The narrative of an “increased threat” posed by Iran and its proxies
across the Middle East is being used to justify a US military buildup
and a general escalation of tensions in the area. British Maj. Gen.
Chris Ghika, however, has raised serious doubts about that.
Maj. Gen. Ghika said that there has been “no increased threat from Iranian-backed forces,”
despite the claims from US officials, mostly Secretary of State Mike
Pompeo and John Bolton. Perhaps more damningly, Ghika says he does not
believe there is any daylight between Britain’s assessment of “no
increased threat” and the assessment from US intelligence.
In other words, the US officials are lying about the intelligence,
presumably to justify the growing US buildup and to keep hyping the
possibility of a war with Iran. US Central Command, however, angrily shot back contradicting Ghika, insisting his statement runs counter to established US position on the matter.
CENTCOM’s statement is not exactly a refutation of Ghika’s position on
UK and US intelligence. Rather, it refers to “identified credible
threats” but provides no indication where they came from. It clearly
wasn’t intelligence agencies, because the threats were only made
available to intelligence agencies after their identification.
Early reports on the “Iranian proxies” allegation suggested it came out
of Israel, and that it was built around Israeli officials believing it
would make sense for Iran to do that sort of thing to attack the US.
This could suggest it was never verified by US or UK intelligence, and
was rather just accepted as the official version because it fit with US
policy at the time.
UK General: No Sign of Increased Threats From Iran or ‘Proxies’
Says UK intelligence is in line with US intelligence on the matter
Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
×