Two major US arms-makers, Raytheon and United Technologies, have announced on Monday that they have agreed to a merger. The combined company is to be called Raytheon Technologies.
Both companies are extremely influential, and combined will be the
second-largest maker of military equipment, with $74 billion in annual
sales. President Trump has expressed concern that the merged company would be less competitive, and too powerful.
Raytheon CEO Tom Kennedy downplayed this, saying that the two companies
are mostly not competitive with one another in the first place, and will
benefit from being able to combine their complementary technologies
going forward.
Suggesting that the existing US arms market is any sort of level playing
field that the merger might put at risk is going to be difficult in its
own right. This week alone Congress is investigating a sacked State Department official, and former Raytheon lobbyist,
for pushing through billions of dollars in Raytheon exports while at
the State Department, and pushing the administration to bypass
Congressional oversight that might threaten those sales.
It seems hard to argue, indeed, that the merger might make these huge
companies any more influential, as they already dominate the halls of
power in great measure. With the administration obsessed with growing
arms exports, parts of the government already work as de facto sales
teams for these companies, and it’s hard to imagine, even if some
officials have qualms, that they don’t have more than enough influence
to push through a merger above any real objections.
Defense Giants Raytheon and United Technologies Merge
Trump worries merger will be bad for competition
Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
×