Iranian authorities are struggling to get their stories straight on the
capture of the British oil tanker Stena Impero this past week, with the Iranian Guardian Council spokesman suggesting it was purely a “reciprocal action” for Britain capturing an Iranian tanker earlier this month.
The Iranian Ports and Maritime Department, however, didn’t mention this
at all. Rather, they focused on the specific legal pretext of the
seizure, which presented the Stena Impero as having engaged in a sort of
hit-and-run accident in the Strait of Hormuz.
Officials maintain that the Stena Impero had collided with an Iranian fishing vessel, then
refused to respond when the fishing vessel tried to contact them.
Previous reports indicated that the tanker also shut off its transponder
in the area, though its not clear when that happened.
Iranian boats came out and captured the tanker at that point. Iranian
officials say that refusing to answer was a violation of maritime
regulations, and the Foreign Ministry says they’ll have to go through the legal process for this matter.
Whether that legal process happens or not remains to be seen, and there
seems to be a fairly good chance that at the end of the day, the two
nations simply trade their tankers back to one another in some sort of
compromise.
Iran Says British Tanker Hit a Fishing Boat, Refused Contact
Spokesman confirms incident was also 'reciprocal act' for Britain taking their tanker
Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
×