regime used the same tactic to destroy Iraq – using our men and women as pawns in that dastardly war.
And if you went back far enough, Iran, according to Israel, would be neck and neck with Russia and the US in numbers of nukes they possess.
……..and “homelessness” Thomas.
Zionist entity – has always referred to the government of Israel and their apartheid, master race policies against their own inhabitants that they lord it over
The “Jewish State” I always called it Israel because the Israel Worshippers, including themselves, call themselves a “Western Style” democracy, and Western Style democracies don’t call themselves “the Catholic State” or “the Protestant State” or whatever religious State.
Well then it must be very clear that every nation that uses nuclear power is “very close” to a bomb.
Even if they did produce “a bomb” it would be used as a deterrent to Israel’s “bombs”
Right John.. Israhell’s REAL, ACTUAL nuclear bombs.
Only one way can stop the eventual loss of Ilife identity and economies of Iran or sutviveble to survive, outlaw AIPAC over the 300 posing as humanitan and cultural program NGOs that are but are no more than Israely lobbyist
Tell them they are big boys now and are too old to stay under US giving them alloances of billions yeearl.
Go home and fight own battles
If Israel is so damn concerned about Iran they can go and fight them without us. If they did start some crap with Iran I would hope the Iranians would give Israel a painful bloody nose. Bullies deserve to be kicked good and hard.
So how does Israel propose to ‘neuter’ Iran?… Sanctions and Military Action… This sounds like a war waiting to happen…
Comments are closed.