Senate hopes for a quick rubber stamping of this year’s National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA), the huge military spending bill, will be on
hold until next week. The hold-up is being blamed on Sen. Rand Paul
(R-KY), who has often showed willingness to stall big votes.
Sen. Paul is keen to see an open debate on the NDAA.
He has 30 hours of debate time on the bill, and unlike everyone else,
he apparently isn’t willing to yield all that time without saying
anything.
Paul has six amendments of his own he wants to introduce and get a vote
on. Leadership apparently wasn’t so inclined, but Paul can block other
Senators’ amendments if his don’t get a vote.
Paul’s amendments include an effort to repeal the 2001 war
authorization, a prohibition on indefinite detention, and a call to
withdraw US forces from Afghanistan within the next year.
Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK) is arguing that the leadership needs to prohibit
Paul’s amendments from getting a vote, saying that if they let him get
amendments considered, then other Senators will try the same tactic to
get their own votes. He argues that if everyone is allowed to introduce
amendments “no matter what” then you’d never get a bill finished.
Good for him
“then you’d never get a bill finished.”
That would be wonderful.
“Paul’s amendments include an effort to repeal the 2001 war authorization, a prohibition on indefinite detention, and a call to withdraw US forces from Afghanistan within the next year.”
Paul/Gabbard 2020
or
Gabbard/Paul 2020
To me, that seems like a great ticket, either way. Paul’s amendments sound great to me .. So, let’s get those amendments done. Repeal the 2001 war authorization, a prohibition on indefinite detention, and a call to withdraw all remaining US troops from Afghanistan within the next year.
Paul/Gabbard 2020
or
Gabbard/Paul 2020
I’m all for it.
Yes exactly!!! Rand & Tulsi would be the peace and prosperity ticket. analagous to the Union ticket of 1864. It is almost as important to save our republic to reign in this war machine as it was to suppress the slaveholders rebellion of 1861-1865. Sorry for weird phrasing of that but you know what I mean … Tulsi would never be assassinated if Rand were her V.P. just sayin …
Give this Paul speed bump some love. So says Mr. Stewart.
“If anyone was allowed to introduce amendments ….. you’d never get a bill passed.” Translation: The Congressional leadership couldn’t guarantee passage of the exact legislation written by K street lobbyists.