When US and Russian warships run afoul of one another in international
waters, it is very common for one side or the other to blame the other
ship for behaving unprofessionally. On Friday, the US and Russia are
both blaming one another for such an incident.
The incident took place in the East China Sea, at around 11:45 am. The
USS Chancellorsville, a US guided-missile cruiser and the Admiral
Vinogradov, an anti-submarine destroyer, were sailing alongside one
another. Suddenly, the US
cruiser changed direction and cut across the course of the Russian
destroyer, forcing the Russian ship to make an emergency maneuver to avoid a collision.
Exactly who is to blame at that point seems to be a matter of opinion.
The two ships got within 50 meters of one another in the course of all
this. Russian officials accused the US Navy of “hooliganism” for cutting
them off as it did, while the US Navy claimed Russia’s ship made an
“unsafe maneuver” when it apparently cut to try to avoid a collision.
The two ships were certainly worryingly close to one another, per videos released by the US Navy, and accusing Russia of doing something unsafe is in keeping with US policy, so it makes sense that’s what the narrative coming out of the Pentagon is.
Yet it certainly does seem that the US warship earned at least some of the blame for what almost happened.
It’s not clear why the two ships were so close in the first place, but
even given the destroyer’s superior maneuverability, the US ship plainly
shouldn’t have changed course to cut across their existing path.
The USS Chancellorsville is part of the US 7th Fleet, which has had more
than its share of difficulties at sea in recent years, with US cruisers
running aground or smacking into civilian ships, sometimes with deadly
results. It was certainly fortunate that today’s incident did not end
that way, as it could have grave consequences for US-Russia relations.
US, Russia Trade Blame After Warships Nearly Collide in East China Sea
Ships passed within 50 meters of one another
Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
×