The US Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit issued a brief order on Monday ruling that whistleblower Chelsea Manning must remain in jail on contempt charges for refusing to answer grand jury questions in March.
The government wanted Manning to testify against WikiLeaks before a
grand jury to build a case against them in general, and founder Julian
Assange in particular. Court filings show Manning believes her jailing
is an attempt to undermine her testimony in future cases.
Manning’s ongoing, and seemingly open-ended detention seems to be
centered on the recent detention of Assange in Britain, and US hopes to
ultimately acquire him through extradition.
If the US does get him, they appear to want Manning in jail waiting to
testify, or at the very least to harm her ability to testify as a
defense witness on Assange’s behalf. Yet this is potentially a very long
process, with Britain likely loathe to extradite Assange to the US,
where he might be executed.
This effectively means the court is going to be holding Manning,
potentially for years on end, for refusing to testify in a case that
doesn’t exist, and may ultimately never exist.
Appeals Court Won’t Release Chelsea Manning From Jail
Detention appears open-ended pending Assange extradition bid
Jason Ditz is Senior Editor for Antiwar.com. He has 20 years of experience in foreign policy research and his work has appeared in The American Conservative, Responsible Statecraft, Forbes, Toronto Star, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, Providence Journal, Washington Times, and the Detroit Free Press.
Join the Discussion!
We welcome thoughtful and respectful comments. Hateful language, illegal content, or attacks against Antiwar.com will be removed.
For more details, please see our Comment Policy.
×