While the House continues to add amendments to their $733 billion
military spending bill, aimed at limiting the administration from making
unilateral foreign policy moves, the White House is now “strongly
objecting” to it.
White House officials issued a statement warning that if the House version was what was submitted to them for the military spending bill, President Trump would veto it. That would be a serious challenge to Congress exercising limits on the foreign policy.
In particular, the House bill forbids transfers of new detainees to
Guantanamo Bay, and provides no funding for tactical nuclear weapons.
The White House objects to both, but can Trump just veto around it?
That’s less clear. While Trump has vetoed other legislation on foreign
policy, a spending bill still needs to ultimately be passed, and this
would be a battle of who blinks first, or if Congress can override a
veto outright.
Well he cannot lin veto, and if there is no money bill then there can be no money spent, yay no Iranian war!
Maybe that is Congress’s plan. Send up a spending bill that Trump will not sign. Thus no more money for America’s wars…
Careful. Reagan bypassed Congress, sold cocaine in Inner Cities and missiles to Iran, to finance illegal wars. Republicans think having Gawd on their side gives them a free pass.
In a fuzzy, warm world the veto would be for the ridiculous amount of $733 billion and not about the asinine reasons that are given. We are f**ked. It’s only a matter of time.
Watching the USA operate in the world is like watching a slow-motion train wreck. “The Leader” is intent on marching us right over a cliff. Not enough tactical nukes, indeed. Don’t worry, Donald, there’s enough “black money” in the budget to buy you and Satanyahu all the toys you want. Once you start flinging those nukes around the crazy Christian Zionists like Pence and Pompeo will start creaming in their jeans and you’ll be re-elected sure as Pete. Of course the world will be a shambles and not fit for human habitation, but they’ll all be raptured up to heaven, so who cares.
It doesn’t ‘need to ultimately be passed’! Nothing could be better than Trump vetoing it and Congress being unable to pass an alternative overriding the veto. Maybe that mountain of $100 bills would actually get spent on something useful and life-affirming. Probably not, but there’s a chance.
Imagine the outcry of “not supporting the troops”. It would be deafening and would come from both sides of the aisle. One way or another they’ll get the money eventually.
Probably eventually, yes. But the harder everyone digs in their heels the better: I want new nukes! (Trump) vs We want to stop Trump from attacking Iran without our say-so (Congress). This could fundamentally change the narrative to: Why is our foreign policy so stupid and do we really need such extravagant toys to implement it? They’d spend a lot more on the VA if they cared a bit about the troops.
Promise?
I’m pretty sure the constitution says the president can declare war anywhere he wants, and if congress disagrees, he can veto them.
I’m pretty sure you’re an idiot.
A veto of the bill will be the best August gift ever!