During a two-hour lunch at the White House, and then later at the State  of the Union speech, President Trump played up the idea of a war against  Iran, presenting a conflict as all but a foregone conclusion, and  suggesting it just depends “which road they choose.”
 
 During his lunch, Trump told reporters that the war against Iran was “closer than you thought.”  The White House declined to comment on this, insisting the lunch was  “off the record” and that it was unethical for the reporters to ask  about it. 
 
 Trump talked further at the State of the Union, cheering “proud Iranians  raising their voices against unresponsive rulers,” and crediting his  sanctions for Iran’s economy doing “very poorly.”
 
 Trump demanded Iran give up its pursuit of nuclear weapons, despite  consistent evidence showing Iran is not seeking such weapons in the  first place, and suggested Iran’s leaders are “too proud or too foolish”  to accept US demands. 
 
 Trump once again appeared to blithely suggest that whether Iran accepts  the demands, adding “let’s see which road they choose, it is totally up  to them.” This is much more ominous combined with warnings about the war  during his lunch. 
 
 While Trump’s other State of the Union topics for the Middle East  focused on the ISIS war being over, and the Afghan War potentially  ending, on Iran he appeared to be talking up further escalation, while  crediting himself for the killing of Iran’s Gen. Qassem Soleimani,  adding to the narrative surrounding launching such a war. 
 
Trump: Iran War Was ‘Closer Than You Thought’
Says Iranian officials 'too proud or too foolish' to accept demands
			Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
			Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
    ×
    
      
    
  


