Major Russian officials today have warned of military threats posed by the U.S.-led thirty-nation North Atlantic Treaty Organization to its western border: its entire western border. And its northern one as well.
Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu announced that Russia has redeployed two armies and three Airborne Forces units to its western border as part of what he termed an ongoing readiness inspection.
In one of the sternest warnings issued by a Russian official in the post-Cold War era, Shoigu added, “We’ve taken proper measures in response to the alliance’s military activities which threaten Russia.” Regarding the ground and airborne forces, the defense minister said: “The troops have manifested complete preparedness and the ability to perform their duties to guarantee the country’s military security. At the present time, these units are involved in exercises.”
He also warned that NATO is now concentrating over 40,000 troops and 15,000 items of armaments and military hardware as well as strategic aircraft near the Russian border, stating: “The troops in Europe are moving towards Russian borders. The basic forces are being amassed in the Black Sea area and in the Baltic region.” He also mentioned the preponderance of U.S. military personnel in those deployments, as the Pentagon is reinforcing troops in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Poland.
In addition he highlighted the fact that: “The alliance annually holds up to 40 large operational training measures of a clearly anti-Russian bias in Europe. In the spring of this year, the NATO allied forces launched Defender Europe 2021 drills, the largest exercise over the past 30 years.” (Estimates range as high as 37,000 U.S. and NATO troops involved in the several-weeks-long war games from the Baltic to the Black Seas and the Balkans.)
The Russian defense minister pointed out that Russia’s western border wasn’t the only location where the U.S. and NATO were threatening his nation. He alsoexpressed alarm over the U.S. and NATO military build-up on Russia’s northern flank, the Arctic. He said: “The competition between the world’s leading powers for access to the Arctic Ocean’s resource and transport routes is increasing. The US and its NATO allies increase their naval and ground groups in the Arctic, increase the combat training intensity, extend and upgrade the military infrastructure.”
In general Shoigu stated that over the past three years NATO has increased its activity along Russia’s borders.
Also today Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov warned that American warships deployed in the Black Sea off Russia’s coast were a provocation. He was speaking as two U.S. guided-missile destroyers, USS Donald Cook and USS Roosevelt, both equipped to carry 56 Tomahawk cruise missiles and an undisclosed number of Standard Missile-3 anti-ballistic missiles, are to enter the Black Sea tomorrow and the following day. Earlier this year the guided-missile destroyers USS Donald Cook, USS Thomas Hudner and USS Porter and the guided-missile cruiser USS Monterey were in the Black Sea for exercises, often two at a time. (The most, in terms of tonnage, allowed by the 1936 Montreux Convention, though Turkey’s proposed Ankara Canal may eliminate that limit.)
Ryabkov said that American warships sailing thousands of miles from U.S. naval bases “always involves a geopolitics element.”
His comments are worth citing extensively:
“I wouldn’t like to go too much into particulars of various interpretations of what freedom of navigation and freedom of the seas is, especially in this context. I know one thing: American ships have absolutely nothing to do near our coasts, and this is a purely provocative undertaking. It’s provocative in the literal sense of this word: they’re testing our patience and getting on our nerves. This won’t work.”
And he issued this stark admonition in the context of the Western threats to Russia over Ukraine:
“Apparently seeing itself as the queen of the seas […] the U.S. should understand after all that the risks of various incidents are very high. We warn the U.S. that it should steer clear of Crimea and our Black Sea coast. This would be to their own benefit.”
His warning is a timely one as Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba is at NATO headquarters today, where U.S. Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin arrives tomorrow and Secretary of State Antony Blinken shortly after him.
Rick Rozoff has been involved in anti-war and anti-interventionist work in various capacities for forty years. He lives in Chicago, Illinois. He is the manager of Stop NATO. This originally appeared at Anti-Bellum.
10 thoughts on “Russia Deploys Two Armies, Three Airborne Units to Counter Threat From 40,000 NATO Troops on Its Border”
WoW… & WTF…!!!!!!!!!! Who could think that Ole Uncle Joe would get maneuvered into such a fraught & reckless corner in red lined areas. Still, I’m sure Russia has the stuff to bring the curtain down hard if things get too much to their disfavor fast. All these confrontations are really risky. The kind of games the old play that kill the young when they go bad.
Looks like more posturing. The levels of build up – 40 thousand NATO personnel, 4 thousand Russians, these are far too low for a major conflict. Based on this, they’re not planning anything.
All this is being done while fully aware that we only have 2 minutes to midnight. Sleep baby
Strategic ocean chokepoints. Authored by Valery Kulikov.
Ocean chokepoints are not strategic, don’t even matter, if there is nothing on the other side of the choke point to be reached.
If at war with the US, to which country might China even want to send merchant ships? Brazil? Africa? The destinations are already controlled on the other side of those choke points.
China and Russia are Mackinder’s center. They are inherently less reliant on what is to the other side of choke points. Their own land periphery are the destinations. Hence Belt and Road, over land.
Yes, they might like to buy Australian coal, but that is not in the cards in the event of war whether or not they face ocean shipping choke points.
They have nowhere to go, so an inability to get there is not the issue.
Sweden, Switzerland, Austria and Finland are not in NATO.
They are neutral and nobody (east or west) fears them as a threat.
That should be the correct course for Ukraine.
That should be the correct course for all countries!
It’s interesting how when NATO puts troops on the Russian border that’s just fine, but when Russia puts troops on the Ukrainian border that’s terrible.
Because one side is sweet and good, and the other is evil. /s
Cold war. Everything they do threatens the other.
This is exactly why spinning up a cold war to serve domestic politics is fundamentally criminal. It is what we said of people like Kaiser Wilhelm when he did it. Now we do it.
Comments are closed.