The trial of 11 people accused of being in the Saudi “kill team” that  murdered Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi ended with an announcement  Monday. Eight were convicted, and five were sentenced to death. 
 
 Far from the culpability much of the world sought, however, there is  deep criticism of what was seen as a careful effort to manage the  narrative of the murder, and cover up the guilt of higher ranking  officials. UN officials lambasted it as a “mockery of justice.”
 
 The main focuses of the trial were that Saudi al-Qahtani, a top aide to  the Saudi crown prince, was totally exonerated. This was tantamount to  exonerating the prince himself, who most believe ordered the killing in  the first place. 
 
 On top of that, the official conclusion of the trial also tried to  rubber stamp the existing Saudi narrative on the murder, saying that the  kill team had no premeditated plan to kill the journalist, and that it  just sort of happened spontaneously. 
 
 Investigations and analysis generally believe the crown prince ordered  the kill team specifically to kidnap and kill Khashoggi, and dispose of  his body. This led to calls for the US to cut back ties and arms sales to the Saudis, though President Trump broadly accepted the Saudis’  narrative, and resisted Congressional bills aimed to cut those sales.  
UN Critical After Saudis Sentence Five to Death in Khashoggi Murder
'Mockery of justice' as court exonerates top aide to crown prince 
			Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
			Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
    ×
    
      
    
  


