US-Russia relations are seemingly always on the cusp of a new post-Cold
War low, and with many of the traditional channels of communication
already severed, the US has generally responded to every new strain by
cutting ties even further. Diplomats are expelled, talks are canceled,
and the two sides are further isolated from one another.
US Army Gen. Curtis Scaparrrotti, the top NATO commander in Europe,
warns that this is a mistake. Scaparrotti says he believes communication
is a key part of deterrence and that in that way the US “should have more communication with Russia.”
It isn’t that the general doesn’t understand the desire to keep Russia
at arm’s length. He conceded that it “doesn’t have to be a lot” of
increased communication. He said, however, that the two sides need to
understand each other better, and why they are each doing what they’re
doing.
This argument will be tough to sell to politicians for whom the idea
that Russia can be understood is near blasphemy. To the general,
however, having basic information about the general intentions of both
sides greatly reduces the chances of the two sides blundering heedlessly
into a calamitous war.
The linked article did a fine job, but the similar one Fox / Faux News put out managed to editorialize with the old American dogma: There’s a good side and a bad side, the bad side is not us, our actions when any occur are mere reactions to their inexplicable continuous stream of bad behavior.
Thank the Democrat Party for inventing a “Russian collusion” fiction that resulted in estranging the US and Russia for over 2 years,
giving us a new Cold War.
Election 2012: Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney called Russia “without question our number one geopolitical foe”
Romney = irrelevant.
Point is, it’s both parties. It’s not like either party actually wants to get along with Russia since the MIC needs a boogeyman and both parties are beholden to MIC money.
Trump wants dialogue with Russia as he is doing with China and NKorea.
It’s just difficult when the other party will castigate any talks as being part of their false “collusion” narrative.
I’m not necessarily pro-Repub, but
condemning any dialogue as “collusion” just for political gain, is insanity.
Whether it’s the collusion narrative or just the plain old reliable “weak on Russia” claim, the one the party not in power always uses, the results would be the same. That was the point of the poster who brought up Romney. This has been ongoing for decades.
The manufactured “Russian collusion” farce,
was a coup attempt that put the country at risk because the MIC doesn’t like an outsider like Trump.
There has never been an inside the govt weaponization of FBI, DoJ, CIA etc. against a political candidate complete with fake FISA warrants and a
Sp. Prosecutor in the history of the nation.
The entire attempt was a fraud.
I’m not arguing about the Russian collusion. My point was that Russia bashing has been going on by the party not in power for decades. And whether there was an attempted coup or not, it doesn’t change the fact that Trump’s actions towards Russia don’t coincide with his supposed desire to get along with them. In fact, he’s been more belligerent towards them than Obama. More sanctions, more diplomats expelled, selling weapons to Ukraine that even Obama backed off from, siding with Ukraine on Crimea and the naval incident, telling Russia to stay out of Venezuela, not wanting to give Russia a heads up during one of the missile attacks on Syria(Russia’s ally)……..
The difference is Trump wants dialogue, ala NKorea,
and to simply make a cheap political point,
Dem’s (and RINO’s) are resisting him.
Dialogue doesn’t do any good if your actions are hostile and the North Korea situation is proving that. And any dialogue with Russia will have to involve a complete turnaround from our current hostility towards them before that dialogue can be meaningful. And as long as Trump surrounds himself with the likes of Bolton and Pompeo ANY dialogue will be useless.
Yeah, maybe Bernie can fix it, AAAHH!
And the Trump administration for increasing sanctions, expelling diplomats, increasing our arms sales to Ukraine, pushing for more NATO membership with Russia’ neighbors, and leaving the INF treaty.
That’s what happens when you close off any dialogue,
the worst instincts take over.
But Dem’s needed a political issue, because they had nothing else.
Playing with fire for politics, insane.
Both the Democrat Party and the Trump administration are to blame for the chilling relations between the US and Russia. The Dems invented a “Russian collusion” fiction that resulted in estranging the two countries for over 2 years.
The Trump administration – pushed by traitors Bonkers Bolton and Pompous Pompeo – increased sanctions, expelled diplomats, increased arms sales to Ukraine, pushed for more NATO membership with Russia’s neighbors, and left the INF treaty.
Trump should’ve fired both Pompous Pompeo and Bonkers Bolton back in the middle of last December for sabotaging his agenda of pulling ALL US troops from Syria, but he just didn’t have the courage to do it. Bonkers had the nerve to betray his country by going off on his own volition to Israel and tell his bosom buddy – PM Bibzy Nutty&Yahoo – that Trump was planning a full withdrawal from Syria. To me, that’s treason.
No more promotions for this guy.
The Russians understand us just fine General. Don’t pretend these poor relations are anyone’s fault except your CnC’s.