It is no mystery that the Trump Administration has some major hawks, and
that the likes of Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and John Bolton are
just itching for an opportunity to start a US war against Iran.
Weeks of mounting tensions with Iran saw Pompeo taking point on talking
up the escalation. President Trump would occasionally chime in on its
opposition to having a war, but Pompeo is still seen trying to coax Trump into some sort of military action.
He’s not alone after Thursday’s attack was called off, either. Media outlets are pushing Trump broadly about not following through, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) is predicting that Iran will attack a US ship if a war isn’t started.
Then there’s Bolton, the hawk of all hawks. He both typifies the
administration’s effort to try to steer the US toward a conflict, and
President Trump’s dismissive response, as he mockingly suggested that if
it was up to Bolton he’s “take on the whole world at one time.”
Trump is not wrong there, and that is a reason not to listen to Bolton
on matters of war, but it also leaves open the question of why Bolton is
being kept on in a key position.
At the very least, Trump’s skepticism about an Iran war is keeping him out of the war so far. And yet, Pompeo et al continue to try to sell the narrative of Iran
being an aggressive enemy. It’s not clear how deeply committed Trump is
to avoiding a war, but we are likely to find out, because the people
pressing him to go to war aren’t going anywhere.
Pompeo and Other Hawks Try to Steer Trump Into War With Iran
Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
×