As media outlets try to explain away spending weeks hyping up a North
Korean “Christmas gift” action that never actually happened, the
possibility that they were just wrong seems to be a staggering blind
spot, as they seek analysts who will offer an explanation for North
Korea not doing anything.
The Pentagon did some things, so maybe that was related? The Washington Times got quotes
from hawkish analysts who were eager to praise provocative Pentagon
actions as both deliberate, and a wise form of deterrence that may well
have scared North Korea away from the tests that the media was 100% sure
were going to happen.
The Pentagon not only sent multiple surveillance planes into North
Korea’s frontier, a very dangerous provocation, but also leaked a
November drill in which they practiced raiding and assassinating North
Korean leaders.
While North Korea hasn’t responded to either of these incidents, it’s
not hard to see how they would see them. It is vindication for North
Korea’s perception that the US is not genuinely interested in peace
overtures, and still sees military aggression as their go-to solution.
Clearly, the drill was another preparation for a US military attack.
The analysts’ response not just tries to dial back the North Korea
situation to one where only military deterrence is an option, but tries
to credit the military for having the foresight to publicly do so,
ignoring that it undercut the Trump Administration’s stated goal of
diplomacy, and did so with a military drill of the sort President Trump
had long banned explicitly because it was so provocative.
Pentagon’s Haphazard North Korea Ops Spun as Deterrence
Analysts try to credit US threats for lack of North Korea test
Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
×