As the administration tries to negotiate an end to the Afghan War with
the Taliban, the opponents of a pullout are increasingly intent on
playing up the threat to the US homeland posed by other factions within
Afghanistan. In particular, this has focused on the local ISIS
affiliate.
ISIS-K, which operates primarily out of Afghanistan’s Nangarhar
Province, and in the neighboring part of Pakistan has carried out a number of attacks in Afghanistan and Pakistan
over the last several years. Being repeatedly declared defeated by the
Afghan government, the group has survived and even grown in
sophistication.
An unnamed US intelligence official now says that the ISIS-K has the inclination, and might have the capacity to carry out strikes overseas, and that this might well mean an attack in the United States.
The intended implication is that ISIS-K needs to be challenged by the US
military. The reality, however, is that the US military has been
attacking ISIS-K for years, and have accomplished little in doing so.
By contrast, the Taliban has shown an ability to rout the ISIS-K when
their territories have intersected, and with the peace deal including
the Taliban promising to keep ISIS out of Afghanistan, the US might find
that a peace deal will do a better job at foiling ISIS-K than the 18
years of occupation ever did.
Since ISIS can set up shop anywhere, the USA must occupy the entire world.
Of course, ISIS wouldn’t exist without US meddling in the Middle East. And the MIC wins. Lots of cushy DC jobs.
sambor, it is all about the oil and Israel O’ Israel….Remember the USS Liberty!
Scary. Yeah, okay. But what did Kim Kardashian wear today?
Golly to save 100B a year I think I will take that risk. Put that money to improve healthcare or infrastructure and I bet net even with some terrorist attacks fewer Americans would die.
Well, well, maybe if we really fear terrorist attacking the USA, we might demand that the demoncrats work with Prez. Trump to secure the Southern border!!! WTF!
Close the borders and start mass deportations and this ceases to be a problem. It was our idiotic immigration system that brought us 9/11.
And yet that idiotic immigration system was far closer to “closed borders” than it was at any time prior to 1947, when the number of 9/11 type terror attacks came to a grand total of zero.
So in a sense, you’re right — go back to the historical American system of open borders and associated policies (like not interfering militarily around the world) and we’re probably going to be much safer. But I doubt that’s what you meant.
Who gets deported? Do we go by color? Religion? Last names that aren’t white sounding?
Let ISIS set up shop in Afghanistan. That way they’ll be mired down for the next 18 years, just like us, and we’ll know exactly where they are.
ISIS Khorasan! Another CIA creation. First it was mythical. Just a phantom to. give military new purpose . Now as Taliban is strong enough and united enough to negotiate trkul withdrawal — we need ISIS K to Y and Z , to create poblems for Taliban and Pakistan. Those more optimistic of neocons are hoping for problems all the way to
Central Asia. Dream on, Pompeo. For one, where are the underwriters going to come from? And where are you going to find fiery preachers of Islamic cult, now that MbS took Wahhabi establishment out of this business? And what do these fanciful neocons think — they can endlessly hoodwink the region into giving them space for “confronting” this or that. SCO has counterterrorist organization center set up in Tajikistan, and all Central Asia now has terrorist monitoring in place. And even among the most susceptible locals the alure of Western support for headchopping democracy has worn off. They may not know much, but always know what in their world counts. The Imperial West has been stopped at the gates of Damascus. Israel is having tantrums
until adults have enough. And all that is rely left of ISIS are thousands of women and children, that nobody wants. Specially not those Western countries that djd e erything possible to entice them to go and fight “butcher” Assad. And Pakistan is no longer American LaWhore. And Modi seems to be abead in elections in India in spite of all subtle and not so subtle ways be was undermined. The genius being bombing of Indian soldiers, with Pakistani terrorists the culprits. This was to made Modi weak, put Pakistan in hot seat, and undermine both. Modi looked decisive, Pakistan contrite and conciliatory, came down on free lancing groups with vengeance. End result? Both are moving on. Expected complications to Modi during election season avoided.
But one never knows. Our privatized CIA has many masters, of which Gena is not one. Her job is to execute and communicate what private owners of CIA wish. Does anyone think that a person like Brennan would talk this bold and arrogant without mighty backing?
But no matter their verbal provesse, and power of visualization. They cannot resurect ISIS from dead. Here and there, some losers without any states in the region or beyond helping them — it will be a non-starter. With Saudis spreading the word against joining Wesfern sponsored causes, this is over.
Note what is happening in Sudan. With “democracy” student orvanizers drawing in crowds at fever pitch, military stepped in, promissed two year transitikn. The targeted leader accussed of the usual xerox crimes, but too long in power, this is a way to clear the table. Saudis recognize the transitition and give money to assist, Russia following with recignititikn and military asistance. “Democracy” leaders and NGO. s pissed off, but they will be isolated from the majority of population that will not want to go against military, who actually welcome military rule. It will be inferesting to see nust how much mire money will be thrown at regime change push jn Sudan. Thid is an attempt to break up Red Sea alliance of Evypt, Shdan and Saudi Arabia that want to keep US out kf controlling Bab Al Mandeb, that is, Yemen. But now US bas no ally or vasal, and Sudan was most vulnerable. Neocon in desparate mode.