Three rockets hit the US Embassy compound in Baghdad on Sunday, and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, in keeping with his foreign policy priorities, was quick to make this all about Iran, despite a conspicuous lack of evidence Iran was in any way involved. 
 
 Pompeo called Iraqi PM Adel Abdul Mahdi to express this outrage, telling  him that Iran’s attack demonstrated a “wanton disregard for Iraqi  sovereignty.” The State Department also pushed Iraq to do something to  protect the embassy. 
 
 But who actually fired the rockets? That’s not clear at all. Iraq’s Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), the government-run Shi’ite militia group  that the US usually just calls Iran for narrative’s sake, has denied  any involvement. One of the PMF groups, Asaib Ahl al-Haq, pointed out  that the type of rocket that hit the embassy wasn’t even the type any of  the groups field anymore, saying it was old and not used in years by  any of the militias. 
 
 That should be fairly easy to confirm for the US as well, since a lot of  the PMF groups are armed by the Iraqi government, which is armed by the  US. Iran, likewise, wouldn’t be depending on very outdated rockets, as  the US has consistently played up the threat posed by Iran’s large,  advanced missile program.
 
 Pompeo has long been an advocate of US hostility toward Iran, and  anything that happens even close to Iran he makes sure is blamed on  them. The lack of evidence is, as ever, a reason to take his position  with a grain of salt, but it’s clearly never been an obstacle for him  before, and won’t be now. 
 
 
Lacking Evidence, Pompeo Blames Iran for Rocket Fire on Baghdad Embassy
Accuses Iran of 'wanton disregard for Iraqi sovereignty' 
			Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
			Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
    ×
    
      
    
  


