Continuing to try to adjust the narrative of US meddling in Venezuelan,
officials have settled on a new course of action in the past few days:
flat out lying. Officials, and parts of the US media, are now referring to Juan Guaido as the “duly elected president of Venezuela.”
In reality, Guaido was not duly elected as president, nor indeed did he
ever participate in a Venezuelan general election for president. He was
elected to parliament in 2015, and has risen to a position of
substantial power within parliament, in no small part because of US
support.
Then in January the Trump Administration started pushing Guaido to try
to take the country over. The legal pretext was that the constitution
allows the head of parliament to be an “interim president” if the
president-elect doesn’t show up for his inauguration.
President Maduro was actually inaugurated on January 10, after being
elected. He held the inauguration in front of the Supreme Court instead
of the Assembly building however, which led some to claim it didn’t
count. The US wanted to see Guaido replace Maduro, however, so they
insisted that this was fine, and Guaido is president now.
While the US recognizing Guaido’s on-paper takeover as legitimate was a
fairly cynical move, calling him duly elected president is an absolute
lie. It’s not even clear where this lie started, though it is clearly
spreading.
US Officials, Media Falsely Present Venezuela’s Guaido as ‘Duly Elected President’
Media parrots Pompeo's declaration that Guaido was 'duly elected'
Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
×