New data from the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) has shown a roughly 4% increase in military spending for 2019, the single largest rate of growth seen in the past 10 years.
The increase is being driven in large part by the two largest military spenders in the world, the United States and China. Both nations increased their respective spending by 6.6%. The US alone increased spending $53.4 billion, which is itself almost as much as other major nations, like Britain, spend on their entire national defense budget.
Since the US is by far the biggest single spender on the military, it makes sense that their increase would drive an increase worldwide. China, though a distant second, appears to be trying to keep up with America in increasing their spending. Still, the US spends nearly three times as much as China annually.
Spending was also on the rise across Europe, up 4.2% from the previous year, and at the highest levels since before 2008. The NATO spending increases which are driving this are the result of US demands.
In this regard, the impulse to keep spending on the US front probably is not so shared in NATO, with many of the big economies in Europe, particularly Germany, resistant to surge spending to meet US expectations, with the public in such nations preferring to focus on their economy.
It’s hard to blame the public for resisting such spending increases, as most of Europe is not bordering any specific enemies, or even rivals, and has no reason to believe their military would have to engage in defensive operations. In NATO, the more likely result of such spending is to get convinced to send more troops to the Russian frontier, and then spend more money, continuing that cycle of escalation.
President Trump demands more spending out of NATO, however, and many nations are trying to placate him with their own modest increases. Where that ends is anyone’s guess, but the US long-term goal is to get Europe to spend vastly more, with the presumption they’ll be buying US made weapons.
China’s own increases are driven primarily by tensions with the US, as the Pentagon makes much of challenging China in the South China Sea, and the surrounding area. China seems determined to deter any overt US actions, and so far the Pentagon just sends ships to make nominal challenges to Chinese claims.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2f02c8fb1a2b6fb090502b2b9bbbddbf5c3c927ea1d766debed95cf204fac189.jpg
“Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.” – Dwight D. Eisenhower
Ike correctly saw the MIC as the greatest threat to democracy in the USA. The influence it has on Congress negates its role as a representative body that is responsive to the will of the electorate. Sadly, he didn’t know that he was only overseeing the beginnings of this transfer of power to the corporatist (fascist) bi-partisan political entity known as the Anglo-Zionist Empire.
Fortunately for the world, the Empire is now on the ropes. The cost of projecting military might all around the globe has bankrupted us. Russia and China can do more with less because, unlike the USA, their militaries are primarily defensive rather than offensive. Russia has developed missile technology that will thwart any plans for a first-strike nuclear attack on them. China can sink a US carrier with a swarm of hypersonic anti-ship missiles at a small fraction of the cost of replacing the carrier and its unfortunate crew.
Europe is in the process of uniting with Russia, China, and almost 70 other nations in the new Belt and Road Initiative which will be the end of our dollar tyranny and plundering of the planet’s resources. The banksters are soon going to pull the plug on the US economy and we’ll be lucky if we end up as “hewers of wood and drawers of water” for them, as they’ve taken down empires in the past and left them as destitute empty shells of their former selves. It’s now only a matter of time, folks. Get used to it. Reality bites.
Notice how Ike waited until he was leaving before saying that. He knew.
“China’s own increases are driven primarily by tensions with the US”
Which means the headline should have read: “US Drives Surge in Global Military Spending”
Again, China’s military is primarily defensive, unlike that of the US.
Look again. It is always the USA, with already the greatest spending, which pushes, bribes or frightens others to join in the race although the USA is NOT in any existential danger and its constant threats and use of economic sanctions make more enemies. The word “defense” is used but we saw from “9∕11” that the USA is not able to defend itself (using the official version of that event!!). Pentagon staff and intelligent others know that the Russian weapons costing perhaps a tenth of the US wasteful MIC items are actually defensive and the US is producing large targets that can and will be stopped by Russian defenses. Pres. Putin clearly described all this nearly two years ago (March 1, 2018) to sneers of “boasting” by US pundits. China is a close Russian ally and is buying Russian defense needs, as are so many other countries.
The idea that spending a lot makes the products better is false.
Look at the US elections!!!!!