The flurry of amendments to the 2020 National Defense Authorization Act  (NDAA) moving through the House of Representatives is finally wrapping  up Friday, where a series of Thursday night debates gave way to key  votes early Friday on some contentious issues. 
 Major subjects of those debates included amendments that aim to end both  the 2001 and 2002 Authorizations for Use of Military Force (AUMF). The  2001 repeal passed 237-183, while the 2002 repeal passed even easier at  242-180.
 Debates on the AUMF centered on concern that the authorizations could be  used by President Trump or future presidents to authorize wars they  were never intended for. The aim is to replace the 2001 version with  something more current on the global war on terror, and to do away with  the 2002 version entirely, since its main goal was to unseat the  long-dead Saddam Hussein and conquer Iraq, now a US ally. Opponents of  the repeals argued it would tie President Trump’s hands, and that other  recent presidents have gotten to launch unauthorized wars without  Congress getting in the way. 
 Which was also a big topic of the debate for another amendment, the  preemptive defunding of any US attack on Iran that comes without an  explicit Congressional authorization. This passed 250-170.
 Bill supporters argued that Iran is just too big of a war to get sucked  into without Congress having any say in the matter, while opponents  insisted that Congress is so slow in approving wars we’d never get an  attack on Iran off the ground without a president doing it unilaterally.  
 This was a particularly important vote because President Trump has  argued he doesn’t need Congressional authorization to attack Iran. While  that’s legally incorrect, he may have been de facto right, since he’s  been vetoing War Powers Act challenges to other unauthorized wars.  Congress thus is using the power of the purse to ensure that there is no  money allowed to be spent on such an illegal war.
These amendments join several others passed on Thursday, including amendments blocking arms sales to Saudi Arabia, and the defunding of the US war in Yemen, the subject of the aforementioned War Powers challenges.
Once passed in the House, the NDAA will have to be reconciled with the Senate version, which doesn’t include a number of these amendments. The House, however, is expected to stand firm on these matters. President Trump has threatened to veto the House version, which could mean that the NDAA remains up in the air, as Congress may try to override, or see which side blinks first.
The NDAA ultimately passed 220-197.


