The Trump Administration still can’t make its mind up on Iran. After Trump told reporters on Thursday that he didn’t think the US needed any more troops in the Middle East, he announced Friday morning that he has approved a new deployment of 1,500 US troops.
Trump didn’t indicate what changed his mind on the matter of troops, and
instead focused heavily on emphasizing to reporters that the deployment
is “relatively small,” at least compared to the 10,000 the Pentagon
initially requested.
Still, any troops continue the US buildup toward a military
confrontation with Iran, and Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan
underscored that, presenting the deployment as meant to counter “the
ongoing threat posed by Iranian forces.”
Which again, President Trump said wasn’t a thing in the first place.
Earlier this week, Trump announced that there was no indication anything
had happened with Iran, or that anything would happen in the future
with them. A Congressional briefing from the Pentagon on secret
intelligence only added to the doubts about the case for war, and had
many accusing the administration hawks doing a repeat of the 2002-2003
deception that led to the US invasion and occupation of Iraq.
It’s not clear from the reports so far where the 1,500 troops will
actually be sent in the region. The Bolton/Pompeo narrative would make
Iraq the obvious choice, but Iraq is so angry at the US for talking up
war as it is, that trying to put more war-related troops in Iraq would
almost ensure a diplomatic blowback.
Trump Announces 1,500 More US Troops Being Sent to Middle East
SecDef: Troops will counter 'ongoing threat' of Iran
Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
×