When US and Russian warships run afoul of one another in international
waters, it is very common for one side or the other to blame the other
ship for behaving unprofessionally. On Friday, the US and Russia are
both blaming one another for such an incident.
The incident took place in the East China Sea, at around 11:45 am. The
USS Chancellorsville, a US guided-missile cruiser and the Admiral
Vinogradov, an anti-submarine destroyer, were sailing alongside one
another. Suddenly, the US
cruiser changed direction and cut across the course of the Russian
destroyer, forcing the Russian ship to make an emergency maneuver to avoid a collision.
Exactly who is to blame at that point seems to be a matter of opinion.
The two ships got within 50 meters of one another in the course of all
this. Russian officials accused the US Navy of “hooliganism” for cutting
them off as it did, while the US Navy claimed Russia’s ship made an
“unsafe maneuver” when it apparently cut to try to avoid a collision.
The two ships were certainly worryingly close to one another, per videos released by the US Navy, and accusing Russia of doing something unsafe is in keeping with US policy, so it makes sense that’s what the narrative coming out of the Pentagon is.
Yet it certainly does seem that the US warship earned at least some of the blame for what almost happened.
It’s not clear why the two ships were so close in the first place, but
even given the destroyer’s superior maneuverability, the US ship plainly
shouldn’t have changed course to cut across their existing path.
The USS Chancellorsville is part of the US 7th Fleet, which has had more
than its share of difficulties at sea in recent years, with US cruisers
running aground or smacking into civilian ships, sometimes with deadly
results. It was certainly fortunate that today’s incident did not end
that way, as it could have grave consequences for US-Russia relations.
This dispute is rather strange: is the US asserting that the international rules of the road do not apply (which are in simplistic terms):
the vessel to starboard (right side) has right of way, the other vessel must give way; i.e. in this case, russian ship was starboard vessel.
What is the US’ argument as to why the russian ship was in the wrong-I do not understand other than this might be the standard us response, do not confuse with facts, we have our narrative.
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/06/us-navy-cruiser-ignored-rules-at-sea-caused-near-collision-with-russian-destroyer-.html#more
There are conflicting stories of who is to blame. Russia is always and invariably blamed by the western media, so I am more inclined to believe the Russian explanation of events. America has a much greater motive to blame Russia.
Yes, I’ve always noticed that “US planes intercept” Russian planes while “Russian planes buzz” US planes and the first always occurs “near the US coast” while the latter always occurs “in international waters” (it always turns out that “near the US coast” is “in international waters” too, way down in the story).
Considering how much land the Pentagon owns and/or occupies around the world, “near the US coast” could mean anything…
The Russian ship was privaleged according to the international rules of navigation. The US ship followed the USS vessel according to the USS John M a rules for having collisions.
“We can’t shoot these guys, but at least we can have some fun with them.” – Top Gun
Such incidents are symptoms of the gradual movement towards war, where the core interests of rival nuclear powers will collide.
https://www.ghostsofhistory.wordpress.com/