The US interest in staying in Syria is built around long-term goals that
aren’t particularly clear, but which are predicated on the idea that
the Kurdish SDF will retain control over a massive percentage of Syria.
The problem is that while the SDF controls materially all of Syrian
Kurdish territory (outside of what Turkey already sacked), they also
control huge amounts of territory that they seized from ISIS, and which
the local Arab tribesmen are increasingly keen to see returned to local
control.
This is fueling protests among Arabs under Kurdish rule,
which the Kurds are confusing of benefiting Iran and Turkey, and
undermining their military victory against ISIS. It’s also undermining
the one piece of status quo the US is happy about in Syria, a vast
SDF-controlled east.
The SDF’s plan so far seems to be to just kill them, with SDF forces
showing up in Deir Ezzor during a protest, and opening fire on the
demonstrators, killing seven and sending the rest scattering.
History would tell us that killing protesters isn’t a solution to
protesting, but the Kurds don’t seem to have an alternate strategy at
the moment, and so long as they can fit the words Iran or ISIS into the
explanation, the US probably won’t object too loudly.
Anti-Kurd Protests Seen as a Threat to US Plans in Syria
Kurdish forces kill seven protesters at latest rally
Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
×